Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1994 Jul 1;126(1):189–198. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.1.189

Feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes: role of maloriented chromosomes

PMCID: PMC2120099  PMID: 8027177

Abstract

To help ensure the fidelity of chromosome transmission during mitosis, sea urchin zygotes have feedback control mechanisms for the metaphase- anaphase transition that monitor the assembly of spindle microtubules and the complete absence of proper chromosome attachment to the spindle. The way in which these feedback controls work has not been known. In this study we directly test the proposal that these controls operate by maloriented chromosomes producing a diffusible inhibitor of the metaphase-anaphase transition. We show that zygotes having 50% of their chromosomes (approximately 20) unattached or monoriented initiate anaphase at the same time as the controls, a time that is well within the maximum period these zygotes will spend in mitosis. In vivo observations of the unattached maternal chromosomes indicate that they are functionally within the sphere of influence of the molecular events that cause chromosome disjunction in the spindle. Although the unattached chromosomes disjoin (anaphase onset without chromosome movement) several minutes after spindle anaphase onset, their disjunction is correlated with the time of spindle anaphase onset, not the time their nucleus breaks down. This suggests that the molecular events that trigger chromosome disjunction originate in the central spindle and propagate outward. Our results show that the mechanisms for the feedback control of the metaphase-anaphase transition in sea urchin zygotes do not involve a diffusible inhibitor produced by maloriented chromosomes. Even though the feedback controls for the metaphase- anaphase transition may detect the complete absence of properly attached chromosomes, they are insensitive to unattached or mono- oriented chromosomes as long as some chromosomes are properly attached to the spindle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernat R. L., Borisy G. G., Rothfield N. F., Earnshaw W. C. Injection of anticentromere antibodies in interphase disrupts events required for chromosome movement at mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;111(4):1519–1533. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.4.1519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Earnshaw W. C., Bernat R. L., Cooke C. A., Rothfield N. F. Role of the centromere/kinetochore in cell cycle control. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1991;56:675–685. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1991.056.01.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fuseler J. W. Repetitive procurement of mature gametes from individual sea stars and sea urchins. J Cell Biol. 1973 Jun;57(3):879–881. doi: 10.1083/jcb.57.3.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gorbsky G. J., Ricketts W. A. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;122(6):1311–1321. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.6.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartwell L. H., Weinert T. A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):629–634. doi: 10.1126/science.2683079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holloway S. L., Glotzer M., King R. W., Murray A. W. Anaphase is initiated by proteolysis rather than by the inactivation of maturation-promoting factor. Cell. 1993 Jul 2;73(7):1393–1402. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90364-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hoyt M. A., Totis L., Roberts B. T. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):507–517. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hyman A. A., Mitchison T. J. Two different microtubule-based motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores. Nature. 1991 May 16;351(6323):206–211. doi: 10.1038/351206a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jordan M. A., Toso R. J., Thrower D., Wilson L. Mechanism of mitotic block and inhibition of cell proliferation by taxol at low concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9552–9556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Leslie R. J. Chromosomes attain a metaphase position on half-spindles in the absence of an opposing spindle pole. J Cell Sci. 1992 Sep;103(Pt 1):125–130. doi: 10.1242/jcs.103.1.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li R., Murray A. W. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 1991 Aug 9;66(3):519–531. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKim K. S., Jang J. K., Theurkauf W. E., Hawley R. S. Mechanical basis of meiotic metaphase arrest. Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):364–366. doi: 10.1038/362364a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Murray A. W. Creative blocks: cell-cycle checkpoints and feedback controls. Nature. 1992 Oct 15;359(6396):599–604. doi: 10.1038/359599a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nicklas R. B., Arana P. Evolution and the meaning of metaphase. J Cell Sci. 1992 Aug;102(Pt 4):681–690. doi: 10.1242/jcs.102.4.681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nicklas R. B., Krawitz L. E., Ward S. C. Odd chromosome movement and inaccurate chromosome distribution in mitosis and meiosis after treatment with protein kinase inhibitors. J Cell Sci. 1993 Apr;104(Pt 4):961–973. doi: 10.1242/jcs.104.4.961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nislow C., Lombillo V. A., Kuriyama R., McIntosh J. R. A plus-end-directed motor enzyme that moves antiparallel microtubules in vitro localizes to the interzone of mitotic spindles. Nature. 1992 Oct 8;359(6395):543–547. doi: 10.1038/359543a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nislow C., Sellitto C., Kuriyama R., McIntosh J. R. A monoclonal antibody to a mitotic microtubule-associated protein blocks mitotic progression. J Cell Biol. 1990 Aug;111(2):511–522. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.2.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rieder C. L., Palazzo R. E. Colcemid and the mitotic cycle. J Cell Sci. 1992 Jul;102(Pt 3):387–392. doi: 10.1242/jcs.102.3.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Skibbens R. V., Skeen V. P., Salmon E. D. Directional instability of kinetochore motility during chromosome congression and segregation in mitotic newt lung cells: a push-pull mechanism. J Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;122(4):859–875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.4.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sluder G., Begg D. A. Control mechanisms of the cell cycle: role of the spatial arrangement of spindle components in the timing of mitotic events. J Cell Biol. 1983 Sep;97(3):877–886. doi: 10.1083/jcb.97.3.877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sluder G., Miller F. J., Rieder C. L. The reproduction of centrosomes: nuclear versus cytoplasmic controls. J Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;103(5):1873–1881. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.5.1873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sluder G., Rieder C. L. Experimental separation of pronuclei in fertilized sea urchin eggs: chromosomes do not organize a spindle in the absence of centrosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 Mar;100(3):897–903. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sluder G. Role of spindle microtubules in the control of cell cycle timing. J Cell Biol. 1979 Mar;80(3):674–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.3.674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Spencer F., Hieter P. Centromere DNA mutations induce a mitotic delay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Oct 1;89(19):8908–8912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.8908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wendell K. L., Wilson L., Jordan M. A. Mitotic block in HeLa cells by vinblastine: ultrastructural changes in kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in centrosomes. J Cell Sci. 1993 Feb;104(Pt 2):261–274. doi: 10.1242/jcs.104.2.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wright B. D., Terasaki M., Scholey J. M. Roles of kinesin and kinesin-like proteins in sea urchin embryonic cell division: evaluation using antibody microinjection. J Cell Biol. 1993 Nov;123(3):681–689. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Yen T. J., Compton D. A., Wise D., Zinkowski R. P., Brinkley B. R., Earnshaw W. C., Cleveland D. W. CENP-E, a novel human centromere-associated protein required for progression from metaphase to anaphase. EMBO J. 1991 May;10(5):1245–1254. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb08066.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yen T. J., Li G., Schaar B. T., Szilak I., Cleveland D. W. CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis. Nature. 1992 Oct 8;359(6395):536–539. doi: 10.1038/359536a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zieve G. W., Turnbull D., Mullins J. M., McIntosh J. R. Production of large numbers of mitotic mammalian cells by use of the reversible microtubule inhibitor nocodazole. Nocodazole accumulated mitotic cells. Exp Cell Res. 1980 Apr;126(2):397–405. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(80)90279-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zirkle R. E. Ultraviolet-microbeam irradiation of newt-cell cytoplasm: spindle destruction, false anaphase, and delay of true anaphase. Radiat Res. 1970 Mar;41(3):516–537. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES