Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1990 Jun 1;110(6):2061–2071. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.6.2061

A protein homologous to the Torpedo postsynaptic 58K protein is present at the myotendinous junction

PMCID: PMC2116121  PMID: 2112550

Abstract

The 58K protein is a peripheral membrane protein enriched in the acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-rich postsynaptic membrane of Torpedo electric organ. Because of its coexistence with AChRs in the postsynaptic membrane in both electrocytes and skeletal muscle, it is thought to be involved in the formation and maintenance of AChR clusters. Using an mAb against the 58K protein of Torpedo electric organ, we have identified a single protein band in SDS-PAGE analysis of Xenopus myotomal muscle with an apparent molecular mass of 48 kD. With this antibody, the distribution of this protein was examined in the myotomal muscle fibers with immunofluorescence techniques. We found that the 48K protein is concentrated at the myotendinous junctions (MTJs) of these muscle fibers. The MTJ is also enriched in talin and vinculin. By double labeling muscle fibers with antibodies against talin and the 48K protein, these two proteins were found to colocalize at the membrane invaginations of the MTJ. In cultured myotomal muscle cells, the 48K protein and talin are also colocalized at sites of membrane-myofibril interaction. The 48K protein is, however, not found at focal adhesion sites in nonmuscle cells, which are enriched in talin. These data suggest that the 48K protein is specifically involved in the interaction of myofibrillar actin filaments with the plasma membrane at the MTJ. In addition to the MTJ localization, 48K protein is also present at AChR clusters both in vivo and in vitro. Thus, this protein is shared by both the MTJ and the neuromuscular junction.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrantes F. J., Neugebauer D. C., Zingsheim H. P. Peptide extraction by alkaline treatment is accompanied by rearrangement of the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata. FEBS Lett. 1980 Mar 24;112(1):73–78. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(80)80131-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloch R. J. Actin at receptor-rich domains of isolated acetylcholine receptor clusters. J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1447–1458. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloch R. J., Froehner S. C. The relationship of the postsynaptic 43K protein to acetylcholine receptors in receptor clusters isolated from cultured rat myotubes. J Cell Biol. 1987 Mar;104(3):645–654. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.3.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bloch R. J., Hall Z. W. Cytoskeletal components of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction: vinculin, alpha-actinin, and filamin. J Cell Biol. 1983 Jul;97(1):217–223. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.1.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bozyczko D., Decker C., Muschler J., Horwitz A. F. Integrin on developing and adult skeletal muscle. Exp Cell Res. 1989 Jul;183(1):72–91. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(89)90419-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burden S. J., DePalma R. L., Gottesman G. S. Crosslinking of proteins in acetylcholine receptor-rich membranes: association between the beta-subunit and the 43 kd subsynaptic protein. Cell. 1983 Dec;35(3 Pt 2):687–692. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burden S. J. The subsynaptic 43-kDa protein is concentrated at developing nerve-muscle synapses in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(23):8270–8273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.23.8270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burridge K., Connell L. A new protein of adhesion plaques and ruffling membranes. J Cell Biol. 1983 Aug;97(2):359–367. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.2.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Burridge K., Fath K., Kelly T., Nuckolls G., Turner C. Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:487–525. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cartaud J., Sobel A., Rousselet A., Devaux P. F., Changeux J. P. Consequences of alkaline treatment for the ultrastructure of the acetylcholine-receptor-rich membranes from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. J Cell Biol. 1981 Aug;90(2):418–426. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.2.418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Couteaux R., Pécot-Dechavassine Particularités structurales du sarcoplasme sous-neural. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1968 Jan 3;266(1):8–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cull-Candy S. G., Miledi R., Uchitel O. D. Properties of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine-receptor channels in organ cultured human muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1982 Dec;333:251–267. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fertuck H. C., Salpeter M. M. Quantitation of junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors by electron microscope autoradiography after 125I-alpha-bungarotoxin binding at mouse neuromuscular junctions. J Cell Biol. 1976 Apr;69(1):144–158. doi: 10.1083/jcb.69.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Froehner S. C., Murnane A. A., Tobler M., Peng H. B., Sealock R. A postsynaptic Mr 58,000 (58K) protein concentrated at acetylcholine receptor-rich sites in Torpedo electroplaques and skeletal muscle. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jun;104(6):1633–1646. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.6.1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Giloh H., Sedat J. W. Fluorescence microscopy: reduced photobleaching of rhodamine and fluorescein protein conjugates by n-propyl gallate. Science. 1982 Sep 24;217(4566):1252–1255. doi: 10.1126/science.7112126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KATZ B., MILEDI R. FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF ACTYLCHOLINE-REACTIVE SITES IN SKELETAL MUSCLE. J Physiol. 1964 Mar;170:379–388. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kordeli E., Cartaud J., Nghiêm H. O., Devillers-Thiéry A., Changeux J. P. Asynchronous assembly of the acetylcholine receptor and of the 43-kD nu1 protein in the postsynaptic membrane of developing Torpedo marmorata electrocyte. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jan;108(1):127–139. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.1.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kullberg R. W., Lentz T. L., Cohen M. W. Development of the myotomal neuromuscular junction in Xenopus laevis: an electrophysiological and fine-structural study. Dev Biol. 1977 Oct 1;60(1):101–129. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90113-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Luther P. W., Bloch R. J. Formaldehyde-amine fixatives for immunocytochemistry of cultured Xenopus myocytes. J Histochem Cytochem. 1989 Jan;37(1):75–82. doi: 10.1177/37.1.2491754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Massoulié J., Bon S. The molecular forms of cholinesterase and acetylcholinesterase in vertebrates. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1982;5:57–106. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.05.030182.000421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miledi R., Zelená J. Sensitivity to acetylcholine in rat slow muscle. Nature. 1966 May 21;210(5038):855–856. doi: 10.1038/210855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Musil L. S., Carr C., Cohen J. B., Merlie J. P. Acetylcholine receptor-associated 43K protein contains covalently bound myristate. J Cell Biol. 1988 Sep;107(3):1113–1121. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.3.1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peng H. B., Cheng P. C. Formation of postsynaptic specializations induced by latex beads in cultured muscle cells. J Neurosci. 1982 Dec;2(12):1760–1774. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.02-12-01760.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Peng H. B., Froehner S. C. Association of the postsynaptic 43K protein with newly formed acetylcholine receptor clusters in cultured muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1985 May;100(5):1698–1705. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.5.1698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Peng H. B., Nakajima Y. Membrane particle aggregates in innervated and noninnervated cultures of Xenopus embryonic muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jan;75(1):500–504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peng H. B., Wolosewick J. J., Cheng P. C. The development of myofibrils in cultured muscle cells: a whole-mount and thin-section electron microscopic study. Dev Biol. 1981 Nov;88(1):121–136. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(81)90224-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Porter S., Froehner S. C. Interaction of the 43K protein with components of Torpedo postsynaptic membranes. Biochemistry. 1985 Jan 15;24(2):425–432. doi: 10.1021/bi00323a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rochlin M. W., Chen Q. M., Tobler M., Turner C. E., Burridge K., Peng H. B. The relationship between talin and acetylcholine receptor clusters in Xenopus muscle cells. J Cell Sci. 1989 Mar;92(Pt 3):461–472. doi: 10.1242/jcs.92.3.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rochlin M. W., Peng H. B. Localization of intracellular proteins at acetylcholine receptor clusters induced by electric fields in Xenopus muscle cells. J Cell Sci. 1989 Sep;94(Pt 1):73–83. doi: 10.1242/jcs.94.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rousselet A., Cartaud J., Devaux P. F., Changeux J. P. The rotational diffusion of the acetylcholine receptor in Torpeda marmorata membrane fragments studied with a spin-labelled alpha-toxin: importance of the 43 000 protein(s). EMBO J. 1982;1(4):439–445. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01188.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sealock R., Paschal B., Beckerle M., Burridge K. Talin is a post-synaptic component of the rat neuromuscular junction. Exp Cell Res. 1986 Mar;163(1):143–150. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(86)90566-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sealock R., Wray B. E., Froehner S. C. Ultrastructural localization of the Mr 43,000 protein and the acetylcholine receptor in Torpedo postsynaptic membranes using monoclonal antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;98(6):2239–2244. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.6.2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Shear C. R., Bloch R. J. Vinculin in subsarcolemmal densities in chicken skeletal muscle: localization and relationship to intracellular and extracellular structures. J Cell Biol. 1985 Jul;101(1):240–256. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.1.240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tidball J. G., Daniel T. L. Myotendinous junctions of tonic muscle cells: structure and loading. Cell Tissue Res. 1986;245(2):315–322. doi: 10.1007/BF00213937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tidball J. G., O'Halloran T., Burridge K. Talin at myotendinous junctions. J Cell Biol. 1986 Oct;103(4):1465–1472. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.4.1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Trotter J. A., Corbett K., Avner B. P. Structure and function of the murine muscle-tendon junction. Anat Rec. 1981 Oct;201(2):293–302. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092010209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Trotter J. A., Eberhard S., Samora A. Structural connections of the muscle-tendon junction. Cell Motil. 1983;3(5-6):431–438. doi: 10.1002/cm.970030511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES