Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1989 Dec 1;109(6):3015–3026. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.3015

Gap junctional communication in the extraembryonic tissues of the gastrulating mouse embryo

PMCID: PMC2115942  PMID: 2592411

Abstract

We characterized gap junctional communication in the extraembryonic tissues of the 7.5-d gastrulating mouse embryo. At this stage of development, the extraembryonic tissues form a large part of the conceptus, and link the embryo proper to the maternal tissue. Using Lucifer yellow injections, cells in most extraembryonic tissues were observed to be very well dye coupled, the only exception being the peripheral regions of the ectoplacental cone. Of particular interest was the fact that no dye coupling was detected between the three major extraembryonic tissues. Thus, the extraembryonic ectoderm (EEC), the extraembryonic endoderm (EEN), and the ectoplacental cone (EPC) corresponded to separate communication compartments, with the EPC being further subdivided into three compartments. Interestingly, the EEN was observed to exhibit a very low level of dye coupling with the adjacent visceral embryonic endoderm (EN), and consistent with the latter dye coupling results was the finding that the EEN was ionically coupled to the EN, but not with any other extraembryonic tissues. However, in the EPC, ionic coupling studies show that the central region was well coupled ionically to the EEC, but only weakly coupled to the peripheral EPC. These findings, in conjunction with our previous study (1988. J. Cell Biol. 107:241-255), demonstrate that the 7.5-d mouse conceptus is subdivided into at least nine major Lucifer yellow-delineated communication compartments, with ionic coupling across some of these compartments effectively unifying the embryo into two large domains corresponding to the embryo proper and the major extraembryonic tissues.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.8 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caveney S. The role of gap junctions in development. Annu Rev Physiol. 1985;47:319–335. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.47.030185.001535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Green C. R. Evidence mounts for the role of gap junctions during development. Bioessays. 1988 Jan;8(1):7–10. doi: 10.1002/bies.950080103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ilgren E. B. On the control of the trophoblastic giant-cell transformation in the mouse: homotypic cellular interactions and polyploidy. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981 Apr;62:183–202. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson M. H., Rossant J. Molecular studies on cells of the trophectodermal lineage of the postimplantation mouse embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981 Feb;61:103–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kalimi G. H., Lo C. W. Communication compartments in the gastrulating mouse embryo. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jul;107(1):241–255. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.1.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee S., Gilula N. B., Warner A. E. Gap junctional communication and compaction during preimplantation stages of mouse development. Cell. 1987 Dec 4;51(5):851–860. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90108-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lescisin K. R., Varmuza S., Rossant J. Isolation and characterization of a novel trophoblast-specific cDNA in the mouse. Genes Dev. 1988 Dec;2(12A):1639–1646. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.12a.1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lo C. W., Gilula N. B. Gap junctional communication in the post-implantation mouse embryo. Cell. 1979 Oct;18(2):411–422. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90060-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lo C. W., Gilula N. B. Gap junctional communication in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Cell. 1979 Oct;18(2):399–409. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90059-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Loewenstein W. R. Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel. Physiol Rev. 1981 Oct;61(4):829–913. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1981.61.4.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Niswander L., Yee D., Rinchik E. M., Russell L. B., Magnuson T. The albino deletion complex and early postimplantation survival in the mouse. Development. 1988 Jan;102(1):45–53. doi: 10.1242/dev.102.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rossant J., Tamura-Lis W. Effect of culture conditions on diploid to giant-cell transformation in postimplantation mouse trophoblast. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981 Apr;62:217–227. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tachi S., Tachi C., Lindner H. R. Ultrastructural features of blastocyst attachment and trophoblastic invasion in the rat. J Reprod Fertil. 1970 Feb;21(1):37–56. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0210037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thomson J. A., Solter D. The developmental fate of androgenetic, parthenogenetic, and gynogenetic cells in chimeric gastrulating mouse embryos. Genes Dev. 1988 Oct;2(10):1344–1351. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.10.1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES