Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1990 Apr 1;110(4):1187–1198. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.4.1187

Biogenesis of transverse tubules: immunocytochemical localization of a transverse tubular protein (TS28) and a sarcolemmal protein (SL50) in rabbit skeletal muscle developing in situ

PMCID: PMC2116107  PMID: 2139033

Abstract

To study the biogenesis of transverse tubules, the temporal appearance and distribution of TS28 (a specific marker of transverse tubules absent from the sarcolemma in adult skeletal muscle; 28,000 Mr) and SL50 (specifically associated with the sarcolemma and absent from the region of the transverse tubules in adult rabbit skeletal muscle) (Jorgensen, A.O., W. Arnold, A. C.-Y. Shen, S. Yuan, M. Gaver, and K.P. Campbell. 1990. J. Cell Biol. 110:1173-1185) were determined in rabbit skeletal muscle developing in situ (day 17 of gestation to day 15 newborn) by indirect immunofluorescence labeling. The results presented show that the temporal appearance and subcellular distribution of TS28 is distinct from that of SL50 at the developmental stages examined. TS28 was first detected in some, but not all, multinucleated myotubes on day 17 of gestation. At this stage of development, SL50 and the Ca2(+)-ATPase of the sarcoplasmic reticulum were already present in all myotubes. TS28 first appeared in discrete foci mostly confined to the cell periphery of the myotubes. At subsequent stages of development (days 19-24 of gestation), TS28 was also found in shoft finger-like structures extending obliquely and transversely from the cell periphery towards the center of the myotubes. 1-2 d after birth, TS28 was observed in an anastomosing network composed of transversely oriented chickenwire-like networks extending throughout the cytoplasm and interconnected by longitudinally oriented fiber-like structures. As development proceeded, the transversely oriented network became increasingly dominant. By day 10 of postnatal development, the longitudinally oriented component of the tubular network was not regularly observed. At none of the developmental stages examined was TS28 observed to be uniformly distributed at the cell periphery. SL50, like TS28, first appeared in discrete foci at the cell periphery. However, shortly after its first appearance it appeared to be distributed along the entire cell periphery. Although the intensity of SL50 labeling increased with development, it remained confined to the sarcolemma and was absent from the interior regions of the myofibers, where transverse tubules were present at all subsequent developmental stages examined. Immunoblotting of cell extracts from skeletal muscle tissue at various stages of development showed that SL50 was first detected on day 24 of gestation, while TS28 was not detected until days 1-2 after birth. Comparison of these results with previous ultrastructural studies of the formation of transverse tubules supports the idea that the temporal appearance and subcellular distribution of TS28 correspond very closely to that of the distribution of forming transverse tubules in rabbit skeletal muscle developing in situ.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. FRANZINI-ARMSTRONG C., PORTER K. R. SARCOLEMMAL INVAGINATIONS CONSTITUTING THE T SYSTEM IN FISH MUSCLE FIBERS. J Cell Biol. 1964 Sep;22:675–696. doi: 10.1083/jcb.22.3.675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ishikawa H. Formation of elaborate networks of T-system tubules in cultured skeletal muscle with special reference to the T-system formation. J Cell Biol. 1968 Jul;38(1):51–66. doi: 10.1083/jcb.38.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jorgensen A. O., Arnold W., Pepper D. R., Kahl S. D., Mandel F., Campbell K. P. A monoclonal antibody to the Ca2+-ATPase of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum cross-reacts with slow type I but not with fast type II canine skeletal muscle fibers: an immunocytochemical and immunochemical study. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;9(2):164–174. doi: 10.1002/cm.970090208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jorgensen A. O., Arnold W., Shen A. C., Yuan S. H., Gaver M., Campbell K. P. Identification of novel proteins unique to either transverse tubules (TS28) or the sarcolemma (SL50) in rabbit skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1990 Apr;110(4):1173–1185. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.4.1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jorgensen A. O., Kalnins V. I., Zubrzycka E., MacLennan D. H. Assembly of the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Localization by immunofluorescence of sarcoplasmic reticulum proteins in differentiating rat skeletal muscle cell cultures. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jul;74(1):287–298. doi: 10.1083/jcb.74.1.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jorgensen A. O., Kalnins V., MacLennan D. H. Localization of sarcoplasmic reticulum proteins in rat skeletal muscle by immunofluorescence. J Cell Biol. 1979 Feb;80(2):372–384. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.2.372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jorgensen A. O., Shen A. C., Arnold W., Leung A. T., Campbell K. P. Subcellular distribution of the 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor in rabbit skeletal muscle in situ: an immunofluorescence and immunocolloidal gold-labeling study. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jul;109(1):135–147. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jorgensen A. O., Shen A. C., MacLennan D. H., Tokuyasu K. T. Ultrastructural localization of the Ca2+ + Mg2+-dependent ATPase of sarcoplasmic reticulum in rat skeletal muscle by immunoferritin labeling of ultrathin frozen sections. J Cell Biol. 1982 Feb;92(2):409–416. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.2.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaprielian Z., Fambrough D. M. Expression of fast and slow isoforms of the Ca2+-ATPase in developing chick skeletal muscle. Dev Biol. 1987 Dec;124(2):490–503. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90502-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelly A. M., Zacks S. I. The histogenesis of rat intercostal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jul;42(1):135–153. doi: 10.1083/jcb.42.1.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kilarski W., Jakubowska M. An electron microscope study of myofibril formation in embryonic rabbit skeletal muscle. Z Mikrosk Anat Forsch. 1979;93(6):1159–1181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Linsenmayer T. F., Fitch J. M., Schmid T. M. Multiple-reaction cycling: a method for enhancement of the immunochemical signal of monoclonal antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem. 1988 Aug;36(8):1075–1078. doi: 10.1177/36.8.3292645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McLennan I. S. Differentiation of muscle fiber types in the chicken hindlimb. Dev Biol. 1983 May;97(1):222–228. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90079-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosemblatt M., Hidalgo C., Vergara C., Ikemoto N. Immunological and biochemical properties of transverse tubule membranes isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 1981 Aug 10;256(15):8140–8148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schiaffino S., Margreth A. Coordinated development of the sarcoplasmic reticulum and T system during postnatal differentiation of rat skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1969 Jun;41(3):855–875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.41.3.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stefani E., Chiarandini D. J. Ionic channels in skeletal muscle. Annu Rev Physiol. 1982;44:357–372. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.44.030182.002041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. White J. G., Amos W. B., Fordham M. An evaluation of confocal versus conventional imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):41–48. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.1.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES