Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1988 Dec 1;107(6):2181–2189. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2181

Modulation of cellular morphology and locomotory activity by antibodies against myosin

PMCID: PMC2115695  PMID: 2461948

Abstract

Three monoclonal antibodies directed against chicken brush border myosin were used to study the possible function of myosin in microfilament organization and locomotion of chicken fibroblasts. These antibodies bind to distinct and separate epitopes on the heavy chain of chicken nonmuscle myosin and display differential effects of myosin filament formation and actin-myosin interaction (Citi, S., and J. Kendrick-Jones. 1988. J. Musc. Res. Cell Motil. 9: 306-319). When injected into chicken fibroblasts, all antibodies induced breakdown of stress fibers. Concomitantly, a large proportion of the cells developed extensive lamellae which altered their morphology drastically. These cells showed also increased locomotory activity. All effects were concentration dependent and reversible. The most drastic alterations were observed with cells injected with antibody quantities exceeding the quantity of cellular myosin (molar ratios of antibody to myosin greater than 3:1). The finding that antibodies with different effects on myosin filament formation in vitro all induce similar intracellular processes suggests that it is the antibody-induced decrease in functional myosin that triggers an increase in plasma membrane dynamics and locomotory activity, rather than differences in myosin filament length or conformation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burridge K. Are stress fibres contractile? Nature. 1981 Dec 24;294(5843):691–692. doi: 10.1038/294691a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Citi S., Kendrick-Jones J. Brush border myosin filament assembly and interaction with actin investigated with monoclonal antibodies. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1988 Aug;9(4):306–319. doi: 10.1007/BF01773874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Citi S., Kendrick-Jones J. Studies on the structure and conformation of brush border myosin using monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Biochem. 1987 Jun 1;165(2):315–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb11444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarke M., Spudich J. A. Nonmuscle contractile proteins: the role of actin and myosin in cell motility and shape determination. Annu Rev Biochem. 1977;46:797–822. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.46.070177.004053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collins J. H., Borysenko C. W. The 110,000-dalton actin- and calmodulin-binding protein from intestinal brush border is a myosin-like ATPase. J Biol Chem. 1984 Nov 25;259(22):14128–14135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coluccio L. M., Bretscher A. Calcium-regulated cooperative binding of the microvillar 110K-calmodulin complex to F-actin: formation of decorated filaments. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):325–333. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.1.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Conzelman K. A., Mooseker M. S. The 110-kD protein-calmodulin complex of the intestinal microvillus is an actin-activated MgATPase. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):313–324. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.1.313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Côté G. P., Albanesi J. P., Ueno T., Hammer J. A., 3rd, Korn E. D. Purification from Dictyostelium discoideum of a low-molecular-weight myosin that resembles myosin I from Acanthamoeba castellanii. J Biol Chem. 1985 Apr 25;260(8):4543–4546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. De Lozanne A., Spudich J. A. Disruption of the Dictyostelium myosin heavy chain gene by homologous recombination. Science. 1987 May 29;236(4805):1086–1091. doi: 10.1126/science.3576222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elliott A., Offer G. Shape and flexibility of the myosin molecule. J Mol Biol. 1978 Aug 25;123(4):505–519. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(78)90204-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujiwara K., Pollard T. D. Fluorescent antibody localization of myosin in the cytoplasm, cleavage furrow, and mitotic spindle of human cells. J Cell Biol. 1976 Dec;71(3):848–875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.71.3.848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Füchtbauer A., Jockusch B. M., Maruta H., Kilimann M. W., Isenberg G. Disruption of microfilament organization after injection of F-actin capping proteins into living tissue culture cells. 1983 Jul 28-Aug 3Nature. 304(5924):361–364. doi: 10.1038/304361a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Graessmann M., Graessman A. "Early" simian-virus-40-specific RNA contains information for tumor antigen formation and chromatin replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Feb;73(2):366–370. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.2.366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. HUXLEY H. E. ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDIES ON THE STRUCTURE OF NATURAL AND SYNTHETIC PROTEIN FILAMENTS FROM STRIATED MUSCLE. J Mol Biol. 1963 Sep;7:281–308. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(63)80008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoshimaru M., Nakanishi S. Identification of a new type of mammalian myosin heavy chain by molecular cloning. Overlap of its mRNA with preprotachykinin B mRNA. J Biol Chem. 1987 Oct 25;262(30):14625–14632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Isenberg G., Rathke P. C., Hülsmann N., Franke W. W., Wohlfarth-Bottermann K. E. Cytoplasmic actomyosin fibrils in tissue culture cells: direct proof of contractility by visualization of ATP-induced contraction in fibrils isolated by laser micro-beam dissection. Cell Tissue Res. 1976 Feb 27;166(4):427–443. doi: 10.1007/BF00225909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kiehart D. P., Mabuchi I., Inoué S. Evidence that myosin does not contribute to force production in chromosome movement. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jul;94(1):165–178. doi: 10.1083/jcb.94.1.165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Knecht D. A., Loomis W. F. Antisense RNA inactivation of myosin heavy chain gene expression in Dictyostelium discoideum. Science. 1987 May 29;236(4805):1081–1086. doi: 10.1126/science.3576221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kreis T. E., Birchmeier W. Stress fiber sarcomeres of fibroblasts are contractile. Cell. 1980 Nov;22(2 Pt 2):555–561. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90365-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Langanger G., Moeremans M., Daneels G., Sobieszek A., De Brabander M., De Mey J. The molecular organization of myosin in stress fibers of cultured cells. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jan;102(1):200–209. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.1.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lowey S., Slayter H. S., Weeds A. G., Baker H. Substructure of the myosin molecule. I. Subfragments of myosin by enzymic degradation. J Mol Biol. 1969 May 28;42(1):1–29. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(69)90483-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mabuchi I., Okuno M. The effect of myosin antibody on the division of starfish blastomeres. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jul;74(1):251–263. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.1.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maruta H., Gadasi H., Collins J. H., Korn E. D. Multiple forms of Acanthamoeba myosin I. J Biol Chem. 1979 May 10;254(9):3624–3630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Montell C., Rubin G. M. The Drosophila ninaC locus encodes two photoreceptor cell specific proteins with domains homologous to protein kinases and the myosin heavy chain head. Cell. 1988 Mar 11;52(5):757–772. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90413-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pollard T. D., Stafford W. F., Porter M. E. Characterization of a second myosin from Acanthamoeba castellanii. J Biol Chem. 1978 Jul 10;253(13):4798–4808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pollard T. D., Weihing R. R. Actin and myosin and cell movement. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1974 Jan;2(1):1–65. doi: 10.3109/10409237409105443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rinnerthaler G., Geiger B., Small J. V. Contact formation during fibroblast locomotion: involvement of membrane ruffles and microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1988 Mar;106(3):747–760. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.3.747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sanger J. M., Mittal B., Wegner A., Jockusch B. M., Sanger J. W. Differential response of stress fibers and myofibrils to gelsolin. Eur J Cell Biol. 1987 Jun;43(3):421–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sanger J. W., Sanger J. M., Jockusch B. M. Differential response of three types of actin filament bundles to depletion of cellular ATP levels. Eur J Cell Biol. 1983 Sep;31(2):197–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yumura S., Mori H., Fukui Y. Localization of actin and myosin for the study of ameboid movement in Dictyostelium using improved immunofluorescence. J Cell Biol. 1984 Sep;99(3):894–899. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.3.894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES