Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1993 Jan 1;120(1):175–184. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.1.175

Determinants of the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm

PMCID: PMC2119503  PMID: 8416987

Abstract

The purposes of this study were: (a) to measure the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm; (b) to define quantitatively the factors that determine solute translation; and (c) to compare and contrast solute rotation and translation. A small fluorescent probe, 2,7-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and 6-)- carboxyfluorescein (BCECF), was introduced into the cytoplasm of Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. BCECF translation was measured by fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching; rotation was measured by Fourier transform polarization microscopy. Diffusion coefficients relative to those in water (D/D0) were determined by comparing mobility in cytoplasm with mobility in standard solutions of known viscosity. At isosmotic cell volume, the relative diffusion coefficients for BCECF translation and rotation in cytoplasm were 0.27 +/- 0.01 (SEM, n = 24, 23 degrees C) and 0.78 +/- 0.03 (n = 4), respectively. As cell volume increased from 0.33 to 2 times isosmotic volume, the relative translational diffusion coefficient increased from 0.047 to 0.32, while the relative rotational diffusion coefficient remained constant. The factors determining BCECF translation were evaluated by comparing rotation and translation in cytoplasm, and in artificial solutions containing dextrans (mobile barriers) and agarose gels (immobile barriers). It was concluded that the hindrance of BCECF translation in cytoplasm could be quantitatively attributed to three independent factors: (a) fluid-phase cytoplasmic viscosity is 28% greater than the viscosity of water (factor 1 = 0.78); (b) 19% of BCECF is transiently bound to intracellular components of low mobility (factor 2 = 0.81); and most importantly, (c) translation of unbound BCECF is hindered 2.5- fold by collisions with cell solids comprising 13% of isosmotic cell volume (factor 3 = 0.40). The product of the 3 factors is 0.25 +/- 0.03, in good agreement with the measured D/D0 of 0.27 +/- 0.01. These results provide the first measurement of the translational mobility of a small solute in cell cytoplasm and define quantitatively the factors that slow solute translation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axelrod D., Koppel D. E., Schlessinger J., Elson E., Webb W. W. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J. 1976 Sep;16(9):1055–1069. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85755-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barisas B. G. Criticality of beam alignment in fluorescence photobleaching recovery experiments. Biophys J. 1980 Mar;29(3):545–548. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(80)85153-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bjarneson D. W., Petersen N. O. Effects of second order photobleaching on recovered diffusion parameters from fluorescence photobleaching recovery. Biophys J. 1991 Nov;60(5):1128–1131. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82148-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackwell M. F., Whitmarsh J. Effect of integral membrane proteins on the lateral mobility of plastoquinone in phosphatidylcholine proteoliposomes. Biophys J. 1990 Nov;58(5):1259–1271. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82466-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blatter L. A., Wier W. G. Intracellular diffusion, binding, and compartmentalization of the fluorescent calcium indicators indo-1 and fura-2. Biophys J. 1990 Dec;58(6):1491–1499. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82494-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bridgman P. C., Reese T. S. The structure of cytoplasm in directly frozen cultured cells. I. Filamentous meshworks and the cytoplasmic ground substance. J Cell Biol. 1984 Nov;99(5):1655–1668. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.5.1655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Calafut T. M., Dix J. A., Verkman A. S. Fluorescence depolarization of cis- and trans-parinaric acids in artificial and red cell membranes resolved by a double hindered rotational model. Biochemistry. 1989 Jun 13;28(12):5051–5058. doi: 10.1021/bi00438a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chao A. C., Dix J. A., Sellers M. C., Verkman A. S. Fluorescence measurement of chloride transport in monolayer cultured cells. Mechanisms of chloride transport in fibroblasts. Biophys J. 1989 Dec;56(6):1071–1081. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82755-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clegg J. S. Intracellular water and the cytomatrix: some methods of study and current views. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 2):167s–171s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.167s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dix J. A., Verkman A. S. Mapping of fluorescence anisotropy in living cells by ratio imaging. Application to cytoplasmic viscosity. Biophys J. 1990 Feb;57(2):231–240. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82526-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Elson E. L., Qian H. Interpretation of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and photobleaching recovery in terms of molecular interactions. Methods Cell Biol. 1989;30:307–332. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60984-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Elson E. L., Reidler J. A. Analysis of cell surface interactions by measurements of lateral mobility. J Supramol Struct. 1979;12(4):481–489. doi: 10.1002/jss.400120408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fulton A. B. How crowded is the cytoplasm? Cell. 1982 Sep;30(2):345–347. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90231-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fushimi K., Dix J. A., Verkman A. S. Cell membrane fluidity in the intact kidney proximal tubule measured by orientation-independent fluorescence anisotropy imaging. Biophys J. 1990 Feb;57(2):241–254. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82527-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fushimi K., Verkman A. S. Low viscosity in the aqueous domain of cell cytoplasm measured by picosecond polarization microfluorimetry. J Cell Biol. 1991 Feb;112(4):719–725. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.4.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gershon N. D., Porter K. R., Trus B. L. The cytoplasmic matrix: its volume and surface area and the diffusion of molecules through it. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Aug;82(15):5030–5034. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.15.5030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hou L., Lanni F., Luby-Phelps K. Tracer diffusion in F-actin and Ficoll mixtures. Toward a model for cytoplasm. Biophys J. 1990 Jul;58(1):31–43. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82351-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacobson K., Ishihara A., Inman R. Lateral diffusion of proteins in membranes. Annu Rev Physiol. 1987;49:163–175. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.49.030187.001115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacobson K., Wojcieszyn J. The translational mobility of substances within the cytoplasmic matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Nov;81(21):6747–6751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.21.6747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jähnig F. No need for a new membrane model. Nature. 1981 Feb 19;289(5799):694–696. doi: 10.1038/289694a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Keith A. D., Snipes W., Mehlhorn R. J., Gunter T. Factors restricting diffusion of water-soluble spin labels. Biophys J. 1977 Sep;19(3):205–218. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85582-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Keith A. D., Snipes W. Viscosity of cellular protoplasm. Science. 1974 Feb 15;183(4125):666–668. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4125.666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Koppel D. E. Association dynamics and lateral transport in biological membranes. J Supramol Struct Cell Biochem. 1981;17(1):61–67. doi: 10.1002/jsscb.380170107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kreis T. E., Geiger B., Schlessinger J. Mobility of microinjected rhodamine actin within living chicken gizzard cells determined by fluorescence photobleaching recovery. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):835–845. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90445-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lepock J. R., Cheng K. H., Campbell S. D., Kruuv J. Rotational diffusion of TEMPONE in the cytoplasm of Chinese hamster lung cells. Biophys J. 1983 Dec;44(3):405–412. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(83)84314-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lindmo T., Steen H. B. Flow cytometric measurement of the polarization of fluorescence from intracellular fluorescein in mammalian cells. Biophys J. 1977 May;18(2):173–187. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85606-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Luby-Phelps K., Castle P. E., Taylor D. L., Lanni F. Hindered diffusion of inert tracer particles in the cytoplasm of mouse 3T3 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jul;84(14):4910–4913. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.14.4910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luby-Phelps K., Lanni F., Taylor D. L. The submicroscopic properties of cytoplasm as a determinant of cellular function. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1988;17:369–396. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.17.060188.002101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Luby-Phelps K., Taylor D. L., Lanni F. Probing the structure of cytoplasm. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jun;102(6):2015–2022. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.6.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Luby-Phelps K., Taylor D. L. Subcellular compartmentalization by local differentiation of cytoplasmic structure. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;10(1-2):28–37. doi: 10.1002/cm.970100107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mastro A. M., Babich M. A., Taylor W. D., Keith A. D. Diffusion of a small molecule in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(11):3414–3418. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.11.3414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mastro A. M., Keith A. D. Diffusion in the aqueous compartment. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 2):180s–187s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.180s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Periasamy N., Kao H. P., Fushimi K., Verkman A. S. Organic osmolytes increase cytoplasmic viscosity in kidney cells. Am J Physiol. 1992 Oct;263(4 Pt 1):C901–C907. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1992.263.4.C901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Porter K. R. The cytomatrix: a short history of its study. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 2):3s–12s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.3s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Verkman A. S., Armijo M., Fushimi K. Construction and evaluation of a frequency-domain epifluorescence microscope for lifetime and anisotropy decay measurements in subcellular domains. Biophys Chem. 1991 Apr;40(1):117–125. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(91)85036-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang Y. L., Lanni F., McNeil P. L., Ware B. R., Taylor D. L. Mobility of cytoplasmic and membrane-associated actin in living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Aug;79(15):4660–4664. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.15.4660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wojcieszyn J. W., Schlegel R. A., Wu E. S., Jacobson K. A. Diffusion of injected macromolecules within the cytoplasm of living cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jul;78(7):4407–4410. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.7.4407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES