Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1988 Dec 1;107(6):2223–2231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2223

Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells

PMCID: PMC2115680  PMID: 3198684

Abstract

Individual microtubule dynamics were observed in real time in primary cultures of newt lung epithelium using video-enhanced differential interference contrast microscopy and digital image processing. The linear filaments observed in cells corresponded to microtubules based on three criteria: (a) small particles translocated along them; (b) the majority of them disappeared after incubation in nocodazole; (c) and the distribution observed by differential interference contrast correlated with anti-tubulin immunofluorescence staining of the same cell. Microtubules were most clearly observed at the leading edge of cells located at the periphery of the epithelial sheet. Microtubules exhibited dynamic instability behavior: individual microtubules existed in persistent phases of elongation or rapid shortening. Microtubules elongated at a velocity of 7.2 micron/min +/- 0.3 SEM (n = 42) and rapidly shortened at a velocity of 17.3 micron/min +/- 0.7 SEM (n = 35). The transitions between elongation and rapid shortening occurred abruptly and stochastically with a transition frequency of 0.014 s-1 for catastrophe and 0.044 s-1 for rescue. Approximately 70% of the rapidly shortening microtubules were rescued and resumed elongation within the 35 x 35 micron microscopic field. A portion of the microtubule population appeared differentially stable and did not display any measurable elongation or shortening during 10-15-min observations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen R. D., Allen N. S., Travis J. L. Video-enhanced contrast, differential interference contrast (AVEC-DIC) microscopy: a new method capable of analyzing microtubule-related motility in the reticulopodial network of Allogromia laticollaris. Cell Motil. 1981;1(3):291–302. doi: 10.1002/cm.970010303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cassimeris L. U., Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Dynamics of microtubule depolymerization in monocytes. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jun;102(6):2023–2032. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.6.2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassimeris L. U., Walker R. A., Pryer N. K., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of microtubules. Bioessays. 1987 Oct;7(4):149–154. doi: 10.1002/bies.950070403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daniels M. The role of microtubules in the growth and stabilization of nerve fibers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jun 30;253:535–544. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1975.tb19227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hayden J. H., Allen R. D. Detection of single microtubules in living cells: particle transport can occur in both directions along the same microtubule. J Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;99(5):1785–1793. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.5.1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hiller G., Weber K. Radioimmunoassay for tubulin: a quantitative comparison of the tubulin content of different established tissue culture cells and tissues. Cell. 1978 Aug;14(4):795–804. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90335-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horio T., Hotani H. Visualization of the dynamic instability of individual microtubules by dark-field microscopy. Nature. 1986 Jun 5;321(6070):605–607. doi: 10.1038/321605a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Inoué S. Video image processing greatly enhances contrast, quality, and speed in polarization-based microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):346–356. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kirschner M., Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell. 1986 May 9;45(3):329–342. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90318-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koonce M. P., Tong J., Euteneuer U., Schliwa M. Active sliding between cytoplasmic microtubules. Nature. 1987 Aug 20;328(6132):737–739. doi: 10.1038/328737a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mitchison T., Evans L., Schulze E., Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Microtubule assembly nucleated by isolated centrosomes. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):232–237. doi: 10.1038/312232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Osborn M., Weber K. Immunofluorescence and immunocytochemical procedures with affinity purified antibodies: tubulin-containing structures. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;24:97–132. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60650-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pryer N. K., Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Polarized microtubule gliding and particle saltations produced by soluble factors from sea urchin eggs and embryos. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1986;6(6):537–548. doi: 10.1002/cm.970060602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rieder C. L., Davison E. A., Jensen L. C., Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle. J Cell Biol. 1986 Aug;103(2):581–591. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.2.581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Salmon E. D., Leslie R. J., Saxton W. M., Karow M. L., McIntosh J. R. Spindle microtubule dynamics in sea urchin embryos: analysis using a fluorescein-labeled tubulin and measurements of fluorescence redistribution after laser photobleaching. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2165–2174. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Salmon E. D., McKeel M., Hays T. Rapid rate of tubulin dissociation from microtubules in the mitotic spindle in vivo measured by blocking polymerization with colchicine. J Cell Biol. 1984 Sep;99(3):1066–1075. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.3.1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Direct observation of microtubule dynamics in living cells. Nature. 1988 Apr 21;332(6166):724–726. doi: 10.1038/332724a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sammak P. J., Gorbsky G. J., Borisy G. G. Microtubule dynamics in vivo: a test of mechanisms of turnover. J Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;104(3):395–405. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Saxton W. M., Stemple D. L., Leslie R. J., Salmon E. D., Zavortink M., McIntosh J. R. Tubulin dynamics in cultured mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2175–2186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schulze E., Kirschner M. Dynamic and stable populations of microtubules in cells. J Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;104(2):277–288. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.2.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Schulze E., Kirschner M. Microtubule dynamics in interphase cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1020–1031. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schulze E., Kirschner M. New features of microtubule behaviour observed in vivo. Nature. 1988 Jul 28;334(6180):356–359. doi: 10.1038/334356a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Soltys B. J., Borisy G. G. Polymerization of tubulin in vivo: direct evidence for assembly onto microtubule ends and from centrosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1682–1689. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Travis J. L., Bowser S. S. Optical approaches to the study of foraminiferan motility. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;10(1-2):126–136. doi: 10.1002/cm.970100117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Travis J. L., Kenealy J. F., Allen R. D. Studies on the motility of the foraminifera. II. The dynamic microtubular cytoskeleton of the reticulopodial network of Allogromia laticollaris. J Cell Biol. 1983 Dec;97(6):1668–1676. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.6.1668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vigers G. P., Coue M., McIntosh J. R. Fluorescent microtubules break up under illumination. J Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;107(3):1011–1024. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.3.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wadsworth P., Salmon E. D. Analysis of the treadmilling model during metaphase of mitosis using fluorescence redistribution after photobleaching. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1032–1038. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Walker R. A., O'Brien E. T., Pryer N. K., Soboeiro M. F., Voter W. A., Erickson H. P., Salmon E. D. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1437–1448. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES