Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1992 Jun 1;175(6):1521–1529. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.6.1521

Rejection of skin allografts by indirect allorecognition of donor class I major histocompatibility complex peptides

PMCID: PMC2119238  PMID: 1588278

Abstract

LEW (RT1l) rats were immunized with peptides corresponding to the alpha helical region of the alpha 1 domain (peptide 1), the beta sheet of the alpha 2 domain (peptide 2), and the alpha helical region of the alpha 2 domain (peptide 3) of the RT1-Aav1 classical class I molecule of the DA (RT1av1) strain. The immunizations were without carriers, and the objective was to prime to indirect allorecognition without influencing direct recognition of the RT1-Aav1 molecule. The LEW rats mounted strong primary and secondary antibody responses to peptides 1 and 3, but only weak secondary responses to peptide 2. None of the antipeptide antibodies crossreacted with intact RT1-Aav1 class I molecules. The immunization also resulted in LEW antigen-presenting cell-dependent, CD4+ T cell proliferative responses, which were very strong against peptide 1 and weakest against peptide 2. LEW rats immunized with peptides 1 or 3, but most effectively with both peptides 1 and 3 together, showed accelerated rejection of DA skin allografts. This effect was not observed in LEW rats immunized with peptide 2. In response to the DA skin allograft, the peptide-immunized LEW rats showed markedly accelerated kinetics of antibody production to the intact RT1-Aav1 molecule. These data demonstrate that indirect allorecognition can play an important role in allograft rejection and have important implications for understanding allograft rejection and its regulation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (837.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bjorkman P. J., Saper M. A., Samraoui B., Bennett W. S., Strominger J. L., Wiley D. C. Structure of the human class I histocompatibility antigen, HLA-A2. Nature. 1987 Oct 8;329(6139):506–512. doi: 10.1038/329506a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyle W. An extension of the 51Cr-release assay for the estimation of mouse cytotoxins. Transplantation. 1968 Sep;6(6):761–764. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196809000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brideau R. J., Carter P. B., McMaster W. R., Mason D. W., Williams A. F. Two subsets of rat T lymphocytes defined with monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Immunol. 1980 Aug;10(8):609–615. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830100807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Butcher G. W., Howard J. C. Genetic control of transplant rejection. Transplantation. 1982 Oct;34(4):161–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chao N. J., Timmerman L., McDevitt H. O., Jacob C. O. Molecular characterization of MHC class II antigens (beta 1 domain) in the BB diabetes-prone and -resistant rat. Immunogenetics. 1989;29(4):231–234. doi: 10.1007/BF00717906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Daar A. S., Fuggle S. V., Fabre J. W., Ting A., Morris P. J. The detailed distribution of MHC Class II antigens in normal human organs. Transplantation. 1984 Sep;38(3):293–298. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198409000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dalchau R., Fabre J. W. Identification and unusual tissue distribution of the canine and human homologues of Thy-1 (theta). J Exp Med. 1979 Mar 1;149(3):576–591. doi: 10.1084/jem.149.3.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dalchau R., Fangmann J., Fabre J. W. Allorecognition of isolated, denatured chains of class I and class II major histocompatibility complex molecules. Evidence for an important role for indirect allorecognition in transplantation. Eur J Immunol. 1992 Mar;22(3):669–677. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eckels D. D., Gorski J., Rothbard J., Lamb J. R. Peptide-mediated modulation of T-cell allorecognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):8191–8195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.8191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fabre J. W., Morris P. J. Passive enhancement of homozygous renal allografts in the rat. Transplantation. 1974 Nov;18(5):429–435. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197411000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fabre J. W. Rat kidney allograft model: was it all too good to be true? Transplantation. 1982 Oct;34(4):223–225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. French M. E., Batchelor J. R. Enhancement of renal allografts in rats and man. Transplant Rev. 1972;13:115–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1972.tb00062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gracie J. A., Bolton E. M., Porteous C., Bradley J. A. T cell requirements for the rejection of renal allografts bearing an isolated class I MHC disparity. J Exp Med. 1990 Dec 1;172(6):1547–1557. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.6.1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Halttunen J. Failure of rat kidney nephron components to induce allogeneic lymphocytes to proliferate in mixed lymphocyte kidney cell culture. Transplantation. 1990 Sep;50(3):481–487. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199009000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hart D. N., Fabre J. W. Demonstration and characterization of Ia-positive dendritic cells in the interstitial connective tissues of rat heart and other tissues, but not brain. J Exp Med. 1981 Aug 1;154(2):347–361. doi: 10.1084/jem.154.2.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hart D. N., Fabre J. W. Quantitative studies on the tissue distribution of Ia and SD antigens in the DA and Lewis rat strains. Transplantation. 1979 Feb;27(2):110–119. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197902000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Howard J. C., Butcher G. W. The mechanism of graft rejection and the concept of antigenic strength. Scand J Immunol. 1981 Dec;14(6):687–691. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1981.tb00611.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huitinga I., van Rooijen N., de Groot C. J., Uitdehaag B. M., Dijkstra C. D. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in Lewis rats after elimination of macrophages. J Exp Med. 1990 Oct 1;172(4):1025–1033. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.4.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hunt S. V., Fowler M. H. A repopulation assay for B and T lymphocyte stem cells employing radiation chimaeras. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1981 Jul;14(4):445–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1981.tb00551.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jefferies W. A., Green J. R., Williams A. F. Authentic T helper CD4 (W3/25) antigen on rat peritoneal macrophages. J Exp Med. 1985 Jul 1;162(1):117–127. doi: 10.1084/jem.162.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lechler R. I., Lombardi G., Batchelor J. R., Reinsmoen N., Bach F. H. The molecular basis of alloreactivity. Immunol Today. 1990 Mar;11(3):83–88. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(90)90033-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Marrack P., Lo D., Brinster R., Palmiter R., Burkly L., Flavell R. H., Kappler J. The effect of thymus environment on T cell development and tolerance. Cell. 1988 May 20;53(4):627–634. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90578-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Matzinger P., Bevan M. J. Hypothesis: why do so many lymphocytes respond to major histocompatibility antigens? Cell Immunol. 1977 Mar 1;29(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(77)90269-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Milton A. D., Spencer S. C., Fabre J. W. The effects of cyclosporine on the induction of donor class I and class II MHC antigens in heart and kidney allografts in the rat. Transplantation. 1986 Oct;42(4):337–347. doi: 10.1097/00007890-198610000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Morris R. J., Williams A. F. Antigens on mouse and rat lymphocytes recognized by rabbit antiserum against rat brain: the quantitative analysis of a xenogeneic antiserum. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Apr;5(4):274–281. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Murphy K. M., Heimberger A. B., Loh D. Y. Induction by antigen of intrathymic apoptosis of CD4+CD8+TCRlo thymocytes in vivo. Science. 1990 Dec 21;250(4988):1720–1723. doi: 10.1126/science.2125367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Noelle R. J., Snow E. C. Cognate interactions between helper T cells and B cells. Immunol Today. 1990 Oct;11(10):361–368. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(90)90142-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Parham P., Lomen C. E., Lawlor D. A., Ways J. P., Holmes N., Coppin H. L., Salter R. D., Wan A. M., Ennis P. D. Nature of polymorphism in HLA-A, -B, and -C molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(11):4005–4009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.11.4005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paul W. E., Katz D. H., Goidl E. A., Benacerraf B. Carrier function in anti-hapten immune responses. II. Specific properties of carrier cells capable of enhancing anti-hapten antibody responses. J Exp Med. 1970 Aug 1;132(2):283–299. doi: 10.1084/jem.132.2.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rada C., Lorenzi R., Powis S. J., van den Bogaerde J., Parham P., Howard J. C. Concerted evolution of class I genes in the major histocompatibility complex of murine rodents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(6):2167–2171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.6.2167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Rudensky AYu, Preston-Hurlburt P., Hong S. C., Barlow A., Janeway C. A., Jr Sequence analysis of peptides bound to MHC class II molecules. Nature. 1991 Oct 17;353(6345):622–627. doi: 10.1038/353622a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. STEINMULLER D. Passive transfer of immunity to skin homografts in rats. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1962 Oct 24;99:629–644. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb45346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sherwood R. A., Brent L., Rayfield L. S. Presentation of alloantigens by host cells. Eur J Immunol. 1986 May;16(5):569–574. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830160519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Singer A., Kruisbeek A. M., Andrysiak P. M. T cell-accessory cell interactions that initiate allospecific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses: existence of both Ia-restricted and Ia-unrestricted cellular interaction pathways. J Immunol. 1984 May;132(5):2199–2209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Steinman R. M., Witmer M. D. Lymphoid dendritic cells are potent stimulators of the primary mixed leukocyte reaction in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Oct;75(10):5132–5136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.10.5132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Weinberger O., Germain R. N., Springer T., Burakoff S. J. Role of syngeneic Ia+ accessory cells in the generation of allospecific CTL responses. J Immunol. 1982 Aug;129(2):694–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Weinberger O., Herrmann S., Mescher M. F., Benacerraf B., Burakoff S. J. Cellular interactions in the generation of cytolytic T lymphocyte responses. Analysis of the helper T cell pathway. Eur J Immunol. 1981 May;11(5):405–411. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830110511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Williams A. F., Galfrè G., Milstein C. Analysis of cell surfaces by xenogeneic myeloma-hybrid antibodies: differentiation antigens of rat lymphocytes. Cell. 1977 Nov;12(3):663–673. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90266-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. von Willebrand E., Soots A., Häyry P. In situ effector mechanisms in rat kidney allograft rejection. I. Characterization of the host cellular infiltrate in rejecting allograft parenchyma. Cell Immunol. 1979 Sep 1;46(2):309–326. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(79)90419-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES