Abstract
Two central features of polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemosensory movement behavior demand fundamental theoretical understanding. In uniform concentrations of chemoattractant, these cells exhibit a persistent random walk, with a characteristic "persistence time" between significant changes in direction. In chemoattractant concentration gradients, they demonstrate a biased random walk, with an "orientation bias" characterizing the fraction of cells moving up the gradient. A coherent picture of cell movement responses to chemoattractant requires that both the persistence time and the orientation bias be explained within a unifying framework. In this paper, we offer the possibility that "noise" in the cellular signal perception/response mechanism can simultaneously account for these two key phenomena. In particular, we develop a stochastic mathematical model for cell locomotion based on kinetic fluctuations in chemoattractant/receptor binding. This model can simulate cell paths similar to those observed experimentally, under conditions of uniform chemoattractant concentrations as well as chemoattractant concentration gradients. Furthermore, this model can quantitatively predict both cell persistence time and dependence of orientation bias on gradient size. Thus, the concept of signal "noise" can quantitatively unify the major characteristics of leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis. The same level of noise large enough to account for the observed frequency of turning in uniform environments is simultaneously small enough to allow for the observed degree of directional bias in gradients.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (773.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allan R. B., Wilkinson P. C. A visual analysis of chemotactic and chemokinetic locomotion of human neutrophil leucocytes. Use of a new chemotaxis assay with Candida albicans as gradient source. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Jan;111(1):191–203. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90249-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeLisi C., Marchetti F., Del Grosso G. A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis. Cell Biophys. 1982 Jun-Sep;4(2-3):211–229. doi: 10.1007/BF02918313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunn G. A. Characterising a kinesis response: time averaged measures of cell speed and directional persistence. Agents Actions Suppl. 1983;12:14–33. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9352-7_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lackie J. M., Wilkinson P. C. Adhesion and locomotion of neutrophil leucocytes on 2-D substrata and in 3-D matrices. Kroc Found Ser. 1984;16:237–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramsey W. S. Analysis of individual leucocyte behavior during chemotaxis.. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Jan;70(1):129–139. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90190-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan S. J., Daukas G., Zigmond S. H. Asymmetric distribution of the chemotactic peptide receptor on polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;99(4 Pt 1):1461–1467. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.4.1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan S. J., Zigmond S. H. Chemotactic peptide receptor modulation in polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jun;85(3):703–711. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tranquillo R. T., Lauffenburger D. A. Consequences of chemosensory phenomena for leukocyte chemotactic orientation. Cell Biophys. 1986 Feb;8(1):1–46. doi: 10.1007/BF02788459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tranquillo R. T., Lauffenburger D. A. Stochastic model of leukocyte chemosensory movement. J Math Biol. 1987;25(3):229–262. doi: 10.1007/BF00276435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zigmond S. H. Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors. J Cell Biol. 1977 Nov;75(2 Pt 1):606–616. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.2.606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]