Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1988 Oct 1;107(4):1397–1408. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1397

Acetylcholine receptors and concanavalin A-binding sites on cultured Xenopus muscle cells: electrophoresis, diffusion, and aggregation [corrected and republished article originally printed in J Cell Biol 1988 May;106(5):1723-34]

PMCID: PMC2115237  PMID: 3170634

Abstract

Using digitally analyzed fluorescence videomicroscopy, we have examined the behavior of acetylcholine receptors and concanavalin A binding sites in response to externally applied electric fields. The distributions of these molecules on cultured Xenopus myoballs were used to test a simple model which assumes that electrophoresis and diffusion are the only important processes involved. The model describes the distribution of concanavalin A sites quite well over a fourfold range of electric field strengths; the results suggest an average diffusion constant of approximately 2.3 X 10(-9) cm2/s. At higher electric field strengths, the asymmetry seen is substantially less than that predicted by the model. Acetylcholine receptors subjected to electric fields show distributions substantially different from those predicted on the basis of simple electrophoresis and diffusion, and evidence a marked tendency to aggregate. Our results suggest that this aggregation is due to lateral migration of surface acetylcholine receptors, and is dependent on surface interactions, rather than the rearrangement of microfilaments or microtubules. The data are consistent with a diffusion-trap mechanism of receptor aggregation, and suggest that the event triggering receptor localization is a local increase in the concentration of acetylcholine receptors, or the electrophoretic concentration of some other molecular species. These observations suggest that, whatever mechanism(s) trigger initial clustering events in vivo, the accumulation of acetylcholine receptors can be substantially enhanced by passive, diffusion-mediated aggregation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson M. J., Cohen M. W., Zorychta E. Effects of innervation on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;268(3):731–756. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloch R. J. Dispersal and reformation of acetylcholine receptor clusters of cultured rat myotubes treated with inhibitors of energy metabolism. J Cell Biol. 1979 Sep;82(3):626–643. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.3.626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloch R. J., Geiger B. The localization of acetylcholine receptor clusters in areas of cell-substrate contact in cultures of rat myotubes. Cell. 1980 Aug;21(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90111-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boulter J., Patrick J. Concanavalin A inhibition of alpha-bungarotoxin binding to a nonfusing muscle cell line. J Biol Chem. 1979 Jul 10;254(13):5652–5657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brackenbury R., Rutishauser U., Edelman G. M. Distinct calcium-independent and calcium-dependent adhesion systems of chicken embryo cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):387–391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chao N. M., Young S. H., Poo M. M. Localization of cell membrane components by surface diffusion into a "trap". Biophys J. 1981 Oct;36(1):139–153. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84721-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Connolly J. A. Role of the cytoskeleton in the formation, stabilization, and removal of acetylcholine receptor clusters in cultured muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 1):148–154. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davey D. F., Cohen M. W. Localization of acetylcholine receptors and cholinesterase on nerve-contacted and noncontacted muscle cells grown in the presence of agents that block action potentials. J Neurosci. 1986 Mar;6(3):673–680. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-03-00673.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Edidin M. Rotational and translational diffusion in membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1974;3(0):179–201. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.03.060174.001143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Edwards C., Frisch H. L. A model for the localization of acetylcholine receptors at the muscle endplate. J Neurobiol. 1976 Jul;7(4):377–381. doi: 10.1002/neu.480070409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fraser S. E., Poo M. Development, maintenance, and modulation of patterned membrane topography: models based on the acetylcholine receptor. Curr Top Dev Biol. 1982;17(Pt 3):77–100. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60519-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Frye L. D., Edidin M. The rapid intermixing of cell surface antigens after formation of mouse-human heterokaryons. J Cell Sci. 1970 Sep;7(2):319–335. doi: 10.1242/jcs.7.2.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grunwald G. B., Geller R. L., Lilien J. Enzymatic dissection of embryonic cell adhesive mechanisms. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jun;85(3):766–776. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Henderson L. P., Smith M. A., Spitzer N. C. The absence of calcium blocks impulse-evoked release of acetylcholine but not de novo formation of functional neuromuscular synaptic contacts in culture. J Neurosci. 1984 Dec;4(12):3140–3150. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-12-03140.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jaffe L. F. Electrophoresis along cell membranes. Nature. 1977 Feb 17;265(5595):600–602. doi: 10.1038/265600a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuromi H., Brass B., Kidokoro Y. Formation of acetylcholine receptor clusters at neuromuscular junction in Xenopus cultures. Dev Biol. 1985 May;109(1):165–176. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(85)90357-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuromi H., Kidokoro Y. Nerve disperses preexisting acetylcholine receptor clusters prior to induction of receptor accumulation in Xenopus muscle cultures. Dev Biol. 1984 May;103(1):53–61. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lin-Liu S., Adey W. R., Poo M. M. Migration of cell surface concanavalin A receptors in pulsed electric fields. Biophys J. 1984 Jun;45(6):1211–1217. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(84)84270-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Marchesi V. T. Stabilizing infrastructure of cell membranes. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:531–561. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.002531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McDaniel R., McLaughlin S. The interaction of calcium with gangliosides in bilayer membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985 Oct 10;819(2):153–160. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(85)90169-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McLaughlin S., Poo M. M. The role of electro-osmosis in the electric-field-induced movement of charged macromolecules on the surfaces of cells. Biophys J. 1981 Apr;34(1):85–93. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(81)84838-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. O'Rourke N. A., Fraser S. E. Dynamic aspects of retinotectal map formation revealed by a vital-dye fiber-tracing technique. Dev Biol. 1986 Apr;114(2):265–276. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90191-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Orida N., Poo M. M. Electrophoretic movement and localisation of acetylcholine receptors in the embryonic muscle cell membrane. Nature. 1978 Sep 7;275(5675):31–35. doi: 10.1038/275031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Orida N., Poo M. M. Maintenance and dissolution of acetylcholine receptor clusters in the embryonic muscle cell membrane. Brain Res. 1981 Apr;227(2):293–298. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(81)90116-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Orida N., Poo M. M. On the developmental regulation of acetylcholine receptor mobility in the Xenopus embryonic muscle membrane. Exp Cell Res. 1980 Dec;130(2):281–290. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(80)90004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peng H. B., Jaffe L. F. Polarization of fucoid eggs by steady electrical fields. Dev Biol. 1976 Oct 15;53(2):277–284. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90229-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peng H. B. Participation of calcium and calmodulin in the formation of acetylcholine receptor clusters. J Cell Biol. 1984 Feb;98(2):550–557. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.2.550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Poo M. M., Poo W. J., Lam J. W. Lateral electrophoresis and diffusion of Concanavalin A receptors in the membrane of embryonic muscle cell. J Cell Biol. 1978 Feb;76(2):483–501. doi: 10.1083/jcb.76.2.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Poo M., Cone R. A. Lateral diffusion of rhodopsin in the photoreceptor membrane. Nature. 1974 Feb 15;247(5441):438–441. doi: 10.1038/247438a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Poo M. In situ electrophoresis of membrane components. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1981;10:245–276. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.10.060181.001333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Poo M. Rapid lateral diffusion of functional A Ch receptors in embryonic muscle cell membrane. Nature. 1982 Jan 28;295(5847):332–334. doi: 10.1038/295332a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Poo M., Robinson K. R. Electrophoresis of concanavalin A receptors along embryonic muscle cell membrane. Nature. 1977 Feb 17;265(5595):602–605. doi: 10.1038/265602a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Prives J., Fulton A. B., Penman S., Daniels M. P., Christian C. N. Interaction of the cytoskeletal framework with acetylcholine receptor on th surface of embryonic muscle cells in culture. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jan;92(1):231–236. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.1.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ravdin P., Axelrod D. Fluorescent tetramethyl rhodamine derivatives of alpha-bungarotoxin: preparation, separation, and characterization. Anal Biochem. 1977 Jun;80(2):585–592. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(77)90682-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Role L. W., Matossian V. R., O'Brien R. J., Fischbach G. D. On the mechanism of acetylcholine receptor accumulation at newly formed synapses on chick myotubes. J Neurosci. 1985 Aug;5(8):2197–2204. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-08-02197.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schuetze S. M., Role L. W. Developmental regulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1987;10:403–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.10.030187.002155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Singer S. J., Nicolson G. L. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. 1972 Feb 18;175(4023):720–731. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4023.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Takeichi M. Functional correlation between cell adhesive properties and some cell surface proteins. J Cell Biol. 1977 Nov;75(2 Pt 1):464–474. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.2.464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Weaver D. L. Diffusion-mediated localization on membrane surfaces. Biophys J. 1983 Jan;41(1):81–86. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84407-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ziskind-Conhaim L., Geffen I., Hall Z. W. Redistribution of acetylcholine receptors on developing rat myotubes. J Neurosci. 1984 Sep;4(9):2346–2349. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-09-02346.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES