Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1989 Mar 1;108(3):789–795. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.3.789

Nascent secretory chain binding and translocation are distinct processes: differentiation by chemical alkylation

PMCID: PMC2115388  PMID: 2537834

Abstract

We have investigated the effects of chemical alkylation of microsomal membranes on nascent chain binding and translocation. Assays were conducted using either full-length or truncated preprolactin transcripts in combination with a reconstituted membrane system consisting of proteolyzed rough microsomes and the cytoplasmic domain of the signal recognition particle receptor. Treatment of rough microsomes with N-ethylmaleimide was observed to inhibit preprolactin processing at a site other than the signal recognition particle or the signal recognition particle receptor. As formation of a translocation competent junction between the ribosome/nascent chain complex and the membrane has recently been demonstrated to require GTP (Connolly, T., and R. Gilmore. J. Cell Biol. 1986. 103:2253-2261), the effects of membrane alkylation on this parameter were assessed. N-ethylmaleimide treatment did not inhibit nascent chain targeting or GTP-dependent signal sequence insertion. Translocation of the targeted and inserted nascent chain was, however, blocked. These data indicate (a) that the process of nascent chain translocation is distinct from targeting and signal sequence insertion, and (b) translocation of the peptide chain across the membrane is mediated by an N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive membrane protein component(s). To further substantiate the observation that nascent chain targeting and signal sequence insertion can be distinguished from translocation, the temperature dependencies of the two phenomena were compared. Signal sequence insertion occurred at low temperatures (4 degrees C) and was maximal between 10 and 15 degrees C. Translocation was only observed at higher temperatures and was maximal between 25 and 30 degrees C.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergman L. W., Kuehl W. M. Formation of an intrachain disulfide bond on nascent immunoglobulin light chains. J Biol Chem. 1979 Sep 25;254(18):8869–8876. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernabeu C., Lake J. A. Nascent polypeptide chains emerge from the exit domain of the large ribosomal subunit: immune mapping of the nascent chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 May;79(10):3111–3115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.10.3111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blobel G., Dobberstein B. Transfer of proteins across membranes. I. Presence of proteolytically processed and unprocessed nascent immunoglobulin light chains on membrane-bound ribosomes of murine myeloma. J Cell Biol. 1975 Dec;67(3):835–851. doi: 10.1083/jcb.67.3.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blobel G. Intracellular protein topogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Mar;77(3):1496–1500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.3.1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blobel G., Sabatini D. D. Controlled proteolysis of nascent polypeptides in rat liver cell fractions. I. Location of the polypeptides within ribosomes. J Cell Biol. 1970 Apr;45(1):130–145. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.1.130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Connolly T., Gilmore R. Formation of a functional ribosome-membrane junction during translocation requires the participation of a GTP-binding protein. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 1):2253–2261. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Engelman D. M., Steitz T. A. The spontaneous insertion of proteins into and across membranes: the helical hairpin hypothesis. Cell. 1981 Feb;23(2):411–422. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90136-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilmore R., Blobel G. Translocation of secretory proteins across the microsomal membrane occurs through an environment accessible to aqueous perturbants. Cell. 1985 Sep;42(2):497–505. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90107-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gilmore R., Walter P., Blobel G. Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. II. Isolation and characterization of the signal recognition particle receptor. J Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;95(2 Pt 1):470–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.2.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoffman K. E., Gilmore R. Guanosine triphosphate promotes the post-translational integration of opsin into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J Biol Chem. 1988 Mar 25;263(9):4381–4385. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hortsch M., Avossa D., Meyer D. I. Characterization of secretory protein translocation: ribosome-membrane interaction in endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;103(1):241–253. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.1.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jackson R. C., Walter P., Blobel G. Secretion requires a cytoplasmically disposed sulphydryl of the RER membrane. Nature. 1980 Jul 10;286(5769):174–176. doi: 10.1038/286174a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Katz F. N., Rothman J. E., Lingappa V. R., Blobel G., Lodish H. F. Membrane assembly in vitro: synthesis, glycosylation, and asymmetric insertion of a transmembrane protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Aug;74(8):3278–3282. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Malkin L. I., Rich A. Partial resistance of nascent polypeptide chains to proteolytic digestion due to ribosomal shielding. J Mol Biol. 1967 Jun 14;26(2):329–346. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90301-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meyer D. I., Krause E., Dobberstein B. Secretory protein translocation across membranes-the role of the "docking protein'. Nature. 1982 Jun 24;297(5868):647–650. doi: 10.1038/297647a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Perara E., Lingappa V. R. A former amino terminal signal sequence engineered to an internal location directs translocation of both flanking protein domains. J Cell Biol. 1985 Dec;101(6):2292–2301. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.6.2292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sasavage N. L., Nilson J. H., Horowitz S., Rottman F. M. Nucleotide sequence of bovine prolactin messenger RNA. Evidence for sequence polymorphism. J Biol Chem. 1982 Jan 25;257(2):678–681. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Singer S. J., Maher P. A., Yaffe M. P. On the translocation of proteins across membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Feb;84(4):1015–1019. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.4.1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tajima S., Lauffer L., Rath V. L., Walter P. The signal recognition particle receptor is a complex that contains two distinct polypeptide chains. J Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;103(4):1167–1178. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.4.1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Walter P., Blobel G. Preparation of microsomal membranes for cotranslational protein translocation. Methods Enzymol. 1983;96:84–93. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(83)96010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Walter P., Blobel G. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum III. Signal recognition protein (SRP) causes signal sequence-dependent and site-specific arrest of chain elongation that is released by microsomal membranes. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):557–561. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Walter P., Blobel G. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum. II. Signal recognition protein (SRP) mediates the selective binding to microsomal membranes of in-vitro-assembled polysomes synthesizing secretory protein. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):551–556. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Walter P., Ibrahimi I., Blobel G. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum. I. Signal recognition protein (SRP) binds to in-vitro-assembled polysomes synthesizing secretory protein. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):545–550. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wickner W. The assembly of proteins into biological membranes: The membrane trigger hypothesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1979;48:23–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.48.070179.000323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wiedmann M., Kurzchalia T. V., Hartmann E., Rapoport T. A. A signal sequence receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. 1987 Aug 27-Sep 2Nature. 328(6133):830–833. doi: 10.1038/328830a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wilson C., Connolly T., Morrison T., Gilmore R. Integration of membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum requires GTP. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jul;107(1):69–77. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. von Heijne G., Blomberg C. Trans-membrane translocation of proteins. The direct transfer model. Eur J Biochem. 1979 Jun;97(1):175–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1979.tb13100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. von Heijne G. How signal sequences maintain cleavage specificity. J Mol Biol. 1984 Feb 25;173(2):243–251. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90192-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES