Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2006 Apr 20;77(7):880–882. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073395

Dura mater‐associated Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: experience from surveillance in the UK

C A Heath 1,2,3,4,5,6, R A Barker 1,2,3,4,5,6, T F G Esmonde 1,2,3,4,5,6, P Harvey 1,2,3,4,5,6, R Roberts 1,2,3,4,5,6, P Trend 1,2,3,4,5,6, M W Head 1,2,3,4,5,6, C Smith 1,2,3,4,5,6, J E Bell 1,2,3,4,5,6, J W Ironside 1,2,3,4,5,6, R G Will 1,2,3,4,5,6, R S G Knight 1,2,3,4,5,6
PMCID: PMC2117491  PMID: 16627534

Abstract

Between 1970 and 2003, seven cases of human dura mater‐associated Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) were identified in the UK. Furthermore, we identified a case of CJD in a porcine dura graft recipient. The mean incubation period of the human dura mater cases was 93 (range 45–177) months. The clinico‐pathological features of the cases are described and compared with cases previously reported in the world literature.


Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD) exists in four clinical forms: sporadic, genetic, iatrogenic and variant. The cause of sporadic CJD, the most common form worldwide, is unknown and case–control studies have failed to identify any consistent risk factor, although two studies have implicated previous surgical interventions.1,2 Genetic forms of the disease are associated with underlying mutations of the prion protein gene (PRNP), which are generally considered to be directly causative. Mutations, however, possibly increase liability to some, as of yet unrecognised, source of infection. The two remaining forms of CJD are acquired. Variant CJD is considered to be caused by bovine spongiform encephalopathy through contaminated food products3,4,5; iatrogenic CJD results from the inadvertent transmission of CJD during the course of medical or surgical treatment. The two most numerically significant instances of iatrogenic CJD resulted from treatment with cadaveric human growth hormone and the use of dura mater grafts in surgery. Corneal grafts, depth electrodes and neurosurgical instruments have also rarely been implicated.6,7

The first report of dura mater‐associated CJD was published in 1987,8 with a more detailed report appearing the following year;9 to date, 164 cases have been recognised worldwide (P Brown, personal communication, 2006). This paper reports and describes the seven cases of human dura mater graft‐associated CJD identified during surveillance in the UK and, for the first time, reports a case of CJD in a porcine dura graft recipient.

Methods

CJD surveillance in the UK has been undertaken in four phases.

  • A retrospective review in England and Wales from 1970 to 1979.

  • A prospective study in England and Wales from 1980 to 1984.

  • A retrospective review in the UK to cover the period from 1985 to 1990.

  • A prospective surveillance was instituted in the UK in 1990 and continues.

The methodology of the National CJD Surveillance Unit has been described in previous publications.10,11

Results

Human dura mater

During the period 1970 and 2003, seven cases of human dura mater‐associated CJD were identified in the UK (table 1). The latent period between surgery and the onset of CJD ranged from 45 to 177 months* (mean 93). The mean age at surgery was 33 years, with a mean age at onset of 41 years.

Table 1 UK case details—human dura mater.

Case Surgical procedure Dura Year of surgery Year of death Incubation period (Months) Duration of illness (Months)
I, Esmonde et al12 Suboccipital craniotomy and C1/2 laminectomy for cerebellar ectopia and syringomyelia ? 1969 1979 104* 6
II, Esmonde et al12 Excision of a left temporal cortex meningioma L 1983 1991 93* 5*
III Repair surgical leak after acoustic neuroma excision L 1985 1989 51 2
IV, Willison et al13 Posterior fossa decompression and cervical laminectomy for cerebellar ectopia or syringomyelia L 1985 1989 45* 4
V Excision of a left parietal cortex meningioma 1:L 1985 1993 1:86 11
2:L 1986 2:79
VI Excision of a cerebellar astrocytoma L 1986 1997 103 33
VII Excision of an eosinophilic granuloma right frontal region skull L 1987 2003 177 5
Porcine dura graft:
VIII Excision of a right frontoparietal meningioma P 1988 2000 134 3

*Revised from previously published figures.

L, Lyodura; P, Porcine dura.

Lyodura (B Braun Melsungen, Germany), a particular brand of human dura mater, was implicated in six of the seven cases (the manufacturer of the dura graft implicated in case I is unknown).

The six cases associated with Lyodura were exposed to the presumed source of “infection” between 1983 and 1987, with the first recognised case in the UK exposed to human dura mater in 1969.

A detailed account of both clinical and investigative features is available at http://jnnp.bmjjournals.com/supplemental. In four cases, the clinical phenotype at onset appears to correlate with the site of graft placement or underlying parenchymal damage (cases II, III, V and VI). For example—in case II, the presenting clinical features included a right visual field defect in an individual with a tumour localised to the left hemisphere. The subsequent CJD began with a right visual field disturbance and progressed with signs indicating the involvement of the left hemisphere. Some of the cases were investigated before the widespread availability of MRI; therefore MRI was available in only four of the seven cases. None of the cases showed the characteristic radiological features of human prion disease14 with post‐surgical change being the most commonly recognised abnormality. Despite all seven cases having at least one electroencephalogram during the course of investigation, only three of the seven cases showed the “typical” features.

Autopsy was carried out in five of the seven cases. In general, the neuropathology was characterised by widespread spongiform change accompanied by variable neuronal loss and gliosis. Western blot analysis for PrPres was carried out in three cases (II, VI and VII). The mobility and glycoform ratio of the PrPres is indistinguishable from those of type 1 PrPres identified in cases of sporadic CJD, and is distinct from type 2B PrPres identified in variant CJD.

Porcine dura mater

We believe the identification of CJD in a porcine graft recipient to be the first such report worldwide (table 1, case VIII). The recipient underwent excision of a right fronto‐parietal meningioma in 1988 and a zenoderm graft was used to repair the dura. The recipient presented with headaches, ataxia and cognitive decline 134 months later. Investigative features, including an electroencephalogram, were supportive of the clinical diagnosis, and pathological confirmation was obtained. Autopsy showed spongiform change in the frontal and temporal cortex, with similar features identified in the basal ganglia, thalamus and cerebellum. Immunocytochemistry for PrP showed widespread accumulation and western blot analysis showed the type 1 isoform.

Discussion

Human dura mater is a rare, but important source of transmission of human prion disease, with only seven cases recognised in a 33‐year period. Surveillance systems worldwide have identified 164 cases of CJD in people previously exposed to human dura mater. Prevalence is particularly high in Japan and probably reflects neurosurgical practice, with an estimated 20 000 grafts used each year.15 The overall risk of CJD associated with human dura grafts in the UK is unknown because an accurate estimation of human dura graft use and thus a denominator for calculation of risk is not available. The estimated risk after exposure in Japan has been estimated to be approximately 1 per 2000 patients treated between 1979 and 2000 and approximately 1 per 1000 between 1983 and 1987.16 Neurosurgical practice in Japan, with widespread use of dura mater, may be different from other countries throughout the industrialised world and therefore it is unreasonable to extrapolate any estimated risk from these data. If neurosurgical practices in the UK were more akin to those in Australia, then a subsequent study by Brooke and co‐workers would help provide additional information pertaining to estimated risk. By using information from the Australian CJD Surveillance system, Brooke and co‐workers estimated the risk associated with exposure to human dura mater to be approximately 1 per 500 patients treated between 1978 and 2003.17 Clearly, the risk of developing CJD in this patient population is considerably higher than we would expect by chance.

The human dura mater implicated in the transmission of CJD was processed, almost exclusively, by B Braun Melsungen in Germany and traded under the name Lyodura. Over 100 Japanese cases, and all but one of the UK cases (the source of the first case identified in the UK is unknown), have been associated with this particular product and only rarely has dura processed by other manufacturers been associated with transmission.18,19 Although the first case in the UK was exposed to potentially infectious dura in 1969, a disproportionately large number of cases were exposed between 1983 and 1987 (80% of those identified worldwide and six of the seven cases in the UK). Interestingly, the apparent reduction in the number of cases post‐1987 coincided with the introduction of stringent donor selection criteria and the introduction of sodium hydroxide immersion techniques in the manufacturing process.

We found no temporal or geographical association between any of the dura‐associated cases, or any other case of CJD identified in the UK, despite potential contamination of neurosurgical instruments.

It has been proposed that clinical features at onset are dependent on the site of graft placement or underlying parenchymal damage20,21,22 and our findings may support such a proposition. The explanation for this observation is unclear. We, could, speculate that the pathological process starts within a region adjacent to the graft and that this is reflected in the early clinical features. This proposition may also be supported by findings obtained at autopsy, with severe pathological changes identified adjacent to graft placement in three cases. Overall, the pathology is consistent for that previously described in dura mater‐associated CJD.9,18 We did not identify either “kuru‐type” or florid PrP plaques. The florid PrP plaques were previously noted in limited distribution in a small number of dural graft‐associated iatrogenic CJD cases in Japan.21,23,24

We believe case VIII represents the first reported case of CJD in a person previously exposed to a graft from a non‐human source. The age at onset, duration of illness, clinical and investigative features were similar to a typical case of sporadic CJD. Furthermore, the pathological features were also considered characteristic of sporadic CJD, with type 1 PrPres identified. Neither finding can definitively exclude the possibility of transmission of a yet unidentified pathogen. As natural transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are, however, as yet unrecognised in pigs, despite experimental transmission in animal models,25 a chance association seems the most plausible explanation.

Additional data on the cases in this report are available at http://jnnp.bmjjournals.com/supplemental

Copyright © 2006 BMJ Publishing Group

Supplementary Material

[web only appendix]

Acknowledgements

We thank Jan MacKenzie for all her help in producing this manuscript. We also thank our colleagues within the European surveillance programme for updated information, particularly Pascual Sanchez Jaun, and neurological colleagues throughout the UK, particularly Dr Graham Lennox, for assistance with this manuscript. Finally, we thank our colleagues at the NCJDSU, particularly Alison Green, for carrying out CSF analysis, David Summers for advice on neuroimaging, and also Hester Ward and Katy Murray for comments on the manuscript.

Footnotes

*Case V received two dura grafts, it is assumed that the first graft was responsible for transmission.

Competing interests: None.

Additional data on the cases in this report are available at http://jnnp.bmjjournals.com/supplemental

References

  • 1.Collins S, Law M G, Fletcher A.et al Surgical treatment and risk of sporadic Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease: a case‐control study. Lancet 1999353693–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ward H J T, Everington D, Croes E A.et al Sporadic Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease and surgery: a case‐control study using community controls. Neurology 200259543–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Will R G, Ironside J W, Zeidler M.et al A new variant of Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease in the UK. Lancet 1996347921–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Collinge J, Sidle K C L, Meads J.et al Molecular analysis of prion strain variation and the aetiology of ‘new variant' CJD. Nature 1996383685–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bruce M E, Will R G, Ironside J W.et al Transmissions to mice indicate that ‘new variant' CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature 1997389498–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duffy P, Wolf J, Collins G.et al Possible person‐to‐person transmission of Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease. N Engl J Med 1974290692–693. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Foncin J F, Gaches J, Cathala F.et al Transmission iatrogene interhumaine possible de maladie de Creutzfeldt‐Jakob avec atteinte des grains de cervelet. Rev Neurol 1980136280 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prichard J W, Thadani V, Kalb R.et al Rapidly progressive dementia in a patient who received a cadaveric dura mater graft. Morb Mortal Wkly Report 19873449–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thadani V, Penar P L, Partington J.et al Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease probably acquired from a cadaveric dura mater graft. J Neurosurg 198869766–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Will R G. A new variant of Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease in the UK. Proceedings of the Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine 19979–11 April 1997, University College, Chester, UK.
  • 11.Will R G, Zeidler M, Stewart G E.et al Diagnosis of new variant Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease. Ann Neurol 200047575–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Esmonde T, Leuck C J S, Duchen L W.et al CJD and lyophilised dura mater garfts: a report of two cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 199156999–1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Willison H J, Gale A N, McLaughlin J E. Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease following cadaveric dura mater graft. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 199154940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Collie D A, Sellar R J, Zeidler M.et al MRI of Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease: imaging features and recommended MRI protocol. Clin Radiol 200156726–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tateishi J. CJD transmitted through cadaveric dura grafts. J Clin Exp Med 1997992–993.
  • 16.Nakamura Y, Watanabe M, Nagoshi K. CJD associated with cadaveric dura mater grafts‐Japan 1979–2003. Morb Mortal Wkly Report 2005521179–1181. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brooke F J, Boyd A, Klug G M.et al Lyodura use and the risk of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease in Australia. Med J Aus 20041801–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pocchiari M, Masullo C, Salvatore M.et al Creutfeldt‐Jakob disease after non‐commercial dura mater graft. Lancet 1992340614–615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hannah E L, Belay E D, Gambetti P.et al Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease after receipt of a previously unimplicated brand of dura mater graft. Neurology 2001561080–1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sato T. CJD with dura mater transplantation. Clin Neurol 200343870–872. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fushimi M, Sato K, Shimizu T.et al PLEDS in Creutzfeldt Jakob disease following a cadaveric dura graft. Clin Neurophysiol 20021131030–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nishida y, Yamane M, Hara k.et al Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease after Jannetta's operation with cadaveric dura mater. J Neurol 2002249480–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Takashima S, Tateishi J, Taguchi Y.et al Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease with florid plaques after cadaveric dural graft in a Japanese woman. Lancet 1997350865–866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kimura K, Nonaka A, Tashiro H.et al Atypical form of dural graft associated Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease: report of a postmortem case with review of the literature. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 200170696–699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Castilla J, Gutierrez‐Adan A, Brun A.et al Subclinical BSE infection in transgenic mice expressing porcine prion protein. J Neurosci 2004245063–5069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[web only appendix]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES