Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1989 Dec 1;109(6):2951–2961. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.2951

rough deal: a gene required for proper mitotic segregation in Drosophila

PMCID: PMC2115894  PMID: 2512302

Abstract

We describe a genetic locus rough deal (rod) in Drosophila melanogaster, identified by mutations that interfere with the faithful transmission of chromosomes to daughter cells during mitosis. Five mutant alleles were isolated, each associated with a similar set of mitotic abnormalities in the dividing neuroblasts of homozygous mutant larvae: high frequencies of aneuploid cells and abnormal anaphase figures, in which chromatids may lag, form bridges, or completely fail to separate. Surviving homozygous adults are sterile, and show cuticular defects associated with cell death, i.e., roughened eyes, sparse abdominal bristles, and notched wing margins. The morphological process of spermatogenesis is largely unaffected and motile sperm are produced, but meiocyte aneuploidy is common. The nature of the observed abnormalities in mitotic cells suggests that the reduced fidelity of chromosome transmission to the daughter cells is due to a failure in a mechanism involved in assuring the proper release of sister chromatids.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.9 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker B. S., Carpenter A. T., Ripoll P. The Utilization during Mitotic Cell Division of Loci Controlling Meiotic Recombination and Disjunction in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1978 Nov;90(3):531–578. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.3.531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biggs J., Tripoulas N., Hersperger E., Dearolf C., Shearn A. Analysis of the lethal interaction between the prune and Killer of prune mutations of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1988 Oct;2(10):1333–1343. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.10.1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson J. G. Mitotic Behavior of Induced Chromosomal Fragments Lacking Spindle Attachments in the Neuroblasts of the Grasshopper. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1938 Nov;24(11):500–507. doi: 10.1073/pnas.24.11.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooke C. A., Heck M. M., Earnshaw W. C. The inner centromere protein (INCENP) antigens: movement from inner centromere to midbody during mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2053–2067. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Directory of members, Genetics Society of America. Genetics. 1980;94(4 Pt 2 Suppl):135–175. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Earnshaw W. C., Heck M. M. Localization of topoisomerase II in mitotic chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1716–1725. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frisardi M. C., MacIntyre R. J. Position effect variegation of an acid phosphatase gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;197(3):403–413. doi: 10.1007/BF00329936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gatti M., Baker B. S. Genes controlling essential cell-cycle functions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1989 Apr;3(4):438–453. doi: 10.1101/gad.3.4.438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gatti M., Tanzarella C., Olivieri G. Analysis of the chromosome aberrations induced by x-rays in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1974 Aug;77(4):701–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/77.4.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Glover D. M. Mitosis in Drosophila. J Cell Sci. 1989 Feb;92(Pt 2):137–146. doi: 10.1242/jcs.92.2.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldstein L. S. Mechanisms of chromosome orientation revealed by two meiotic mutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma. 1980;78(1):79–111. doi: 10.1007/BF00291909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gorbsky G. J., Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately disassemble from their kinetochore ends. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jan;104(1):9–18. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hardy R. W., Tokuyasu K. T., Lindsley D. L. Analysis of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster bearing deletions for Y-chromosome fertility genes. Chromosoma. 1981;83(5):593–617. doi: 10.1007/BF00328522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartwell L. H., Smith D. Altered fidelity of mitotic chromosome transmission in cell cycle mutants of S. cerevisiae. Genetics. 1985 Jul;110(3):381–395. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.3.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hirano T., Hiraoka Y., Yanagida M. A temperature-sensitive mutation of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe gene nuc2+ that encodes a nuclear scaffold-like protein blocks spindle elongation in mitotic anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1988 Apr;106(4):1171–1183. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.4.1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Holm C., Goto T., Wang J. C., Botstein D. DNA topoisomerase II is required at the time of mitosis in yeast. Cell. 1985 Jun;41(2):553–563. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huffaker T. C., Hoyt M. A., Botstein D. Genetic analysis of the yeast cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Genet. 1987;21:259–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.21.120187.001355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kemphues K. J., Kaufman T. C., Raff R. A., Raff E. C. The testis-specific beta-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell. 1982 Dec;31(3 Pt 2):655–670. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90321-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kongsuwan K., Dellavalle R. P., Merriam J. R. Deficiency Analysis of the Tip of Chromosome 3R in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):539–550. doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.3.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lifschytz E., Hareven D. Gene expression and the control of spermatid morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1977 Jul 15;58(2):276–294. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90092-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin H. P., Church K. Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster, III. The effect of orientation disruptor (ord) on gonial mitotic and the meiotic divisions in males. Genetics. 1982 Dec;102(4):751–770. doi: 10.1093/genetics/102.4.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lindsley D. L., Sandler L., Baker B. S., Carpenter A. T., Denell R. E., Hall J. C., Jacobs P. A., Miklos G. L., Davis B. K., Gethmann R. C. Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome. Genetics. 1972 May;71(1):157–184. doi: 10.1093/genetics/71.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McGill M., Pathak S., Hsu T. C. Effects of ethidium bromide on mitosis and chromosomes: a possible material basis for chromosome stickiness. Chromosoma. 1974;47(2):157–166. doi: 10.1007/BF00331803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitchison T., Evans L., Schulze E., Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. NICKLAS R. B. A quantitative study of chromosomal elasticity and its influence on chromosome movement. Chromosoma. 1963;14:276–295. doi: 10.1007/BF00326816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nicklas R. B. Measurements of the force produced by the mitotic spindle in anaphase. J Cell Biol. 1983 Aug;97(2):542–548. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.2.542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nicklas R. B. The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:431–449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.002243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nolan J. M., Lee M. P., Wyckoff E., Hsieh T. S. Isolation and characterization of the gene encoding Drosophila DNA topoisomerase II. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jun;83(11):3664–3668. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.11.3664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ohkura H., Adachi Y., Kinoshita N., Niwa O., Toda T., Yanagida M. Cold-sensitive and caffeine-supersensitive mutants of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe dis genes implicated in sister chromatid separation during mitosis. EMBO J. 1988 May;7(5):1465–1473. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02964.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ripoll P., Pimpinelli S., Valdivia M. M., Avila J. A cell division mutant of Drosophila with a functionally abnormal spindle. Cell. 1985 Jul;41(3):907–912. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80071-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Shearn A., Rice T., Garen A., Gehring W. Imaginal disc abnormalities in lethal mutants of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Oct;68(10):2594–2598. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.10.2594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith D. A., Baker B. S., Gatti M. Mutations in genes encoding essential mitotic functions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1985 Aug;110(4):647–670. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.4.647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Strecker T. R., Merriam J. R., Lengyel J. A. Graded requirement for the zygotic terminal gene, tailless, in the brain and tail region of the Drosophila embryo. Development. 1988 Apr;102(4):721–734. doi: 10.1242/dev.102.4.721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sunkel C. E., Glover D. M. polo, a mitotic mutant of Drosophila displaying abnormal spindle poles. J Cell Sci. 1988 Jan;89(Pt 1):25–38. doi: 10.1242/jcs.89.1.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thomas J. H., Botstein D. A gene required for the separation of chromosomes on the spindle apparatus in yeast. Cell. 1986 Jan 17;44(1):65–76. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90485-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES