Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1993 Jun 2;121(6):1357–1368. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.6.1357

Porters versus rowers: a unified stochastic model of motor proteins

PMCID: PMC2119711  PMID: 8509455

Abstract

We present a general phenomenological theory for chemical to mechanical energy transduction by motor enzymes which is based on the classical "tight-coupling" mechanism. The associated minimal stochastic model takes explicitly into account both ATP hydrolysis and thermal noise effects. It provides expressions for the hydrolysis rate and the sliding velocity, as functions of the ATP concentration and the number of motor enzymes. It explains in a unified way many results of recent in vitro motility assays. More importantly, the theory provides a natural classification scheme for the motors: it correlates the biochemical and mechanical differences between "porters" such as cellular kinesins or dyneins, and "rowers" such as muscular myosins or flagellar dyneins.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.3 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Block S. M., Goldstein L. S., Schnapp B. J. Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers. Nature. 1990 Nov 22;348(6299):348–352. doi: 10.1038/348348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Córdova N. J., Ermentrout B., Oster G. F. Dynamics of single-motor molecules: the thermal ratchet model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):339–343. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eisenberg E., Hill T. L. Muscle contraction and free energy transduction in biological systems. Science. 1985 Mar 1;227(4690):999–1006. doi: 10.1126/science.3156404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HILL A. V. The heat of activation and the heat of shortening in a muscle twitch. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1949 Jun 23;136(883):195–211. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1949.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hackney D. D. Kinesin ATPase: rate-limiting ADP release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Sep;85(17):6314–6318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harada Y., Noguchi A., Kishino A., Yanagida T. Sliding movement of single actin filaments on one-headed myosin filaments. Nature. 1987 Apr 23;326(6115):805–808. doi: 10.1038/326805a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Holmes K. C., Popp D., Gebhard W., Kabsch W. Atomic model of the actin filament. Nature. 1990 Sep 6;347(6288):44–49. doi: 10.1038/347044a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Howard J., Hudspeth A. J., Vale R. D. Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules. Nature. 1989 Nov 9;342(6246):154–158. doi: 10.1038/342154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Huxley H. E. Sliding filaments and molecular motile systems. J Biol Chem. 1990 May 25;265(15):8347–8350. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Huxley H. E. The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1356–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ishijima A., Doi T., Sakurada K., Yanagida T. Sub-piconewton force fluctuations of actomyosin in vitro. Nature. 1991 Jul 25;352(6333):301–306. doi: 10.1038/352301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson K. A. Pathway of the microtubule-dynein ATPase and the structure of dynein: a comparison with actomyosin. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1985;14:161–188. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.14.060185.001113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kron S. J., Spudich J. A. Fluorescent actin filaments move on myosin fixed to a glass surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(17):6272–6276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.17.6272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kuznetsov S. A., Gelfand V. I. Bovine brain kinesin is a microtubule-activated ATPase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(22):8530–8534. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.22.8530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leibler S., Huse D. A. A physical model for motor proteins. C R Acad Sci III. 1991;313(1):27–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lymn R. W., Taylor E. W. Mechanism of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis by actomyosin. Biochemistry. 1971 Dec 7;10(25):4617–4624. doi: 10.1021/bi00801a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McIntosh J. R., Porter M. E. Enzymes for microtubule-dependent motility. J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 15;264(11):6001–6004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Omoto C. K., Johnson K. A. Activation of the dynein adenosinetriphosphatase by microtubules. Biochemistry. 1986 Jan 28;25(2):419–427. doi: 10.1021/bi00350a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pollard T. D. The myosin crossbridge problem. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):909–910. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90087-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Romberg L., Vale R. D. Chemomechanical cycle of kinesin differs from that of myosin. Nature. 1993 Jan 14;361(6408):168–170. doi: 10.1038/361168a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Saxton W. M., Porter M. E., Cohn S. A., Scholey J. M., Raff E. C., McIntosh J. R. Drosophila kinesin: characterization of microtubule motility and ATPase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Feb;85(4):1109–1113. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.4.1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Spudich J. A. Optical trapping: Motor molecules in motion. Nature. 1990 Nov 22;348(6299):284–285. doi: 10.1038/348284a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tawada K., Sekimoto K. A physical model of ATP-induced actin-myosin movement in vitro. Biophys J. 1991 Feb;59(2):343–356. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82228-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tawada K., Sekimoto K. Protein friction exerted by motor enzymes through a weak-binding interaction. J Theor Biol. 1991 May 21;150(2):193–200. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80331-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Taylor E. W. Cell motility. Variations on the theme of movement. Nature. 1993 Jan 14;361(6408):115–116. doi: 10.1038/361115a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Toyoshima Y. Y., Kron S. J., Spudich J. A. The myosin step size: measurement of the unit displacement per ATP hydrolyzed in an in vitro assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(18):7130–7134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.18.7130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Uyeda T. Q., Kron S. J., Spudich J. A. Myosin step size. Estimation from slow sliding movement of actin over low densities of heavy meromyosin. J Mol Biol. 1990 Aug 5;214(3):699–710. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90287-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Uyeda T. Q., Warrick H. M., Kron S. J., Spudich J. A. Quantized velocities at low myosin densities in an in vitro motility assay. Nature. 1991 Jul 25;352(6333):307–311. doi: 10.1038/352307a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vale R. D. Microtubule-based motor proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1990 Feb;2(1):15–22. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(05)80025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vale R. D., Oosawa F. Protein motors and Maxwell's demons: does mechanochemical transduction involve a thermal ratchet? Adv Biophys. 1990;26:97–134. doi: 10.1016/0065-227x(90)90009-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vale R. D., Soll D. R., Gibbons I. R. One-dimensional diffusion of microtubules bound to flagellar dynein. Cell. 1989 Dec 1;59(5):915–925. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90614-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vale R. D., Toyoshima Y. Y. Rotation and translocation of microtubules in vitro induced by dyneins from Tetrahymena cilia. Cell. 1988 Feb 12;52(3):459–469. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80038-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Winkelmann D. A., Baker T. S., Rayment I. Three-dimensional structure of myosin subfragment-1 from electron microscopy of sectioned crystals. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(4):701–713. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES