Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1994 Aug 2;126(4):925–934. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.4.925

Binding of ribosomes to the rough endoplasmic reticulum mediated by the Sec61p-complex

PMCID: PMC2120124  PMID: 8051212

Abstract

The cotranslational translocation of proteins across the ER membrane involves the tight binding of translating ribosomes to the membrane, presumably to ribosome receptors. The identity of the latter has been controversial. One putative receptor candidate is Sec61 alpha, a multi- spanning membrane protein that is associated with two additional membrane proteins (Sec61 beta and gamma) to form the Sec61p-complex. Other receptors of 34 and 180 kD have also been proposed on the basis of their ability to bind at low salt concentration ribosomes lacking nascent chains. We now show that the Sec61p-complex has also binding activity but that, at low salt conditions, it accounts for only one third of the total binding sites in proteoliposomes reconstituted from a detergent extract of ER membranes. Under these conditions, the assay has also limited specificity with respect to ribosomes. However, if the ribosome-binding assay is performed at physiological salt concentration, most of the unspecific binding is lost; the Sec61p- complex then accounts for the majority of specific ribosome-binding sites in reconstituted ER membranes. To study the membrane interaction of ribosomes participating in protein translocation, native rough microsomes were treated with proteases. The amount of membrane-bound ribosomes is only slightly reduced by protease treatment, consistent with the protease-resistance of Sec61 alpha which is shielded by these ribosomes. In contrast, p34 and p180 can be readily degraded, indicating that they are not essential for the membrane anchoring of ribosomes in protease-treated microsomes. These data provide further evidence that the Sec61p-complex is responsible for the membrane- anchoring of ribosomes during translocation and make it unlikely that p34 or p180 are essential for this process.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.7 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adelman M. R., Sabatini D. D., Blobel G. Ribosome-membrane interaction. Nondestructive disassembly of rat liver rough microsomes into ribosomal and membranous components. J Cell Biol. 1973 Jan;56(1):206–229. doi: 10.1083/jcb.56.1.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borgese N., Mok W., Kreibich G., Sabatini D. D. Ribosomal-membrane interaction: in vitro binding of ribosomes to microsomal membranes. J Mol Biol. 1974 Sep 25;88(3):559–580. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90408-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins P. G., Gilmore R. Ribosome binding to the endoplasmic reticulum: a 180-kD protein identified by crosslinking to membrane-bound ribosomes is not required for ribosome binding activity. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(4):639–649. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Connolly T., Gilmore R. Formation of a functional ribosome-membrane junction during translocation requires the participation of a GTP-binding protein. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 1):2253–2261. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crowley K. S., Reinhart G. D., Johnson A. E. The signal sequence moves through a ribosomal tunnel into a noncytoplasmic aqueous environment at the ER membrane early in translocation. Cell. 1993 Jun 18;73(6):1101–1115. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90640-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Deshaies R. J., Schekman R. A yeast mutant defective at an early stage in import of secretory protein precursors into the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;105(2):633–645. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.2.633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Görlich D., Hartmann E., Prehn S., Rapoport T. A. A protein of the endoplasmic reticulum involved early in polypeptide translocation. Nature. 1992 May 7;357(6373):47–52. doi: 10.1038/357047a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Görlich D., Prehn S., Hartmann E., Kalies K. U., Rapoport T. A. A mammalian homolog of SEC61p and SECYp is associated with ribosomes and nascent polypeptides during translocation. Cell. 1992 Oct 30;71(3):489–503. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90517-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Görlich D., Rapoport T. A. Protein translocation into proteoliposomes reconstituted from purified components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell. 1993 Nov 19;75(4):615–630. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90483-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hartmann E., Sommer T., Prehn S., Görlich D., Jentsch S., Rapoport T. A. Evolutionary conservation of components of the protein translocation complex. Nature. 1994 Feb 17;367(6464):654–657. doi: 10.1038/367654a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ichimura T., Ohsumi T., Shindo Y., Ohwada T., Yagame H., Momose Y., Omata S., Sugano H. Isolation and some properties of a 34-kDa-membrane protein that may be responsible for ribosome binding in rat liver rough microsomes. FEBS Lett. 1992 Jan 13;296(1):7–10. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80391-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nunnari J. M., Zimmerman D. L., Ogg S. C., Walter P. Characterization of the rough endoplasmic reticulum ribosome-binding activity. Nature. 1991 Aug 15;352(6336):638–640. doi: 10.1038/352638a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rapoport T. A. Transport of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Science. 1992 Nov 6;258(5084):931–936. doi: 10.1126/science.1332192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Savitz A. J., Meyer D. I. 180-kD ribosome receptor is essential for both ribosome binding and protein translocation. J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(4):853–863. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.4.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Savitz A. J., Meyer D. I. Identification of a ribosome receptor in the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Nature. 1990 Aug 9;346(6284):540–544. doi: 10.1038/346540a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stirling C. J., Rothblatt J., Hosobuchi M., Deshaies R., Schekman R. Protein translocation mutants defective in the insertion of integral membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell. 1992 Feb;3(2):129–142. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tazawa S., Unuma M., Tondokoro N., Asano Y., Ohsumi T., Ichimura T., Sugano H. Identification of a membrane protein responsible for ribosome binding in rough microsomal membranes. J Biochem. 1991 Jan;109(1):89–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Walter P., Ibrahimi I., Blobel G. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum. I. Signal recognition protein (SRP) binds to in-vitro-assembled polysomes synthesizing secretory protein. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):545–550. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zimmerman D. L., Walter P. An ATP-binding membrane protein is required for protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell Regul. 1991 Oct;2(10):851–859. doi: 10.1091/mbc.2.10.851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES