Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1993 Aug 1;122(3):729–737. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.3.729

Maximal migration of human smooth muscle cells on fibronectin and type IV collagen occurs at an intermediate attachment strength

PMCID: PMC2119669  PMID: 8335696

Abstract

Although a biphasic dependence of cell migration speed on cell- substratum adhesiveness has been predicted theoretically, experimental data directly demonstrating a relationship between these two phenomena have been lacking. To determine whether an optimal strength of cell- substratum adhesive interactions exists for cell migration, we measured quantitatively both the initial attachment strength and migration speed of human smooth muscle cells (HSMCs) on a range of surface concentrations of fibronectin (Fn) and type IV collagen (CnIV). Initial attachment strength was measured in order to characterize short time- scale cell-substratum interactions, which may be representative of dynamic interactions involved in cell migration. The critical fluid shear stress for cell detachment, determined in a radial-flow detachment assay, increased linearly with the surface concentrations of adsorbed Fn and CnIV. The detachment stress required for cells on Fn, 3.6 +/- 0.2 x 10(-3) mu dynes/absorbed molecule, was much greater than that on CnIV, 5.0 +/- 1.4 x 10(-5) mu dynes/absorbed molecule. Time- lapse videomicroscopy of individual cell movement paths showed that the migration behavior of HSMCs on these substrates varied with the absorbed concentration of each matrix protein, exhibiting biphasic dependence. Cell speed reached a maximum at intermediate concentrations of both proteins, with optimal concentrations for migration at 1 x 10(3) molecules/micron2 and 1 x 10(4) molecules/micron2 on Fn and CnIV, respectively. These optimal protein concentrations represent optimal initial attachment strengths corresponding to detachment shear stresses of 3.8 mu dyne/micron2 on Fn and 1.5 mu dyne/micron2 on CnIV. Thus, while the optimal absorbed protein concentrations for migration on Fn and CnIV differed by an order of magnitude, the optimal initial attachment strengths for migration on these two proteins were very similar. Further, the same minimum strength of initial attachment, corresponding to a detachment shear stress of approximately 1 mu dyne/micron2, was required for movement on either protein. These results suggest that initial cell-substratum attachment strength is a central variable governing cell migration speed, able to correlate observations of motility on substrata differing in adhesiveness. They also demonstrate that migration speed depends in biphasic manner on attachment strength, with maximal migration at an intermediate level of cell-substratum adhesiveness.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akiyama S. K., Yamada K. M. The interaction of plasma fibronectin with fibroblastic cells in suspension. J Biol Chem. 1985 Apr 10;260(7):4492–4500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albelda S. M., Buck C. A. Integrins and other cell adhesion molecules. FASEB J. 1990 Aug;4(11):2868–2880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basson C. T., Knowles W. J., Bell L., Albelda S. M., Castronovo V., Liotta L. A., Madri J. A. Spatiotemporal segregation of endothelial cell integrin and nonintegrin extracellular matrix-binding proteins during adhesion events. J Cell Biol. 1990 Mar;110(3):789–801. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.3.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer J. S., Schreiner C. L., Giancotti F. G., Ruoslahti E., Juliano R. L. Motility of fibronectin receptor-deficient cells on fibronectin and vitronectin: collaborative interactions among integrins. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jan;116(2):477–487. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.2.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bell G. I. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science. 1978 May 12;200(4342):618–627. doi: 10.1126/science.347575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bretscher M. S. Circulating integrins: alpha 5 beta 1, alpha 6 beta 4 and Mac-1, but not alpha 3 beta 1, alpha 4 beta 1 or LFA-1. EMBO J. 1992 Feb;11(2):405–410. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05068.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burridge K., Fath K., Kelly T., Nuckolls G., Turner C. Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:487–525. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Calof A. L., Lander A. D. Relationship between neuronal migration and cell-substratum adhesion: laminin and merosin promote olfactory neuronal migration but are anti-adhesive. J Cell Biol. 1991 Nov;115(3):779–794. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.3.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Clyman R. I., Turner D. C., Kramer R. H. An alpha 1/beta 1-like integrin receptor on rat aortic smooth muscle cells mediates adhesion to laminin and collagen types I and IV. Arteriosclerosis. 1990 May-Jun;10(3):402–409. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.10.3.402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cozens-Roberts C., Quinn J. A., Lauffenberger D. A. Receptor-mediated adhesion phenomena. Model studies with the Radical-Flow Detachment Assay. Biophys J. 1990 Jul;58(1):107–125. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82357-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dejana E., Colella S., Languino L. R., Balconi G., Corbascio G. C., Marchisio P. C. Fibrinogen induces adhesion, spreading, and microfilament organization of human endothelial cells in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1987 May;104(5):1403–1411. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.5.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Devreotes P. N., Zigmond S. H. Chemotaxis in eukaryotic cells: a focus on leukocytes and Dictyostelium. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:649–686. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.003245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. DiMilla P. A., Barbee K., Lauffenburger D. A. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. Biophys J. 1991 Jul;60(1):15–37. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82027-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Duband J. L., Dufour S., Yamada S. S., Yamada K. M., Thiery J. P. Neural crest cell locomotion induced by antibodies to beta 1 integrins. A tool for studying the roles of substratum molecular avidity and density in migration. J Cell Sci. 1991 Apr;98(Pt 4):517–532. doi: 10.1242/jcs.98.4.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dunn G. A. Characterising a kinesis response: time averaged measures of cell speed and directional persistence. Agents Actions Suppl. 1983;12:14–33. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9352-7_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dustin M. L., Springer T. A. T-cell receptor cross-linking transiently stimulates adhesiveness through LFA-1. Nature. 1989 Oct 19;341(6243):619–624. doi: 10.1038/341619a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gail M. H., Boone C. W. The locomotion of mouse fibroblasts in tissue culture. Biophys J. 1970 Oct;10(10):980–993. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86347-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodman S. L., Risse G., von der Mark K. The E8 subfragment of laminin promotes locomotion of myoblasts over extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol. 1989 Aug;109(2):799–809. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.2.799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Heath J. P., Holifield B. F. Cell locomotion: new research tests old ideas on membrane and cytoskeletal flow. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1991;18(4):245–257. doi: 10.1002/cm.970180402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hemler M. E. VLA proteins in the integrin family: structures, functions, and their role on leukocytes. Annu Rev Immunol. 1990;8:365–400. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.08.040190.002053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Horwitz A., Duggan K., Buck C., Beckerle M. C., Burridge K. Interaction of plasma membrane fibronectin receptor with talin--a transmembrane linkage. Nature. 1986 Apr 10;320(6062):531–533. doi: 10.1038/320531a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hynes R. O. Integrins: a family of cell surface receptors. Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):549–554. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90233-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Regen C. M., Horwitz A. F. Dynamics of beta 1 integrin-mediated adhesive contacts in motile fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;119(5):1347–1359. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.5.1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis--an update. N Engl J Med. 1986 Feb 20;314(8):488–500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198602203140806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Singer S. J., Kupfer A. The directed migration of eukaryotic cells. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1986;2:337–365. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.02.110186.002005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stokes C. L., Lauffenburger D. A., Williams S. K. Migration of individual microvessel endothelial cells: stochastic model and parameter measurement. J Cell Sci. 1991 Jun;99(Pt 2):419–430. doi: 10.1242/jcs.99.2.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Straus A. H., Carter W. G., Wayner E. A., Hakomori S. Mechanism of fibronectin-mediated cell migration: dependence or independence of cell migration susceptibility on RGDS-directed receptor (integrin). Exp Cell Res. 1989 Jul;183(1):126–139. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(89)90423-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tan E. M., Dodge G. R., Sorger T., Kovalszky I., Unger G. A., Yang L., Levine E. M., Iozzo R. V. Modulation of extracellular matrix gene expression by heparin and endothelial cell growth factor in human smooth muscle cells. Lab Invest. 1991 Apr;64(4):474–482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES