Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1988 Jul 1;107(1):141–152. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.1.141

Mutations that encode partially functional beta 2 tubulin subunits have different effects on structurally different microtubule arrays

PMCID: PMC2115173  PMID: 3134362

Abstract

The testis-specific beta 2 tubulin of Drosophila is required for assembly and function of at least three architecturally different microtubule arrays (Kemphues et al., 1982). Two recessive male-sterile mutations in the B2t locus that encode partially functional, stable, variant forms of beta 2 tubulin cause defects in only certain microtubule-based processes during spermatogenesis. These mutations could thus identify aspects of beta tubulin primary structure critical for function only in specific microtubule arrays. In males carrying the B2t6 mutation, meiotic chromosome segregation and nuclear shaping are normal and flagellar axonemes are formed, but there is a subtle defect in axoneme structure; the outer doublet microtubules fill in with a central core normally seen only in the central pair and accessory microtubules. In homozygous B2t7 males, chromosome movement is usually normal during meiosis but cytokinesis often fails, cytoplasmic microtubules are assembled and nuclear shaping appears to be normal, but the flagellar axoneme lacks structural integrity. In contrast, the B2t8 allele affects a general property of tubulin, the ability to form normal side-to-side association of protofilaments (Fuller et al., 1987), and causes defects in meiosis, axoneme assembly and nuclear shaping. Certain combinations of these beta 2 tubulin mutations show interallelic complementation; in B2t6/B2t8 males functional sperm are produced and both variant subunits are incorporated into mature sperm, in the absence of wild-type beta 2 tubulin. Comparison of the phenotypes of the three partially functional beta 2 tubulin alleles reveals some aspects of tubulin primary structure more important for function in specific subsets of microtubule arrays, and other aspects required for the construction of microtubules in general.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cleveland D. W., Sullivan K. F. Molecular biology and genetics of tubulin. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:331–365. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.54.070185.001555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fuller M. T., Caulton J. H., Hutchens J. A., Kaufman T. C., Raff E. C. Genetic analysis of microtubule structure: a beta-tubulin mutation causes the formation of aberrant microtubules in vivo and in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;104(3):385–394. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. González C., Casal J., Ripoll P. Functional monopolar spindles caused by mutation in mgr, a cell division gene of Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Sci. 1988 Jan;89(Pt 1):39–47. doi: 10.1242/jcs.89.1.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hardy R. W. The influence of chromosome content on the size and shape of sperm heads in Drosophila melanogaster and the demonstration of chromosome loss during spermiogenesis. Genetics. 1975 Feb;79(2):231–264. doi: 10.1093/genetics/79.2.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kemphues K. J., Kaufman T. C., Raff R. A., Raff E. C. The testis-specific beta-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell. 1982 Dec;31(3 Pt 2):655–670. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90321-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kemphues K. J., Raff E. C., Kaufman T. C. Genetic analysis of B2t, the structural gene for a testis-specific beta-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):345–356. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kemphues K. J., Raff E. C., Raff R. A., Kaufman T. C. Mutation in a testis-specific beta-tubulin in Drosophila: analysis of its effects on meiosis and map location of the gene. Cell. 1980 Sep;21(2):445–451. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90481-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kemphues K. J., Raff R. A., Kaufman T. C., Raff E. C. Mutation in a structural gene for a beta-tubulin specific to testis in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Aug;76(8):3991–3995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.8.3991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kiefer B. I. Development, organization, and degeneration of the Drosophila sperm flagellum. J Cell Sci. 1970 Jan;6(1):177–194. doi: 10.1242/jcs.6.1.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kirchner K., Mandelkow E. M. Tubulin domains responsible for assembly of dimers and protofilaments. EMBO J. 1985 Sep;4(9):2397–2402. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03945.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lifschytz E., Hareven D. Gene expression and the control of spermatid morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1977 Jul 15;58(2):276–294. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90092-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mandelkow E. M., Herrmann M., Rühl U. Tubulin domains probed by limited proteolysis and subunit-specific antibodies. J Mol Biol. 1985 Sep 20;185(2):311–327. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90406-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rudolph J. E., Kimble M., Hoyle H. D., Subler M. A., Raff E. C. Three Drosophila beta-tubulin sequences: a developmentally regulated isoform (beta 3), the testis-specific isoform (beta 2), and an assembly-defective mutation of the testis-specific isoform (B2t8) reveal both an ancient divergence in metazoan isotypes and structural constraints for beta-tubulin function. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Jun;7(6):2231–2242. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.6.2231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tokuyasu K. T. Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Nuclear transformation. J Ultrastruct Res. 1974 Aug;48(2):284–303. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(74)80083-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tokuyasu K. T. Dynamics of spermiogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. VI. Significance of "onion" nebenkern formation. J Ultrastruct Res. 1975 Oct;53(1):93–112. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(75)80089-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zabin I., Villarejo M. R. Protein complementation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1975;44:295–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.44.070175.001455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES