Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1990 Dec 1;111(6):2513–2526. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.6.2513

Mechanics of fibroblast locomotion: quantitative analysis of forces and motions at the leading lamellas of fibroblasts

PMCID: PMC2116409  PMID: 2277072

Abstract

Shapes, motions, and forces developed in lamellipodia and ruffles at the leading edges of primary chick embryo heart fibroblasts were characterized by differential interference contrast microscopy and digital video enhancement techniques. The initial extension of the cell edge to form a thin, planar lamellipodium parallel to the substrate surface was analyzed in two dimensions with temporal and spatial resolution of 3 s and 0.2 micron, respectively. An extension begins and ends with brief, rapid acceleration and deceleration separated by a long period of nearly constant velocity in the range of 4-7 microns/min. Extensions and retractions were initiated randomly over time. As demonstrated by optical sectioning microscopy, the extended lamellipodia formed ruffles by sharply bending upward at hinge points 2- 4 microns behind their tips. Surprisingly, ruffles continued to grow in length at the same average rate after bending upward. They maintained a straight shape in vertical cross section, suggesting the ruffles were mechanically stiff. The forces required to bend ruffles of these cells and of BC3H1 cells were measured by pushing a thin quartz fishpole probe against the tip of a ruffle 7-10 microns from its base either toward or away from the center of the cell. Force was determined by measuring the bending of the probe monitored by video microscopy. Typically the probe forced the ruffle to swing rigidly in an arc about an apparent hinge at is base, and ruffles rapidly, and almost completely, recovered their shape when the probe was removed. Hence, ruffles appeared to be relatively stiff and to resist bending with forces more elastic than viscous, unlike the cell body. Ruffles on both types of cells resisted bending with forces of 15-30 mudyn/microns of displacement at their tips when pushed toward or away from the cell center. The significance of the observations for mechanisms of cell locomotion is discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abercrombie M., Dunn G. A., Heath J. P. The shape and movement of fibroblasts in culture. Soc Gen Physiol Ser. 1977;32:57–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. 3. Movements of particles on the dorsal surface of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Oct;62(2):389–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90570-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Mar;59(3):393–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90646-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. II. "RRuffling". Exp Cell Res. 1970 Jun;60(3):437–444. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90537-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. IV. Electron microscopy of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res. 1971 Aug;67(2):359–367. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(71)90420-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Agard D. A. Optical sectioning microscopy: cellular architecture in three dimensions. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1984;13:191–219. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.13.060184.001203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Allen R. D., David G. B., Nomarski G. The zeiss-Nomarski differential interference equipment for transmitted-light microscopy. Z Wiss Mikrosk. 1969 Nov;69(4):193–221. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Argiro V., Bunge M. B., Johnson M. I. A quantitative study of growth cone filopodial extension. J Neurosci Res. 1985;13(1-2):149–162. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490130111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bray D., White J. G. Cortical flow in animal cells. Science. 1988 Feb 19;239(4842):883–888. doi: 10.1126/science.3277283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen W. T. Induction of spreading during fibroblast movement. J Cell Biol. 1979 Jun;81(3):684–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.81.3.684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen W. T. Mechanism of retraction of the trailing edge during fibroblast movement. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jul;90(1):187–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.1.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cortese J. D., Schwab B., 3rd, Frieden C., Elson E. L. Actin polymerization induces a shape change in actin-containing vesicles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(15):5773–5777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.15.5773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dembo M., Harris A. K. Motion of particles adhering to the leading lamella of crawling cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):528–536. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dipasquale A. Locomotory activity of epithelial cells in culture. Exp Cell Res. 1975 Aug;94(1):191–215. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(75)90545-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Evans E. A., Kwok R., McCown T. Calibration of beam deflection produced by cellular forces in the 10(-9)--10(-6) gram range. Cell Biophys. 1980 Jun;2(2):99–112. doi: 10.1007/BF02795837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Harris A. K., Wild P., Stopak D. Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. Science. 1980 Apr 11;208(4440):177–179. doi: 10.1126/science.6987736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Howard J., Hudspeth A. J. Mechanical relaxation of the hair bundle mediates adaptation in mechanoelectrical transduction by the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 May;84(9):3064–3068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.3064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hunter E. Biological techniques for avian sarcoma viruses. Methods Enzymol. 1979;58:379–393. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(79)58153-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Izzard C. S., Lochner L. R. Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. J Cell Sci. 1976 Jun;21(1):129–159. doi: 10.1242/jcs.21.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Izzard C. S., Lochner L. R. Formation of cell-to-substrate contacts during fibroblast motility: an interference-reflexion study. J Cell Sci. 1980 Apr;42:81–116. doi: 10.1242/jcs.42.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kishino A., Yanagida T. Force measurements by micromanipulation of a single actin filament by glass needles. Nature. 1988 Jul 7;334(6177):74–76. doi: 10.1038/334074a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kreis T. E., Geiger B., Schlessinger J. Mobility of microinjected rhodamine actin within living chicken gizzard cells determined by fluorescence photobleaching recovery. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):835–845. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90445-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kucik D. F., Elson E. L., Sheetz M. P. Forward transport of glycoproteins on leading lamellipodia in locomoting cells. Nature. 1989 Jul 27;340(6231):315–317. doi: 10.1038/340315a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kupfer A., Singer S. J. Molecular dynamics in the membranes of helper T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):8216–8220. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth. Neuron. 1988 Nov;1(9):761–772. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(88)90124-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mozzarelli A., Hofrichter J., Eaton W. A. Delay time of hemoglobin S polymerization prevents most cells from sickling in vivo. Science. 1987 Jul 31;237(4814):500–506. doi: 10.1126/science.3603036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Oliver J. M., Krawiec J. A., Becker E. L. The distribution of actin during chemotaxis in rabbit neutrophils. J Reticuloendothel Soc. 1978 Dec;24(6):697–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Oster G. F., Perelson A. S. The physics of cell motility. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1987;8:35–54. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1987.supplement_8.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Oster G. Biophysics of the leading lamella. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;10(1-2):164–171. doi: 10.1002/cm.970100121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Painter R. G., Whisenand J., McIntosh A. T. Effects of cytochalasin B on actin and myosin association with particle binding sites in mouse macrophages: implications with regard to the mechanism of action of the cytochalasins. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):373–384. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Petersen N. O., McConnaughey W. B., Elson E. L. Dependence of locally measured cellular deformability on position on the cell, temperature, and cytochalasin B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Sep;79(17):5327–5331. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.17.5327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rinnerthaler G., Geiger B., Small J. V. Contact formation during fibroblast locomotion: involvement of membrane ruffles and microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1988 Mar;106(3):747–760. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.3.747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schubert D., Harris A. J., Devine C. E., Heinemann S. Characterization of a unique muscle cell line. J Cell Biol. 1974 May;61(2):398–413. doi: 10.1083/jcb.61.2.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sheetz M. P., Turney S., Qian H., Elson E. L. Nanometre-level analysis demonstrates that lipid flow does not drive membrane glycoprotein movements. Nature. 1989 Jul 27;340(6231):284–288. doi: 10.1038/340284a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Small J. V. Organisations of actin and fibroblast locomotion. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;85(Pt B):341–358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Smith S. J. Neuronal cytomechanics: the actin-based motility of growth cones. Science. 1988 Nov 4;242(4879):708–715. doi: 10.1126/science.3055292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Taylor D. L., Wang Y. L., Heiple J. M. Contractile basis of ameboid movement. VII. The distribution of fluorescently labeled actin in living amebas. J Cell Biol. 1980 Aug;86(2):590–598. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.2.590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tilney L. G., Inoué S. Acrosomal reaction of Thyone sperm. II. The kinetics and possible mechanism of acrosomal process elongation. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jun;93(3):820–827. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.3.820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tilney L. G., Inoué S. Acrosomal reaction of the Thyone sperm. III. The relationship between actin assembly and water influx during the extension of the acrosomal process. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1273–1283. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang Y. L. Exchange of actin subunits at the leading edge of living fibroblasts: possible role of treadmilling. J Cell Biol. 1985 Aug;101(2):597–602. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.2.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES