Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1989 Oct 1;109(4):1795–1805. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.4.1795

Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin: quantitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthening response

PMCID: PMC2115812  PMID: 2477381

Abstract

Cell-substratum adhesion strengths have been quantified using fibroblasts and glioma cells binding to two extracellular matrix proteins, fibronectin and tenascin. A centrifugal force-based adhesion assay was used for the adhesive strength measurements, and the corresponding morphology of the adhesions was visualized by interference reflection microscopy. The initial adhesions as measured at 4 degrees C were on the order of 10(-5)dynes/cell and did not involve the cytoskeleton. Adhesion to fibronectin after 15 min at 37 degrees C were more than an order of magnitude stronger; the strengthening response required cytoskeletal involvement. By contrast to the marked strengthening of adhesion to FN, adhesion to TN was unchanged or weakened after 15 min at 37 degrees C. The absolute strength of adhesion achieved varied according to protein and cell type. When a mixed substratum of fibronectin and tenascin was tested, the presence of tenascin was found to reduce the level of the strengthening of cell adhesion normally observed at 37 degrees C on a substratum of fibronectin alone. Parallel analysis of corresponding interference reflection micrographs showed that differences in the area of cell surface within 10-15 nm of the substratum correlated closely with each of the changes in adhesion observed: after incubation for 15 min on fibronectin at 37 degrees C, glioma cells increased their surface area within close contact to the substrate by integral to 125- fold. Cells on tenascin did not increase their surface area of contact. The increased surface area of contact and the inhibitory activity of cytochalasin b suggest that the adhesive "strengthening" in the 15 min after initial binding brings additional adhesion molecules into the adhesive site and couples the actin cytoskeleton to the adhesion complex.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Badley R. A., Lloyd C. W., Woods A., Carruthers L., Allcock C., Rees D. A. Mechanisms of cellular adhesion. III. Preparation and preliminary characterisation of adhesions. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Dec;117(2):231–244. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90136-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell G. I. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science. 1978 May 12;200(4342):618–627. doi: 10.1126/science.347575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourdon M. A., Matthews T. J., Pizzo S. V., Bigner D. D. Immunochemical and biochemical characterization of a glioma-associated extracellular matrix glycoprotein. J Cell Biochem. 1985;28(3):183–195. doi: 10.1002/jcb.240280302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourdon M. A., Ruoslahti E. Tenascin mediates cell attachment through an RGD-dependent receptor. J Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;108(3):1149–1155. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.3.1149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brackenbury R., Rutishauser U., Edelman G. M. Distinct calcium-independent and calcium-dependent adhesion systems of chicken embryo cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):387–391. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bronner-Fraser M. Distribution and function of tenascin during cranial neural crest development in the chick. J Neurosci Res. 1988 Oct-Dec;21(2-4):135–147. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490210206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buck C. A., Horwitz A. F. Integrin, a transmembrane glycoprotein complex mediating cell-substratum adhesion. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1987;8:231–250. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1987.supplement_8.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burn P., Kupfer A., Singer S. J. Dynamic membrane-cytoskeletal interactions: specific association of integrin and talin arises in vivo after phorbol ester treatment of peripheral blood lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jan;85(2):497–501. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.2.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Burridge K., Molony L., Kelly T. Adhesion plaques: sites of transmembrane interaction between the extracellular matrix and the actin cytoskeleton. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1987;8:211–229. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1987.supplement_8.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carter W. G., Rauvala H., Hakomori S. I. Studies on cell adhesion and recognition. II. The kinetics of cell adhesion and cell spreading on surfaces coated with carbohydrate-reactive proteins (glycosidases and lectins) and fibronectin. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jan;88(1):138–148. doi: 10.1083/jcb.88.1.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen W. T., Hasegawa E., Hasegawa T., Weinstock C., Yamada K. M. Development of cell surface linkage complexes in cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1103–1114. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen W. T., Singer S. J. Immunoelectron microscopic studies of the sites of cell-substratum and cell-cell contacts in cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1982 Oct;95(1):205–222. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen W. T., Wang J., Hasegawa T., Yamada S. S., Yamada K. M. Regulation of fibronectin receptor distribution by transformation, exogenous fibronectin, and synthetic peptides. J Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;103(5):1649–1661. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.5.1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Kalla P., Pearson C. A., Beck K., Chiquet M. Tenascin interferes with fibronectin action. Cell. 1988 May 6;53(3):383–390. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90158-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Mackie E. J., Pearson C. A., Sakakura T. Tenascin: an extracellular matrix protein involved in tissue interactions during fetal development and oncogenesis. Cell. 1986 Oct 10;47(1):131–139. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90374-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chiquet M., Fambrough D. M. Chick myotendinous antigen. I. A monoclonal antibody as a marker for tendon and muscle morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;98(6):1926–1936. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.6.1926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Couchman J. R., Rees D. A., Green M. R., Smith C. G. Fibronectin has a dual role in locomotion and anchorage of primary chick fibroblasts and can promote entry into the division cycle. J Cell Biol. 1982 May;93(2):402–410. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Crossin K. L., Hoffman S., Grumet M., Thiery J. P., Edelman G. M. Site-restricted expression of cytotactin during development of the chicken embryo. J Cell Biol. 1986 May;102(5):1917–1930. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.5.1917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. David-Pfeuty T. The coordinate organization of vinculin and of actin filaments during the early stages of fibroblast spreading on a substratum. Eur J Cell Biol. 1985 Mar;36(2):195–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duband J. L., Nuckolls G. H., Ishihara A., Hasegawa T., Yamada K. M., Thiery J. P., Jacobson K. Fibronectin receptor exhibits high lateral mobility in embryonic locomoting cells but is immobile in focal contacts and fibrillar streaks in stationary cells. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1385–1396. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Erickson H. P. Co-operativity in protein-protein association. The structure and stability of the actin filament. J Mol Biol. 1989 Apr 5;206(3):465–474. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90494-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Erickson H. P., Inglesias J. L. A six-armed oligomer isolated from cell surface fibronectin preparations. Nature. 1984 Sep 20;311(5983):267–269. doi: 10.1038/311267a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Erickson H. P., Taylor H. C. Hexabrachion proteins in embryonic chicken tissues and human tumors. J Cell Biol. 1987 Sep;105(3):1387–1394. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.3.1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Friedlander D. R., Hoffman S., Edelman G. M. Functional mapping of cytotactin: proteolytic fragments active in cell-substrate adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 1):2329–2340. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grinnell F. Fibroblast receptor for cell-substratum adhesion: studies on the interaction of baby hamster kidney cells with latex beads coated by cold insoluble globulin (plasma fibronectin). J Cell Biol. 1980 Jul;86(1):104–112. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.1.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grinnell F. Studies on the mechanism of cell attachment to a substratum with serum in the medium: further evidence supporting a requirement for two biochemically distinct processes. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1974 Dec;165(2):524–530. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(74)90278-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grumet M., Hoffman S., Crossin K. L., Edelman G. M. Cytotactin, an extracellular matrix protein of neural and non-neural tissues that mediates glia-neuron interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(23):8075–8079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.23.8075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Heath J. P., Dunn G. A. Cell to substratum contacts of chick fibroblasts and their relation to the microfilament system. A correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage electron-microscope study. J Cell Sci. 1978 Feb;29:197–212. doi: 10.1242/jcs.29.1.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoffman S., Edelman G. M. A proteoglycan with HNK-1 antigenic determinants is a neuron-associated ligand for cytotactin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(8):2523–2527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.8.2523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Horwitz A., Duggan K., Buck C., Beckerle M. C., Burridge K. Interaction of plasma membrane fibronectin receptor with talin--a transmembrane linkage. Nature. 1986 Apr 10;320(6062):531–533. doi: 10.1038/320531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hughes R. C., Pena S. D., Clark J., Dourmashkin R. R. Molecular requirements for adhesion and spreading of hamster fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Jul;121(2):307–314. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90009-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hynes R. O., Destree A. T. Relationships between fibronectin (LETS protein) and actin. Cell. 1978 Nov;15(3):875–886. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90272-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Izzard C. S., Lochner L. R. Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. J Cell Sci. 1976 Jun;21(1):129–159. doi: 10.1242/jcs.21.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Juliano R. L., Gagalang E. The adhension of Chinese hamster cells. I. Effects of temperature, metabolic inhibitors and proteolytic dissection of cell surface macromolecules. J Cell Physiol. 1977 Aug;92(2):209–220. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040920209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kruse J., Keilhauer G., Faissner A., Timpl R., Schachner M. The J1 glycoprotein--a novel nervous system cell adhesion molecule of the L2/HNK-1 family. Nature. 1985 Jul 11;316(6024):146–148. doi: 10.1038/316146a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mackie E. J., Thesleff I., Chiquet-Ehrismann R. Tenascin is associated with chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation in vivo and promotes chondrogenesis in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1987 Dec;105(6 Pt 1):2569–2579. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.6.2569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mackie E. J., Tucker R. P., Halfter W., Chiquet-Ehrismann R., Epperlein H. H. The distribution of tenascin coincides with pathways of neural crest cell migration. Development. 1988 Jan;102(1):237–250. doi: 10.1242/dev.102.1.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McClay D. R., Wessel G. M., Marchase R. B. Intercellular recognition: quantitation of initial binding events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Aug;78(8):4975–4979. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.8.4975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Norton E. K., Izzard C. S. Fibronectin promotes formation of the close cell-to-substrate contact in cultured cells. Exp Cell Res. 1982 Jun;139(2):463–467. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(82)90282-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rees D. A., Couchman J. R., Smith C. G., Woods A., Wilson G. Cell-substratum interactions in the adhesion and locomotion of fibroblasts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Nov 4;299(1095):169–176. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rees D. A., Lloyd C. W., Thom D. Control of grip and stick in cell adhesion through lateral relationships of membrane glycoproteins. Nature. 1977 May 12;267(5607):124–128. doi: 10.1038/267124a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ruoslahti E., Hayman E. G., Pierschbacher M., Engvall E. Fibronectin: purification, immunochemical properties, and biological activities. Methods Enzymol. 1982;82(Pt A):803–831. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(82)82103-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schwarz M. A., Juliano R. L. Interaction of fibronectin-coated beads with CHO cells. Exp Cell Res. 1984 Jun;152(2):302–312. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(84)90632-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Singer I. I. Association of fibronectin and vinculin with focal contacts and stress fibers in stationary hamster fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1982 Feb;92(2):398–408. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Singer I. I., Kawka D. W., Scott S., Mumford R. A., Lark M. W. The fibronectin cell attachment sequence Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser promotes focal contact formation during early fibroblast attachment and spreading. J Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;104(3):573–584. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tan S. S., Crossin K. L., Hoffman S., Edelman G. M. Asymmetric expression in somites of cytotactin and its proteoglycan ligand is correlated with neural crest cell distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Nov;84(22):7977–7981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.22.7977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Umbreit J., Roseman S. A requirement for reversible binding between aggregating embryonic cells before stable adhesion. J Biol Chem. 1975 Dec 25;250(24):9360–9368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Virtanen I., Vartio T., Badley R. A., Lehto V. P. Fibronectin in adhesion, spreading and cytoskeletal organization of cultured fibroblasts. Nature. 1982 Aug 12;298(5875):660–663. doi: 10.1038/298660a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Weber K., Rathke P. C., Osborn M., Franke W. W. Distribution of actin and tubulin in cells and in glycerinated cell models after treatment with cytochalasin B (CB). Exp Cell Res. 1976 Oct 15;102(2):285–297. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90044-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Woods A., Smith C. G., Rees D. A., Wilson G. Stages in specialization of fibroblast adhesion and deposition of extracellular matrix. Eur J Cell Biol. 1983 Nov;32(1):108–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES