Abstract
Background
Flexion myelopathy is one of the suggested mechanism for Hirayama disease (HD) but simultaneous radiological and neurophysiological evaluation is lacking. This study therefore evaluates the effect of neck flexion in HD using somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), F waves, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Method
Eight HD patients and seven matched controls were subjected to median and ulnar F wave (minimal latency, FM ratio, persistence, and chronodispersion), and SEPs evaluating N9, N13, and N20 potentials in neutral and neck flexion. Spinal MRI was carried out in neutral and neck flexion and evaluated for cord atrophy, signal changes, cord compression, posterior epidural tissue, and loss of dural attachment.
Results
The patients were aged 19 to 30 years. Minimal F latency, FM ratio, persistence, and chronodispersion in neutral and neck flexion did not show any change nor was there any change in N13 latency and amplitude on median and ulnar SEPs. The difference in these parameters in neutral and neck flexion were also not significant in HD compared with controls. The change in N13 was also not related to loss of dural attachment and posterior epidural tissue.
Conclusion
Neck flexion does not produce significant changes in N13 and F wave parameters and is not related to dynamic MRI changes. The other mechanisms for HD should therefore be explored.
Keywords: F wave, Hirayama disease, magnetic resonance imaging, somatosensory evoked potential, neck flexion
Hirayama disease (HD) is a non‐compressive juvenile spinal muscle atrophy characterised by insidious onset of unilateral or asymmetric oblique amyotrophy affecting C7‐T1 myotomes. It is mainly reported from Japan, India, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Singapore and also from Denmark, Holland, France, USA, and Italy.1,2,3,4 The aetiology of HD is not well understood but various possibilities have been suggested such as ischaemia of spinal cord as a result of neck flexion,5 autoimmune, atopy,6 and genetic factors.7,8 SMN gene deletions however were not found.7,9 Significant amplitude reduction of N13 cervical somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) on neck flexion has been attributed to cord compression or microvascular changes during neck flexion.10 Spinal MRI in cervical flexion showed forward displacement of dural sac and compressive flattening of lower cervical cord. Cinematographic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed signal void in posterior epidural space pulsating synchronously with cardiac beat suggesting passive dilatation of epidural venous plexus.5 These authors, however, did not evaluate corresponding neurophysiological changes and Restuccia et al did not evaluate MRI changes.
F waves are sensitive to postural change. Increased F wave chronodispersion has been reported in patients with lumbar canal stenosis on standing compared with resting state.11 Comprehensive evaluation of F wave and SEPs with corresponding MRI findings in neutral and neck flexion may provide valuable information regarding the possible mechanism of HD. In this paper we report upper limb SEP and F wave changes in HD during neutral and neck flexion and correlate these with MRI findings.
Methods
The diagnosis of HD was based on predefined criteria.1 All the patients had detailed clinical and neurological evaluation. The distributions of muscle wasting were noted. Muscle power was assessed on a 0‐V MRC scale and biceps, triceps, knee, and ankle reflexes were tested. Pinprick and joint position sensations were noted. Evidence of Horner's syndrome, hyperhydrosis, and postural hypotension were recorded.
Cervical spinal MRI was carried out in neutral and fully flexed neck position as described earlier5 on a I.5T Signa GE medical system. T1, T2, and PD sequences were obtained in sagittal and axial sections. The MRI was evaluated for lordosis, cord atrophy, abnormal cord intensity, posterior epidural tissue during flexion, cord compression, and loss of posterior dural attachment.
Somatosensory evoked potential
Right median and ulnar SEPs were obtained by stimulating the nerves at the wrist giving a 0.1 ms square wave pulse at 1 Hz to elicit a painless twitch. Recording surface electrodes were applied at Erb's point, C7 spinous process, and contralateral parietal cortex referred to Fz. Ground electrode was placed between stimulating and recording electrodes. A total of 200 epochs were twice averaged at 1 μv/div, sweep time 100 ms, filter setting 20–2000 Hz. The latency and amplitude of N9, N13, and N20 were recorded.
F wave
F waves were recorded from abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and abductor pollicis brevis (APB) by stimulating ulnar and median nerves respectively. Surface recording electrodes were used in a belly tendon montage keeping the resistance below 5 kΩ. Twenty supramaximal stimuli were delivered at 0.5 Hz. The gain was 0.1–0.2 mV, filter setting 10–10 000 Hz, and sweep time 50 ms. F waves were analysed for minimal latency, FM ratio (amplitude as percentage of M wave), persistence, and chronodispersion. These were repeated during sustained neck flexion. During the studies, laboratory temperature was 22–25°C. All the patients consented for the study. SEP and F wave parameters were compared with normal controls, who were obtained from age (17–30 years) and sex matched healthy volunteers using same protocol.
Results
There were eight patients with HD, aged 19 to 30 years, all men, four students, four sedentary workers. The duration of illness ranged between one and five years and the symptoms were stationary for 6 to 24 months. The age of disease onset was 16–25 years. Muscle wasting was bilateral in six and unilateral in two patients. Cold paresis and polyminimyoclonus were present in all. None had Horner's syndrome or sensory loss. Biceps, knee, and ankle reflexes were normal but triceps was diminished.
Neurophysiological studies
Median motor nerve conductions were unrecordable in three and ulnar in two patients. The ulnar CMAP (compound muscle action potential) was reduced in two but nerve conduction velocity was normal. Median and ulnar sensory conductions were normal in all. Electromyography showed fibrillations and fasciculations and neurogenic motor unit potentials in C7‐T1 myotomes.
F wave
Median F was unrecordable in three and ulnar in two patients. In neutral position the minimal median F latency in HD patients was 30.60 (SD 0.81) ms, FM ratio 10.32 (SD 7.95), persistence 7.20 (SD 6.30), and chronodispersion 2.01 (SD 3.14) ms. These parameters in ulnar F study were minimal F latency 30.62 (SD 1.10) ms, FM ratio 13.25 (SD 12.34), persistence 9.67 (SD 6.50), and chronodispersion 2.42 (SD 1.85) ms. On neck flexion these parameters did not significantly change compared with that in neutral position in both the patients and controls (table 1).
Table 1 F wave and spinal (N13) somatosensory evoked potential parameters in Hirayama disease and controls in neutral and neck flexion.
| Hirayama disease | Control | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutral | Flexion | p Value | Neutral | Flexion | p Value | |
| Median F | ||||||
| Latency (ms) | 30.60 (0.81) | 29.81 (1.90) | 0.24 | 27.74 (2.22) | 28.11 (2.03) | 0.13 |
| FM ratio | 10.32 (7.95) | 9.09 (7.81) | 0.51 | 4.57 (1.72) | 5.00 (2.00) | 0.45 |
| Persistence | 7.20 (6.30) | 9.00 (6.52) | 0.14 | 13.71 (2.21) | 13.14 (3.34) | 0.65 |
| Chronodispersion (ms) | 2.01 (3.14) | 2.08 (1.55) | 0.95 | 2.31 (0.81) | 2.24 (1.57) | 0.91 |
| Ulnar F | ||||||
| Latency (ms) | 30.62 (1.10) | 29.80 (1.10) | 0.16 | 27.81 (1.95) | 28.21(2.02) | 0.29 |
| FM ratio | 13.25 (12.34) | 8.63 (9.19) | 0.55 | 3.84 (2.08) | 2.41 (0.90) | 0.14 |
| Persistence | 9.67 (6.50) | 11.33 (4.32) | 0.29 | 14.86 (3.67) | 15.57 (2.88) | 0.55 |
| Chronodispersion (ms) | 2.42 (1.85) | 4.38 (3.74) | 0.08 | 2.24 (1.14) | 1.86 (0.80) | 0.18 |
| Somatosensory evoked potential | ||||||
| Median N13 | ||||||
| Latency (ms) | 13.56 (0.79) | 13.47 (0.86) | 0.73 | 13.41 (1.06) | 13.74 (1.04) | 0.13 |
| Amplitude (μv) | 1.86 (0.88) | 1.99 (1.01) | 0.77 | 2.66 (0.55) | 2.61 (0.86) | 0.93 |
| Ulnar N13 | ||||||
| Latency (ms) | 14.26 (0.71) | 13.81 (0.83) | 0.27 | 14.41 (1.02) | 14.61 (1.29) | 0.58 |
| Amplitude (μv) | 1.62 (0.54) | 1.69 (1.08) | 0.86 | 1.91 (0.63) | 1.62 (0.48) | 0.36 |
Data shown as mean (SD).
Somatosensory evoked potential
Median and ulnar SEPs were recordable in all the patients. The mean (SD) of median N9, N13, and N20 latency and amplitudes were normal. There was no difference in the latency and amplitude of N13 in neutral and neck flexion both in HD and controls (table 1, fig 1). In HD patients the mean difference between neutral and neck flexion of median N13 latency was 0.97 (0.70) (control −0.33 (0.49)) ms (p = 0.19), amplitude −0.05 (1.32) (0.01 (1.15)) μv (p = 0.93), and that of ulnar N13 latency 0.46 (1.03) (−0.19 (0.90)) ms (p = 0.22) and amplitude −0.01 (0.94) (0.31 (0.75)) μv (p = 0.47).
Figure 1 Median somatosensory evoked potential of a patient with Hirayama disease showing no change in latency and amplitude of N13 potential recorded in neutral (A) and neck flexion (B) position. (C). Spin echo T1 cervical MRI, sagittal section of the same patient in neck flexion showing cord atrophy and posterior epidural tissue (arrow).
Cervical spine MRI
Cervical spine MRI in seven patients showed loss of cervical lordosis in one, cord atrophy in six, and posterior epidural tissue during neck flexion in five patients (fig 1C). Loss of dural attachment was 33% in four, 66% in one, and complete in one patient. One patient did not have loss of posterior dural attachment in flexion. N13 latency (median r = 0.08, ulnar r = −0.16) and amplitude (median r = −0.69, ulnar r = 0.73) of ulnar and median SEP were not related to extent of loss of posterior dural attachment during neck flexion.
Discussion
Our study shows that there was no significant change in SEP and F wave parameters on neck flexion compared with neutral position. F waves are used to evaluate the proximal nerve conduction and anterior horn cell disorders. Because of chronic denervation there may be prolongation of latency, reduction in amplitude; however depending on reinnervation, the amplitudes may increase. Persistence of F also may decline. In patients with severe wasting, the F wave may become unrecordable. In our study F wave was unrecordable in three patients. On neck flexion, F wave latency, FM ratio, persistence, and chronodispersion did not significantly change. F wave has been reported to be sensitive to change in posture. In a study on lumbar canal stenosis, F waves showed significant changes on standing compared with supine.11
SEP changes in HD have reported reduction of N13 amplitude, which was not found in our study. The SEP amplitudes are quite variable and should decline by 50% to achieve significance.12 During ischaemia N20 potential has become unrecordable if regional cerebral blood falls below 12–15 ml/100 g/min. A study of ischaemic myelopathy after surgery for coarctation of aorta showed normal tibial SEPs in both the patients.13 Moreover, the SEP abnormalities are expected when there is severe spinal cord ischaemia involving the posterior one third of spinal cord, which is generally supplied by two posterior spinal arteries with good collaterals. During ischaemic myelopathy, corticospinal pathways being located in the border zone are vulnerable. This would be associated lower limb pyramidal sign especially in the presence of severe anterior horn cell involvement of C8‐T1 region as this falls in watershed zone. Postulation of flexion myelopathy if correct, the neck flexion should be associated with symptoms, which should regress in neutral position as was found in lumbar canal stenosis. The earlier SEP study however reported N13 amplitude reduction but did not evaluate the corresponding MRI findings.
In our study the MRI showed cord atrophy without cord compression during neck flexion. Presence of posterior epidural tissue or loss of dural attachment during neck flexion reflects the segmental spinal cord atrophy of C7‐T1 region rather than its cause. None of these patients had lower limb hyperreflexia. In our earlier study lower limb hyperreflexia have been reported in two of seven HD patients.3 Detailed investigations of lower limb hyperreflexia using HM ratio, vibratory, and reciprocal inhibition were not significantly changed suggesting lack of significant corticospinal dysfunction in HD.3 The natural history of HD is quite characteristic. In young adults, near pubertal age there is slowly progressive weakness and wasting with cold paresis in C7‐T1 myotomes, which stabilises after a few years. No progression of HD has been reported; therefore spinal flexion mechanism does not explain the natural history. While conducting a SEP study in neutral and neck flexion the minimal shift of recording electrodes, associated change in skin resistance and movement of spinal cord generator may influence the results especially the amplitude. These variables have been excluded by following the same protocol in HD and controls.
Occurrence of HD in young men and reports in two families by us3,7 and identical twins by others8 suggest a possibility of a hereditary disease and highlight the need for further study.
Acknowledgements
We thank Rakesh Kumar Nigam for technical help.
Abbreviations
MRI - magnetic resonance imaging
HD - Hirayama disease
SEP - somatosensory potential
Footnotes
Funding: none
Competing interests: none declared
References
- 1.Hirayama K. Non‐progressive juvenile spinal muscular atrophy of the distal upper limb (Hirayama's disease). In: De Jong JMBV, ed. Hand book of clinical neurology. Vol.15. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1991107–120.
- 2.Sobue I, Saito N, Lida M.et al Juvenile type of distal and segmental muscular atrophy of upper extremities. Ann Neurol 19783429–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Misra U K, Kalita J. Central motor conduction in Hirayama disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 19959773–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gourie‐ Devi M, Nalini A. Long term follow up of 44 patients with brachial monomelic amyotrophy. Acta Neurol Scand 2003107215–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hirayama K, Tokumar Y. Cervical dural sac and spinal cord in juvenile muscular atrophy of distal upper extremity. Neurology 2000541922–1926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kira J, Ochi H. Juvenile muscular atrophy of the distal upper limb (Hirayama disease) associated with atopy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 200170798–801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Misra U K, Kalita J, Misra V N.et al A clinical, MRI and SMN gene deletion study in Hirayama disease. Arch Neurol 200562120–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tandan R, Sharma K R, Bradley W G.et al Chronic segmental spinal muscular atrophy of upper extremities in identical twins. Neurology 199040236–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Guglilelmo G D, Brahe C, Di Muzio A.et al Benign monomelic amyotrophies of upper and lower limb are not associated to deletions of survival motor neuron gene. J Neurol Sci 1996141111–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Restuccia D, Rubino M, Valeriani M.et al Cervical cord dysfunction during neck flexion in Hirayama's disease. Neurology 2003601980–1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tang L M, Schwartz M S, Swash M. Postural effects on F wave parameters in lumbosacral root compression and canal stenosis. Brain 1988Ill207–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Desmedt J E. Somatosensory evoked potentials. In: Picton TW, ed. A handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Vol 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988245
- 13.Kalita J, Srivastava A K, Mittal P.et al Evoked potential changes in ischaemic myelopathy. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 200343211–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

