Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1989 Aug 1;109(2):755–774. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.2.755

Three-dimensional structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and location of the major associated 43-kD cytoskeletal protein, determined at 22 A by low dose electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction to 12.5 A [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1989 Oct;109(4 Pt 1):1185]

PMCID: PMC2115713  PMID: 2760111

Abstract

The three-dimensional structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) from Torpedo californica, crystallized both before and after removal of associated proteins, most notably the main 43-kD cytoskeletal protein that interacts both with AChR and actin, is determined to a resolution of 22 A. This is the first structural analysis where the 43-kD protein has been removed from the sample before crystallization. Thus, it provides the most reliable assessment of what constitutes the structure of the minimal five subunit AChR complex, and, by comparison with the native membrane, of the location of the 43-kD cytoskeletal protein. Image reconstruction of two- dimensional crystals includes information from electron images of up to +/- 52 degrees tilted specimens of latticed AChR. Hybrid density maps that include x-ray diffraction perpendicular to the membrane to 12.5 A resolution were used and eliminate some of the distortions introduced in maps based only on electron microscopic analyses. Comparison of the difference Fourier density maps between AChR with its normal complement of associated proteins, and without them shows that the main density, assigned to the actin-binding 43-kD component is closely associated with the lipid bilayer as well as with the cytoplasmic domain of the AChR. It binds beside the AChR, not beneath it as suggested by others (C. Toyoshima and N. Unwin 1988. Nature [Lond.]. 336:237-240). There is good agreement between the volumes of density for structural components and expected volumes based on their molecular weight. Acetylcholine receptors aggregate in the absence of any cytoskeletal proteins, suggesting that the AChR alone is sufficient to encode and stabilize clustering, and perhaps to do so during synaptogenesis. The main 43-kD component may play a role in location and rate of association of AChR. We show that the disulfide bond that cross-links delta-delta chains of adjacent pentamers in about 80% of AChR, is not required to stabilize the lattice of AChR. Latticed tube structures are stable indefinitely. The lattices described here have 20% less volume of lipid than those originally obtained and characterized by J. Kistler and R. M. Stroud (1981. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 78:3678-3682), or those subsequently characterized by A. Brisson and P. N. T. Unwin (1984. J. Cell Biol. 99:1202-1211) and A. Brisson and P. N. T. Unwin (1985. Nature (Lond.). 315:474-477).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (7.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agard D. A. A least-squares method for determining structure factors in three-dimensional tilted-view reconstructions. J Mol Biol. 1983 Jul 15;167(4):849–852. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(83)80114-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agard D. A., Stroud R. M. Linking regions between helices in bacteriorhodopsin revealed. Biophys J. 1982 Mar;37(3):589–602. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrantes F. J., Neugebauer D. C., Zingsheim H. P. Peptide extraction by alkaline treatment is accompanied by rearrangement of the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata. FEBS Lett. 1980 Mar 24;112(1):73–78. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80131-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayne E. K., Anderson M. J., Fambrough D. M. Extracellular matrix organization in developing muscle: correlation with acetylcholine receptor aggregates. J Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;99(4 Pt 1):1486–1501. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.4.1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bon F., Lebrun E., Gomel J., Van Rapenbusch R., Cartaud J., Popot J. L., Changeux J. P. Image analysis of the heavy form of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata. J Mol Biol. 1984 Jun 25;176(2):205–237. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90421-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boulter J., Connolly J., Deneris E., Goldman D., Heinemann S., Patrick J. Functional expression of two neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors from cDNA clones identifies a gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(21):7763–7767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.21.7763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bridgman P. C., Carr C., Pedersen S. E., Cohen J. B. Visualization of the cytoplasmic surface of Torpedo postsynaptic membranes by freeze-etch and immunoelectron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;105(4):1829–1846. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brisson A., Unwin P. N. Quaternary structure of the acetylcholine receptor. Nature. 1985 Jun 6;315(6019):474–477. doi: 10.1038/315474a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brisson A., Unwin P. N. Tubular crystals of acetylcholine receptor. J Cell Biol. 1984 Oct;99(4 Pt 1):1202–1211. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.4.1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burden S. J., DePalma R. L., Gottesman G. S. Crosslinking of proteins in acetylcholine receptor-rich membranes: association between the beta-subunit and the 43 kd subsynaptic protein. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):687–692. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cartaud J., Benedetti E. L. A morphological study of the cholinergic receptor protein from Torpedo marmorata in its membrane environment and in its detergent-extracted purified form. J Cell Sci. 1978 Feb;29:313–337. doi: 10.1242/jcs.29.1.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cartaud J., Benedetti E. L., Cohen J. B., Meunier J. C., Changeux J. P. Presence of a lattice structure in membrane fragments rich in nicotinic receptor protein from the electric organ of Torpedo marmorata. FEBS Lett. 1973 Jun 15;33(1):109–113. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(73)80171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cartaud J., Sobel A., Rousselet A., Devaux P. F., Changeux J. P. Consequences of alkaline treatment for the ultrastructure of the acetylcholine-receptor-rich membranes from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. J Cell Biol. 1981 Aug;90(2):418–426. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.2.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Conti-Tronconi B. M., Raftery M. A. The nicotinic cholinergic receptor: correlation of molecular structure with functional properties. Annu Rev Biochem. 1982;51:491–530. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.002423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dani J. A., Eisenman G. Monovalent and divalent cation permeation in acetylcholine receptor channels. Ion transport related to structure. J Gen Physiol. 1987 Jun;89(6):959–983. doi: 10.1085/jgp.89.6.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dani J. A. Ion-channel entrances influence permeation. Net charge, size, shape, and binding considerations. Biophys J. 1986 Mar;49(3):607–618. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83688-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fairclough R. H., Finer-Moore J., Love R. A., Kristofferson D., Desmeules P. J., Stroud R. M. Subunit organization and structure of an acetylcholine receptor. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1983;48(Pt 1):9–20. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1983.048.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fairclough R. H., Miake-Lye R. C., Stroud R. M., Hodgson K. O., Doniach S. Location of terbium binding sites on acetylcholine receptor-enriched membranes. J Mol Biol. 1986 Jun 20;189(4):673–680. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90497-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Finer-Moore J., Stroud R. M. Amphipathic analysis and possible formation of the ion channel in an acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jan;81(1):155–159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Frail D. E., Mudd J., Shah V., Carr C., Cohen J. B., Merlie J. P. cDNAs for the postsynaptic 43-kDa protein of Torpedo electric organ encode two proteins with different carboxyl termini. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Sep;84(17):6302–6306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Froehner S. C., Gulbrandsen V., Hyman C., Jeng A. Y., Neubig R. R., Cohen J. B. Immunofluorescence localization at the mammalian neuromuscular junction of the Mr 43,000 protein of Torpedo postsynaptic membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Aug;78(8):5230–5234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.8.5230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Froehner S. C., Murnane A. A., Tobler M., Peng H. B., Sealock R. A postsynaptic Mr 58,000 (58K) protein concentrated at acetylcholine receptor-rich sites in Torpedo electroplaques and skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jun;104(6):1633–1646. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.6.1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Giraudat J., Dennis M., Heidmann T., Chang J. Y., Changeux J. P. Structure of the high-affinity binding site for noncompetitive blockers of the acetylcholine receptor: serine-262 of the delta subunit is labeled by [3H]chlorpromazine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(8):2719–2723. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Giraudat J., Dennis M., Heidmann T., Haumont P. Y., Lederer F., Changeux J. P. Structure of the high-affinity binding site for noncompetitive blockers of the acetylcholine receptor: [3H]chlorpromazine labels homologous residues in the beta and delta chains. Biochemistry. 1987 May 5;26(9):2410–2418. doi: 10.1021/bi00383a003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grenningloh G., Rienitz A., Schmitt B., Methfessel C., Zensen M., Beyreuther K., Gundelfinger E. D., Betz H. The strychnine-binding subunit of the glycine receptor shows homology with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nature. 1987 Jul 16;328(6127):215–220. doi: 10.1038/328215a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gysin R., Wirth M., Flanagan S. D. Structural heterogeneity and subcellular distribution of nicotinic synapse-associated proteins. J Biol Chem. 1981 Nov 25;256(22):11373–11376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gysin R., Yost B., Flanagan S. D. Immunochemical and molecular differentiation of 43 000 molecular weight proteins associated with Torpedo neuroelectrocyte synapses. Biochemistry. 1983 Dec 6;22(25):5781–5789. doi: 10.1021/bi00294a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hayward S. B., Stroud R. M. Projected structure of purple membrane determined to 3.7 A resolution by low temperature electron microscopy. J Mol Biol. 1981 Sep 25;151(3):491–517. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Henderson R., Unwin P. N. Three-dimensional model of purple membrane obtained by electron microscopy. Nature. 1975 Sep 4;257(5521):28–32. doi: 10.1038/257028a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Heuser J. E., Salpeter S. R. Organization of acetylcholine receptors in quick-frozen, deep-etched, and rotary-replicated Torpedo postsynaptic membrane. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jul;82(1):150–173. doi: 10.1083/jcb.82.1.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Holtzman E., Wise D., Wall J., Karlin A. Electron microscopy of complexes of isolated acetylcholine receptor, biotinyl-toxin, and avidin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Jan;79(2):310–314. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.2.310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang L. Y., Catterall W. A., Ehrenstein G. Selectivity of cations and nonelectrolytes for acetylcholine-activated channels in cultured muscle cells. J Gen Physiol. 1978 Apr;71(4):397–410. doi: 10.1085/jgp.71.4.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hucho F., Oberthür W., Lottspeich F. The ion channel of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor is formed by the homologous helices M II of the receptor subunits. FEBS Lett. 1986 Sep 1;205(1):137–142. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(86)80881-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Imoto K., Busch C., Sakmann B., Mishina M., Konno T., Nakai J., Bujo H., Mori Y., Fukuda K., Numa S. Rings of negatively charged amino acids determine the acetylcholine receptor channel conductance. Nature. 1988 Oct 13;335(6191):645–648. doi: 10.1038/335645a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Imoto K., Methfessel C., Sakmann B., Mishina M., Mori Y., Konno T., Fukuda K., Kurasaki M., Bujo H., Fujita Y. Location of a delta-subunit region determining ion transport through the acetylcholine receptor channel. Nature. 1986 Dec 18;324(6098):670–674. doi: 10.1038/324670a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jackson M. B. Spontaneous openings of the acetylcholine receptor channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(12):3901–3904. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.12.3901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kistler J., Stroud R. M. Crystalline arrays of membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3678–3682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kistler J., Stroud R. M., Klymkowsky M. W., Lalancette R. A., Fairclough R. H. Structure and function of an acetylcholine receptor. Biophys J. 1982 Jan;37(1):371–383. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(82)84685-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Klymkowsky M. W., Heuser J. E., Stroud R. M. Protease effects on the structure of acetylcholine receptor membranes from Torpedo californica. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jun;85(3):823–838. doi: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Klymkowsky M. W., Stroud R. M. Immunospecific identification and three-dimensional structure of a membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. J Mol Biol. 1979 Mar 5;128(3):319–334. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90091-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kubalek E., Ralston S., Lindstrom J., Unwin N. Location of subunits within the acetylcholine receptor by electron image analysis of tubular crystals from Torpedo marmorata. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):9–18. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. LaRochelle W. J., Froehner S. C. Determination of the tissue distributions and relative concentrations of the postsynaptic 43-kDa protein and the acetylcholine receptor in Torpedo. J Biol Chem. 1986 Apr 25;261(12):5270–5274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lo M. M., Garland P. B., Lamprecht J., Barnard E. A. Rotational mobility of the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor of Torpedo electric organ measured by phosphorescence depolarisation. FEBS Lett. 1980 Mar 10;111(2):407–412. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80838-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mannella C. A. Phospholipase-induced crystallization of channels in mitochondrial outer membranes. Science. 1984 Apr 13;224(4645):165–166. doi: 10.1126/science.6322311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Markwell M. A., Haas S. M., Bieber L. L., Tolbert N. E. A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Anal Biochem. 1978 Jun 15;87(1):206–210. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90586-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Matthews-Bellinger J., Salpeter M. M. Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol. 1978 Jun;279:197–213. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. McCarthy M. P., Earnest J. P., Young E. F., Choe S., Stroud R. M. The molecular neurobiology of the acetylcholine receptor. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1986;9:383–413. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. McCarthy M. P., Stroud R. M. Changes in conformation upon agonist binding, and nonequivalent labeling, of the membrane-spanning regions of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jun 25;264(18):10911–10916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. McCarthy M. P., Stroud R. M. Conformational states of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica induced by the binding of agonists, antagonists, and local anesthetics. Equilibrium measurements using tritium-hydrogen exchange. Biochemistry. 1989 Jan 10;28(1):40–48. doi: 10.1021/bi00427a007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mebs D., Narita K., Iwanaga S., Samejima Y., Lee C. Y. Purification, properties and amino acid sequence of -bungarotoxin from the venom of Bungarus multicinctus. Hoppe Seylers Z Physiol Chem. 1972 Feb;353(2):243–262. doi: 10.1515/bchm2.1972.353.1.243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Neher E., Sakmann B. Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature. 1976 Apr 29;260(5554):799–802. doi: 10.1038/260799a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Neubig R. R., Krodel E. K., Boyd N. D., Cohen J. B. Acetylcholine and local anesthetic binding to Torpedo nicotinic postsynaptic membranes after removal of nonreceptor peptides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Feb;76(2):690–694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.2.690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nghiêm H. O., Cartaud J., Dubreuil C., Kordeli C., Buttin G., Changeux J. P. Production and characterization of a monoclonal antibody directed against the 43,000-dalton v1 polypeptide from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Oct;80(20):6403–6407. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.20.6403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nickel E., Potter L. T. Ultrastructure of isolated membranes of Torpedo electric tissue. Brain Res. 1973 Jul 27;57(2):508–517. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90158-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Noda M., Takahashi H., Tanabe T., Toyosato M., Kikyotani S., Furutani Y., Hirose T., Takashima H., Inayama S., Miyata T. Structural homology of Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor subunits. Nature. 1983 Apr 7;302(5908):528–532. doi: 10.1038/302528a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Oberthür W., Muhn P., Baumann H., Lottspeich F., Wittmann-Liebold B., Hucho F. The reaction site of a non-competitive antagonist in the delta-subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. EMBO J. 1986 Aug;5(8):1815–1819. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04431.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Olek A. J., Ling A., Daniels M. P. Development of ultrastructural specializations during the formation of acetylcholine receptor aggregates on cultured myotubes. J Neurosci. 1986 Feb;6(2):487–497. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-02-00487.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Peng H. B., Froehner S. C. Association of the postsynaptic 43K protein with newly formed acetylcholine receptor clusters in cultured muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1698–1705. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Popot J. L., Changeux J. P. Nicotinic receptor of acetylcholine: structure of an oligomeric integral membrane protein. Physiol Rev. 1984 Oct;64(4):1162–1239. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1984.64.4.1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Porter S., Froehner S. C. Interaction of the 43K protein with components of Torpedo postsynaptic membranes. Biochemistry. 1985 Jan 15;24(2):425–432. doi: 10.1021/bi00323a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Prives J., Fulton A. B., Penman S., Daniels M. P., Christian C. N. Interaction of the cytoskeletal framework with acetylcholine receptor on th surface of embryonic muscle cells in culture. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jan;92(1):231–236. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.1.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Raftery M. A., Hunkapiller M. W., Strader C. D., Hood L. E. Acetylcholine receptor: complex of homologous subunits. Science. 1980 Jun 27;208(4451):1454–1456. doi: 10.1126/science.7384786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Robinson J. P., Schmid M. F., Morgan D. G., Chiu W. Three-dimensional structural analysis of tetanus toxin by electron crystallography. J Mol Biol. 1988 Mar 20;200(2):367–375. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90247-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ross M. J., Klymkowsky M. W., Agard D. A., Stroud R. M. Structural studies of a membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov;116(4):635–659. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90264-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rousselet A., Cartaud J., Devaux P. F., Changeux J. P. The rotational diffusion of the acetylcholine receptor in Torpeda marmorata membrane fragments studied with a spin-labelled alpha-toxin: importance of the 43 000 protein(s). EMBO J. 1982;1(4):439–445. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01188.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Saitoh T., Wennogle L. P., Changeux J. P. Factors regulating the susceptibility of the acetylcholine receptor protein to heat inactivation. FEBS Lett. 1979 Dec 15;108(2):489–494. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(79)80595-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Schmidt J., Raftery M. A. A simple assay for the study of solubilized acetylcholine receptors. Anal Biochem. 1973 Apr;52(2):349–354. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(73)90036-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Schofield P. R., Darlison M. G., Fujita N., Burt D. R., Stephenson F. A., Rodriguez H., Rhee L. M., Ramachandran J., Reale V., Glencorse T. A. Sequence and functional expression of the GABA A receptor shows a ligand-gated receptor super-family. Nature. 1987 Jul 16;328(6127):221–227. doi: 10.1038/328221a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Stroud R. M., Agard D. A. Structure determination of asymmetric membrane profiles using an iterative Fourier method. Biophys J. 1979 Mar;25(3):495–512. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85319-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Stya M., Axelrod D. Mobility and detergent extractability of acetylcholine receptors on cultured rat myotubes: a correlation. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;97(1):48–51. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.1.48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Toyoshima C., Unwin N. Ion channel of acetylcholine receptor reconstructed from images of postsynaptic membranes. Nature. 1988 Nov 17;336(6196):247–250. doi: 10.1038/336247a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Unwin N., Toyoshima C., Kubalek E. Arrangement of the acetylcholine receptor subunits in the resting and desensitized states, determined by cryoelectron microscopy of crystallized Torpedo postsynaptic membranes. J Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;107(3):1123–1138. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.3.1123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Unwin P. N. Beef liver catalase structure: interpretation of electron micrographs. J Mol Biol. 1975 Oct 15;98(1):235–242. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80111-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Walker J. H., Boustead C. M., Witzemann V. The 43-K protein, v1, associated with acetylcholine receptor containing membrane fragments is an actin-binding protein. EMBO J. 1984 Oct;3(10):2287–2290. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02127.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. White B. H., Cohen J. B. Photolabeling of membrane-bound Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor with the hydrophobic probe 3-trifluoromethyl-3-(m-[125I]iodophenyl)diazirine. Biochemistry. 1988 Nov 29;27(24):8741–8751. doi: 10.1021/bi00424a009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Whiting P., Esch F., Shimasaki S., Lindstrom J. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor beta-subunit is coded for by the cDNA clone alpha 4. FEBS Lett. 1987 Jul 27;219(2):459–463. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)80272-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zingsheim H. P., Barrantes F. J., Frank J., Hänicke W., Neugebauer D. C. Direct structural localization of two toxin-recognition sites on an ACh receptor protein. Nature. 1982 Sep 2;299(5878):81–84. doi: 10.1038/299081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ziskind-Conhaim L., Geffen I., Hall Z. W. Redistribution of acetylcholine receptors on developing rat myotubes. J Neurosci. 1984 Sep;4(9):2346–2349. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.04-09-02346.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES