Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1990 Feb 1;110(2):405–415. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.2.405

Parthenogenesis in Xenopus eggs requires centrosomal integrity

PMCID: PMC2116007  PMID: 2298811

Abstract

Xenopus eggs are laid arrested at second metaphase of meiosis lacking a functional centrosome. Upon fertilization, the sperm provides the active centrosome that is required for cleavage to occur. The injection of purified centrosomes mimics fertilization and leads to tadpole formation (parthenogenesis). In this work we show that the parthenogenetic activity of centrosomes is inactivated by urea concentrations higher than 2 M. The loss of activity is correlated with a progressive destruction of the centriolar cylinder and extraction of proteins. This shows that centrosomes are relatively sensitive to urea since complete protein unfolding and solubilization of proteins normally occurs at urea concentrations as high as 8-10 M. When present, the parthenogenetic activity is always associated with a pelletable fraction showing that it cannot be solubilized by urea. The parthenogenetic activity is progressively inactivated by salt concentrations higher than 2 M (NaCl or KCl). However, only a few proteins are extracted by these treatments and the centrosome ultrastructure is not affected. This shows that both parthenogenetic activity and centrosomal structure are resistant to relatively high ionic strength. Indeed, most protein structures held by electrostatic forces are dissociated by 2 M salt. The loss of parthenogenetic activity produced at higher salt concentrations, while the structure of the centrosome is unaffected, is an apparent paradox. We interpret this result as meaning that the native state of centrosomes is held together by forces that favor functional denaturation by high ionic strength. The respective effects of urea and salts on centrosomal structure and activity suggest that the centrosome is mainly held together by hydrogen and hydrophobic bonds. The in vitro microtubule nucleating activity of centrosomes can be inactivated at salt or urea concentrations that do not affect the parthenogenetic activity. Since egg cleavage requires the formation of microtubule asters, we conclude that the extracted or denatured microtubule nucleating activity of centrosomes can be complemented by components present in the egg cytoplasm. Both parthenogenetic and microtubule nucleating activities are abolished by protease treatments but resist nuclease action. Since we find no RNA in centrosomes treated by RNase, they probably do not contain a protected RNA. Taken together, these results are consistent with the idea that the whole or part of the centrosome structure acts as a seed to start the centrosome duplication cycle in Xenopus eggs.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bornens M., Paintrand M., Berges J., Marty M. C., Karsenti E. Structural and chemical characterization of isolated centrosomes. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1987;8(3):238–249. doi: 10.1002/cm.970080305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Busa W. B., Nuccitelli R. An elevated free cytosolic Ca2+ wave follows fertilization in eggs of the frog, Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1325–1329. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Calarco-Gillam P. D., Siebert M. C., Hubble R., Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Centrosome development in early mouse embryos as defined by an autoantibody against pericentriolar material. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):621–629. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90094-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Capoly J. P., Picard A., Peaucellier G., Labbé J. C., Dorée M. Changes in the activity of the maturation-promoting factor during meiotic maturation and following activation of amphibian and starfish oocytes: their correlations with protein phosphorylation. Dev Biol. 1986 Sep;117(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90342-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans L., Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Influence of the centrosome on the structure of nucleated microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1185–1191. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gerhart J., Wu M., Kirschner M. Cell cycle dynamics of an M-phase-specific cytoplasmic factor in Xenopus laevis oocytes and eggs. J Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;98(4):1247–1255. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.4.1247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gosti-Testu F., Marty M. C., Berges J., Maunoury R., Bornens M. Identification of centrosomal proteins in a human lymphoblastic cell line. EMBO J. 1986 Oct;5(10):2545–2550. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04533.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall J. L., Ramanis Z., Luck D. J. Basal body/centriolar DNA: molecular genetic studies in Chlamydomonas. Cell. 1989 Oct 6;59(1):121–132. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90875-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hara K., Tydeman P., Kirschner M. A cytoplasmic clock with the same period as the division cycle in Xenopus eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jan;77(1):462–466. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.1.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heidemann S. R., Sander G., Kirschner M. W. Evidence for a functional role of RNA in centrioles. Cell. 1977 Mar;10(3):337–350. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90021-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kallenbach R. J. Ultrastructural analysis of the initiation and development of cytasters in sea-urchin eggs. J Cell Sci. 1985 Feb;73:261–278. doi: 10.1242/jcs.73.1.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karsenti E., Bravo R., Kirschner M. Phosphorylation changes associated with the early cell cycle in Xenopus eggs. Dev Biol. 1987 Feb;119(2):442–453. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90048-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karsenti E., Newport J., Hubble R., Kirschner M. Interconversion of metaphase and interphase microtubule arrays, as studied by the injection of centrosomes and nuclei into Xenopus eggs. J Cell Biol. 1984 May;98(5):1730–1745. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.5.1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaufmann S. H., Coffey D. S., Shaper J. H. Considerations in the isolation of rat liver nuclear matrix, nuclear envelope, and pore complex lamina. Exp Cell Res. 1981 Mar;132(1):105–123. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90088-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kubota H. Y., Yoshimoto Y., Yoneda M., Hiramoto Y. Free calcium wave upon activation in Xenopus eggs. Dev Biol. 1987 Jan;119(1):129–136. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90214-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuriyama R. Activity and stability of centrosomes in Chinese hamster ovary cells in nucleation of microtubules in vitro. J Cell Sci. 1984 Mar;66:277–295. doi: 10.1242/jcs.66.1.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuriyama R., Borisy G. G. Cytasters induced within unfertilized sea-urchin eggs. J Cell Sci. 1983 May;61:175–189. doi: 10.1242/jcs.61.1.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lohka M. J., Masui Y. Formation in vitro of sperm pronuclei and mitotic chromosomes induced by amphibian ooplasmic components. Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):719–721. doi: 10.1126/science.6601299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Maller J., Poccia D., Nishioka D., Kidd P., Gerhart J., Hartman H. Spindle formation and cleavage in Xenopus eggs injected with centriole-containing fractions from sperm. Exp Cell Res. 1976 May;99(2):285–294. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(76)90585-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mangeat P. H., Burridge K. Immunoprecipitation of nonerythrocyte spectrin within live cells following microinjection of specific antibodies: relation to cytoskeletal structures. J Cell Biol. 1984 Apr;98(4):1363–1377. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.4.1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maro B., Howlett S. K., Webb M. Non-spindle microtubule organizing centers in metaphase II-arrested mouse oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1985 Nov;101(5 Pt 1):1665–1672. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.5.1665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Meyerhof P. G., Masui Y. Ca and Mg control of cytostatic factors from Rana pipiens oocytes which cause metaphase and cleavage arrest. Dev Biol. 1977 Dec;61(2):214–229. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90293-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Microtubule assembly nucleated by isolated centrosomes. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):232–237. doi: 10.1038/312232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Newmeyer D. D., Lucocq J. M., Bürglin T. R., De Robertis E. M. Assembly in vitro of nuclei active in nuclear protein transport: ATP is required for nucleoplasmin accumulation. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):501–510. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04239.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Newport J. W., Kirschner M. W. Regulation of the cell cycle during early Xenopus development. Cell. 1984 Jul;37(3):731–742. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90409-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Newport J. Nuclear reconstitution in vitro: stages of assembly around protein-free DNA. Cell. 1987 Jan 30;48(2):205–217. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Porzio M. A., Pearson A. M. Improved resolution of myofibrillar proteins with sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Jan 25;490(1):27–34. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(77)90102-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Regnouf F., Nguyen E., Cassoly R., Pradel L. A. Pig thyroid spectrin. A membrane-associated protein related in structure and function to brain spectrin. Eur J Biochem. 1985 Dec 2;153(2):313–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb09303.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schatten H., Schatten G., Mazia D., Balczon R., Simerly C. Behavior of centrosomes during fertilization and cell division in mouse oocytes and in sea urchin eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Jan;83(1):105–109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.1.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Scheer U., Trendelenburg M. F., Franke W. W. Regulation of transcription of genes of ribosomal rna during amphibian oogenesis. A biochemical and morphological study. J Cell Biol. 1976 May;69(2):465–489. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.2.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Switzer R. C., 3rd, Merril C. R., Shifrin S. A highly sensitive silver stain for detecting proteins and peptides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1979 Sep 15;98(1):231–237. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(79)90732-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Szollosi D., Calarco P., Donahue R. P. Absence of centrioles in the first and second meiotic spindles of mouse oocytes. J Cell Sci. 1972 Sep;11(2):521–541. doi: 10.1242/jcs.11.2.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vorobjev I. A., Nadezhdina E. S. The centrosome and its role in the organization of microtubules. Int Rev Cytol. 1987;106:227–293. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61714-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES