Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1988 Oct 1;107(4):1437–1448. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437

Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies

PMCID: PMC2115242  PMID: 3170635

Abstract

We have developed video microscopy methods to visualize the assembly and disassembly of individual microtubules at 33-ms intervals. Porcine brain tubulin, free of microtubule-associated proteins, was assembled onto axoneme fragments at 37 degrees C, and the dynamic behavior of the plus and minus ends of microtubules was analyzed for tubulin concentrations between 7 and 15.5 microM. Elongation and rapid shortening were distinctly different phases. At each end, the elongation phase was characterized by a second order association and a substantial first order dissociation reaction. Association rate constants were 8.9 and 4.3 microM-1 s-1 for the plus and minus ends, respectively; and the corresponding dissociation rate constants were 44 and 23 s-1. For both ends, the rate of tubulin dissociation equaled the rate of tubulin association at 5 microM. The rate of rapid shortening was similar at the two ends (plus = 733 s-1; minus = 915 s-1), and did not vary with tubulin concentration. Transitions between phases were abrupt and stochastic. As the tubulin concentration was increased, catastrophe frequency decreased at both ends, and rescue frequency increased dramatically at the minus end. This resulted in fewer rapid shortening phases at higher tubulin concentrations for both ends and shorter rapid shortening phases at the minus end. At each concentration, the frequency of catastrophe was slightly greater at the plus end, and the frequency of rescue was greater at the minus end. Our data demonstrate that microtubules assembled from pure tubulin undergo dynamic instability over a twofold range of tubulin concentrations, and that the dynamic instability of the plus and minus ends of microtubules can be significantly different. Our analysis indicates that this difference could produce treadmilling, and establishes general limits on the effectiveness of length redistribution as a measure of dynamic instability. Our results are consistent with the existence of a GTP cap during elongation, but are not consistent with existing GTP cap models.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen R. D., Allen N. S., Travis J. L. Video-enhanced contrast, differential interference contrast (AVEC-DIC) microscopy: a new method capable of analyzing microtubule-related motility in the reticulopodial network of Allogromia laticollaris. Cell Motil. 1981;1(3):291–302. doi: 10.1002/cm.970010303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell C. W., Fraser C., Sale W. S., Tang W. J., Gibbons I. R. Preparation and purification of dynein. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;24:373–397. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60666-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergen L. G., Borisy G. G. Head-to-tail polymerization of microtubules in vitro. Electron microscope analysis of seeded assembly. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jan;84(1):141–150. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borisy G. G., Bergen L. G. A direct method for analyzing the polymerization kinetics at the two ends of a microtubule. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;24:171–187. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60654-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caplow M. Location of the guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis site in microtubules. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1986;466:510–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb38428.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caplow M., Reid R. Directed elongation model for microtubule GTP hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 May;82(10):3267–3271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.10.3267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlier M. F., Didry D., Pantaloni D. Microtubule elongation and guanosine 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis. Role of guanine nucleotides in microtubule dynamics. Biochemistry. 1987 Jul 14;26(14):4428–4437. doi: 10.1021/bi00388a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carlier M. F., Hill T. L., Chen Y. Interference of GTP hydrolysis in the mechanism of microtubule assembly: an experimental study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Feb;81(3):771–775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.3.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlier M. F., Pantaloni D. Kinetic analysis of guanosine 5'-triphosphate hydrolysis associated with tubulin polymerization. Biochemistry. 1981 Mar 31;20(7):1918–1924. doi: 10.1021/bi00510a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cassimeris L. U., Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Dynamics of microtubule depolymerization in monocytes. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jun;102(6):2023–2032. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.6.2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cassimeris L. U., Walker R. A., Pryer N. K., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of microtubules. Bioessays. 1987 Oct;7(4):149–154. doi: 10.1002/bies.950070403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen Y. D., Hill T. L. Monte Carlo study of the GTP cap in a five-start helix model of a microtubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Feb;82(4):1131–1135. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.4.1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. David-Pfeuty T., Erickson H. P., Pantaloni D. Guanosinetriphosphatase activity of tubulin associated with microtubule assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5372–5376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Farrell K. W., Jordan M. A., Miller H. P., Wilson L. Phase dynamics at microtubule ends: the coexistence of microtubule length changes and treadmilling. J Cell Biol. 1987 Apr;104(4):1035–1046. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.4.1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gard D. L., Kirschner M. W. A microtubule-associated protein from Xenopus eggs that specifically promotes assembly at the plus-end. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2203–2215. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hill T. L., Chen Y. Phase changes at the end of a microtubule with a GTP cap. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(18):5772–5776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.18.5772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Horio T., Hotani H. Visualization of the dynamic instability of individual microtubules by dark-field microscopy. Nature. 1986 Jun 5;321(6070):605–607. doi: 10.1038/321605a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson K. A., Borisy G. G. Kinetic analysis of microtubule self-assembly in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov 25;117(1):1–31. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karr T. L., Podrasky A. E., Purich D. L. Participation of guanine nucleotides in nucleation and elongation steps of microtubule assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Nov;76(11):5475–5479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.11.5475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kirschner M. W., Mitchison T. Microtubule dynamics. Nature. 1986 Dec 18;324(6098):621–621. doi: 10.1038/324621a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kobayashi T. Dephosphorylation of tubulin-bound guanosine triphosphate during microtubule assembly. J Biochem. 1975 Jun;77(6):1193–1197. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kristofferson D., Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Direct observation of steady-state microtubule dynamics. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1007–1019. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Leslie R. J., Saxton W. M., Mitchison T. J., Neighbors B., Salmon E. D., McIntosh J. R. Assembly properties of fluorescein-labeled tubulin in vitro before and after fluorescence bleaching. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2146–2156. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lutz D. A., Inoué S. Techniques for observing living gametes and embryos. Methods Cell Biol. 1986;27:89–110. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60344-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Merril C. R., Goldman D., Sedman S. A., Ebert M. H. Ultrasensitive stain for proteins in polyacrylamide gels shows regional variation in cerebrospinal fluid proteins. Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1437–1438. doi: 10.1126/science.6162199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mitchison T., Evans L., Schulze E., Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Microtubule assembly nucleated by isolated centrosomes. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):232–237. doi: 10.1038/312232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Morrissey J. H. Silver stain for proteins in polyacrylamide gels: a modified procedure with enhanced uniform sensitivity. Anal Biochem. 1981 Nov 1;117(2):307–310. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90783-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. O'Brien E. T., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P. GTP hydrolysis during microtubule assembly. Biochemistry. 1987 Jun 30;26(13):4148–4156. doi: 10.1021/bi00387a061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Penningroth S. M., Kirschner M. W. Nucleotide binding and phosphorylation in microtubule assembly in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1977 Oct 5;115(4):643–673. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90108-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pryer N. K., Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Polarized microtubule gliding and particle saltations produced by soluble factors from sea urchin eggs and embryos. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1986;6(6):537–548. doi: 10.1002/cm.970060602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sammak P. J., Gorbsky G. J., Borisy G. G. Microtubule dynamics in vivo: a test of mechanisms of turnover. J Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;104(3):395–405. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schnapp B. J. Viewing single microtubules by video light microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:561–573. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)34121-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schulze E., Kirschner M. Microtubule dynamics in interphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1020–1031. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Voter W. A., Erickson H. P. Electron microscopy of MAP 2 (microtubule-associated protein 2). J Ultrastruct Res. 1982 Sep;80(3):374–382. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(82)80051-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Voter W. A., Erickson H. P. The kinetics of microtubule assembly. Evidence for a two-stage nucleation mechanism. J Biol Chem. 1984 Aug 25;259(16):10430–10438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Analysis of the treadmilling model during metaphase of mitosis using fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1032–1038. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Preparation and characterization of fluorescent analogs of tubulin. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:519–528. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)34117-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wegner A. Head to tail polymerization of actin. J Mol Biol. 1976 Nov;108(1):139–150. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(76)80100-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Weisenberg R. C., Deery W. J., Dickinson P. J. Tubulin-nucleotide interactions during the polymerization and depolymerization of microtubules. Biochemistry. 1976 Sep 21;15(19):4248–4254. doi: 10.1021/bi00664a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yanagisawa T., Hasegawa S., Mohri H. The bound nucleotides of the isolated microtubules of sea-urchin sperm flagella and their possible role in flagellar movement. Exp Cell Res. 1968 Sep;52(1):86–100. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90549-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zeeberg B., Caplow M. An isoenergetic exchange mechanism which accounts for tubulin-GDP stabilization of microtubules. J Biol Chem. 1981 Dec 10;256(23):12051–12057. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES