Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1989 Feb 1;108(2):647–651. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.2.647

Degradation rate of acetylcholine receptors inserted into denervated vertebrate neuromuscular junctions

PMCID: PMC2115418  PMID: 2918028

Abstract

Many studies exist on the effect of denervation on the degradation of acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) at the vertebrate neuromuscular junction (nmj). These studies have described the behavior of either the total population of junctional receptors at different times after denervation, or of the receptors present at the time of denervation (referred to as original receptors). No experimental studies yet exist on the degradation rate of the receptors newly inserted into denervated junctions. In the previous studies, the original receptors of mouse sternomastoid muscles were found to retain the slow degradation (t 1/2) of approximately 8-10 d of innervated junctional receptors for up to 10 d after denervation before accelerating to a t 1/2 of approximately 3 d. The total junctional receptors, on the other hand, showed a progressive increase in degradation rate from a t 1/2 of 8-10 d to a t 1/2 of 1 d. To reconcile these earlier observations, the present study examines the degradation of new receptors inserted into the nmj after denervation. To avoid possible contamination of the data with postdenervation extrajunctional receptors, we used transmission electron microscope autoradiography to study only receptors located at the postjunctional fold of the nmj. We established that the new receptors inserted into denervated junctions have a t 1/2 of approximately 1 d, considerably faster than that of the original receptors and equivalent to that of postdenervation extrajunctional receptors. Both original and new receptors are interspersed at the top of the junctional folds. Thus, until all the original receptors are degraded, the postjunctional membrane contains two populations of AChRs that maintain a total steady-state site density but degrade at different rates. The progressive increase in turnover rate of total AChRs therefore reflects the combined rates of the original and new receptors, as earlier postulated by Levitt and Salpeter (1981).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (908.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almon R. R., Andrew C. G., Appel S. H. Acetylcholine receptor in normal and denervated slow and fast muscle. Biochemistry. 1974 Dec 31;13(27):5522–5528. doi: 10.1021/bi00724a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bader D. Density and distribution of alpha-bungarotoxin-binding sites in postsynaptic structures of regenerated rat skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1981 Feb;88(2):338–345. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.2.338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bevan S., Steinbach J. H. Denervation increases the degradation rate of acetylcholine receptors at end-plates in vivo and in vitro. J Physiol. 1983 Mar;336:159–177. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brett R. S., Younkin S. G., Konieczkowski M., Slugg R. M. Accelerated degradation of junctional acetylcholine receptor-alpha-bungarotoxin complexes in denervated rat diaphragm. Brain Res. 1982 Feb 4;233(1):133–142. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90935-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burden S. Acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction: developmental change in receptor turnover. Dev Biol. 1977 Nov;61(1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90343-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fambrough D. M. Control of acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle. Physiol Rev. 1979 Jan;59(1):165–227. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1979.59.1.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Localization of acetylcholine receptor by 125I-labeled alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse motor endplates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Apr;71(4):1376–1378. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):144–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fertuck H. C., Woodward W., Salpeter M. M. In vivo recovery of muscle contraction after alpha-bungarotoxin binding. J Cell Biol. 1975 Jul;66(1):209–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.66.1.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Frank E., Gautvik K., Sommerschild H. Persistence of junctional acetylcholine receptors following denervation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:275–281. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. KARNOVSKY M. J., ROOTS L. A "DIRECT-COLORING" THIOCHOLINE METHOD FOR CHOLINESTERASES. J Histochem Cytochem. 1964 Mar;12:219–221. doi: 10.1177/12.3.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levitt-Gilmour T. A., Salpeter M. M. Gradient of extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors early after denervation of mammalian muscle. J Neurosci. 1986 Jun;6(6):1606–1612. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-06-01606.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levitt T. A., Loring R. H., Salpeter M. M. Neuronal control of acetylcholine receptor turnover rate at a vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Science. 1980 Oct 31;210(4469):550–551. doi: 10.1126/science.7423205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Levitt T. A., Salpeter M. M. Denervated endplates have a dual population of junctional acetylcholine receptors. Nature. 1981 May 21;291(5812):239–241. doi: 10.1038/291239a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Loring R. H., Salpeter M. M. Denervation increases turnover rate of junctional acetylcholine receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Apr;77(4):2293–2297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.4.2293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Matthews-Bellinger J., Salpeter M. M. Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:197–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Porter C. W., Barnard E. A. Distribution and density of cholinergic receptors at the motor endplates of a denervated mouse muscle. Exp Neurol. 1975 Sep;48(3 Pt 1):542–556. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(75)90012-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. SALPETER M. M., BACHMANN L. AUTORADIOGRAPHY WITH THE ELECTRON MICROSCOPE. A PROCEDURE FOR IMPROVING RESOLUTION, SENSITIVITY, AND CONTRAST. J Cell Biol. 1964 Aug;22:469–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.2.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Salpeter M. M., Bachmann L., Salpeter E. E. Resolution in electron microscope radioautography. J Cell Biol. 1969 Apr;41(1):1–32. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Salpeter M. M., Cooper D. L., Levitt-Gilmour T. Degradation rates of acetylcholine receptors can be modified in the postjunctional plasma membrane of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. J Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;103(4):1399–1403. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.4.1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Salpeter M. M., Harris R. Distribution and turnover rate of acetylcholine receptors throughout the junction folds at a vertebrate neuromuscular junction. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jun;96(6):1781–1785. doi: 10.1083/jcb.96.6.1781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Salpeter M. M., Loring R. H. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in vertebrate muscle: properties, distribution and neural control. Prog Neurobiol. 1985;25(4):297–325. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(85)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Salpeter M. M., Marchaterre M., Harris R. Distribution of extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors on a vertebrate muscle: evaluated by using a scanning electron microscope autoradiographic procedure. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;106(6):2087–2093. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.6.2087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sealock R., Wray B. E., Froehner S. C. Ultrastructural localization of the Mr 43,000 protein and the acetylcholine receptor in Torpedo postsynaptic membranes using monoclonal antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;98(6):2239–2244. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.6.2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Stanley E. F., Drachman D. B. Denervation accelerates the degradation of junctional acetylcholine receptors. Exp Neurol. 1981 Aug;73(2):390–396. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(81)90274-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Steinbach J. H., Merlie J., Heinemann S., Bloch R. Degradation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by developing rat skeletal muscle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Jul;76(7):3547–3551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.7.3547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES