Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1993 Jul 1;122(1):113–121. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.1.113

Dynamic changes in microtubule configuration correlate with nuclear migration in the preblastoderm Drosophila embryo

PMCID: PMC2119602  PMID: 8314839

Abstract

Drosophila embryogenesis is initiated by a series of syncytial mitotic divisions. The first nine of these divisions are internal, and are accompanied by two temporally distinct nuclear movements that lead to the formation of a syncytial blastoderm with a uniform monolayer of cortical nuclei. The first of these movements, which we term axial expansion, occurs during division cycles 4-6 and distributes nuclei in a hollow ellipsoid underlying the cortex. This is followed by cortical migration, during cycles 7-10, which places the nuclei in a uniform monolayer at the cortex. Here we report that these two movements differ in their geometry, velocity, cell-cycle dependence, and protein synthesis requirement. We therefore conclude that axial expansion and cortical migration are mechanistically distinct, amplifying a similar conclusion based on pharmacological data (Zalokar and Erk, 1976). We have examined microtubule organization during cortical migration and find that a network of interdigitating microtubules connects the migrating nuclei. These anti-parallel microtubule arrays are observed between migrating nuclei and yolk nuclei located deeper in the embryo. These arrays are present during nuclear movement but break down when the nuclei are not moving. We propose that cortical migration is driven by microtubule-dependent forces that repel adjacent nuclei, leading to an expansion of the nuclear ellipsoid established by axial expansion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Edgar B. A., Kiehle C. P., Schubiger G. Cell cycle control by the nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio in early Drosophila development. Cell. 1986 Jan 31;44(2):365–372. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90771-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Edgar B. A., Odell G. M., Schubiger G. Cytoarchitecture and the patterning of fushi tarazu expression in the Drosophila blastoderm. Genes Dev. 1987 Dec;1(10):1226–1237. doi: 10.1101/gad.1.10.1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edgar B. A., Schubiger G. Parameters controlling transcriptional activation during early Drosophila development. Cell. 1986 Mar 28;44(6):871–877. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90009-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Edgar B. A., Weir M. P., Schubiger G., Kornberg T. Repression and turnover pattern fushi tarazu RNA in the early Drosophila embryo. Cell. 1986 Dec 5;47(5):747–754. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90517-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Foe V. E., Alberts B. M. Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. J Cell Sci. 1983 May;61:31–70. doi: 10.1242/jcs.61.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gard D. L., Hafezi S., Zhang T., Doxsey S. J. Centrosome duplication continues in cycloheximide-treated Xenopus blastulae in the absence of a detectable cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;110(6):2033–2042. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.6.2033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hatanaka K., Okada M. Retarded nuclear migration in Drosophila embryos with aberrant F-actin reorganization caused by maternal mutations and by cytochalasin treatment. Development. 1991 Apr;111(4):909–920. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.4.909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karr T. L., Alberts B. M. Organization of the cytoskeleton in early Drosophila embryos. J Cell Biol. 1986 Apr;102(4):1494–1509. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.4.1494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kellogg D. R., Mitchison T. J., Alberts B. M. Behaviour of microtubules and actin filaments in living Drosophila embryos. Development. 1988 Aug;103(4):675–686. doi: 10.1242/dev.103.4.675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sluder G., Miller F. J., Cole R., Rieder C. L. Protein synthesis and the cell cycle: centrosome reproduction in sea urchin eggs is not under translational control. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jun;110(6):2025–2032. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.6.2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sluder G., Miller F. J., Rieder C. L. The reproduction of centrosomes: nuclear versus cytoplasmic controls. J Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;103(5):1873–1881. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.5.1873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Theurkauf W. E. Behavior of structurally divergent alpha-tubulin isotypes during Drosophila embryogenesis: evidence for post-translational regulation of isotype abundance. Dev Biol. 1992 Nov;154(1):205–217. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(92)90060-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Warn R. M., Magrath R., Webb S. Distribution of F-actin during cleavage of the Drosophila syncytial blastoderm. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jan;98(1):156–162. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.1.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Warn R. M., Warn A. Microtubule arrays present during the syncytial and cellular blastoderm stages of the early Drosophila embryo. Exp Cell Res. 1986 Mar;163(1):201–210. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(86)90573-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Weir M. P., Edgar B. A., Kornberg T., Schubiger G. Spatial regulation of engrailed expression in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 1988 Sep;2(9):1194–1203. doi: 10.1101/gad.2.9.1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yasuda G. K., Baker J., Schubiger G. Independent roles of centrosomes and DNA in organizing the Drosophila cytoskeleton. Development. 1991 Feb;111(2):379–391. doi: 10.1242/dev.111.2.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES