Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1994 Sep 1;126(5):1127–1132. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.5.1127

The COOH-terminal ends of internal signal and signal-anchor sequences are positioned differently in the ER translocase

PMCID: PMC2120157  PMID: 8063852

Abstract

Signal peptides (SPs) target proteins to the secretory pathway and are cleaved from the nascent chain once the translocase in the ER has been engaged. Signal-anchor (SA) sequences also interact transiently with the ER translocase, but are not cleaved and move laterally out of the translocase to become permanent membrane anchors. One obvious difference between SP and SA sequences is the considerably longer hydrophobic regions (h regions) of the latter. To study the interaction between SP/SA sequences and the ER translocase, we have constructed signal sequences with poly-Leu h regions ranging in length from 8 to 29 residues and have characterized their locations within the translocase using both a new assay that measures the minimum number of amino acids needed to span the distance between the COOH-terminal end of the h region and the active site of the oligosaccharyl transferase enzyme and an assay where the efficiency of signal peptidase catalyzed cleavage is measured. Our results suggest that SP and SA sequences are positioned differently in the ER translocase.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1,010.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bairoch A., Boeckmann B. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Apr 25;19 (Suppl):2247–2249. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.suppl.2247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chou M. M., Kendall D. A. Polymeric sequences reveal a functional interrelationship between hydrophobicity and length of signal peptides. J Biol Chem. 1990 Feb 15;265(5):2873–2880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Crowley K. S., Reinhart G. D., Johnson A. E. The signal sequence moves through a ribosomal tunnel into a noncytoplasmic aqueous environment at the ER membrane early in translocation. Cell. 1993 Jun 18;73(6):1101–1115. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90640-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dalbey R. E., Von Heijne G. Signal peptidases in prokaryotes and eukaryotes--a new protease family. Trends Biochem Sci. 1992 Nov;17(11):474–478. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(92)90492-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Feldheim D., Yoshimura K., Admon A., Schekman R. Structural and functional characterization of Sec66p, a new subunit of the polypeptide translocation apparatus in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell. 1993 Sep;4(9):931–939. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.9.931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gavel Y., von Heijne G. Sequence differences between glycosylated and non-glycosylated Asn-X-Thr/Ser acceptor sites: implications for protein engineering. Protein Eng. 1990 Apr;3(5):433–442. doi: 10.1093/protein/3.5.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilmore R. Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum: a tunnel with toll booths at entry and exit. Cell. 1993 Nov 19;75(4):589–592. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90476-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Görlich D., Prehn S., Hartmann E., Kalies K. U., Rapoport T. A. A mammalian homolog of SEC61p and SECYp is associated with ribosomes and nascent polypeptides during translocation. Cell. 1992 Oct 30;71(3):489–503. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90517-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Görlich D., Rapoport T. A. Protein translocation into proteoliposomes reconstituted from purified components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Cell. 1993 Nov 19;75(4):615–630. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90483-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Haeuptle M. T., Frank R., Dobberstein B. Translation arrest by oligodeoxynucleotides complementary to mRNA coding sequences yields polypeptides of predetermined length. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Feb 11;14(3):1427–1448. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.3.1427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartmann E., Sommer T., Prehn S., Görlich D., Jentsch S., Rapoport T. A. Evolutionary conservation of components of the protein translocation complex. Nature. 1994 Feb 17;367(6464):654–657. doi: 10.1038/367654a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hegner M., von Kieckebusch-Gück A., Falchetto R., James P., Semenza G., Mantei N. Single amino acid substitutions can convert the uncleaved signal-anchor of sucrase-isomaltase to a cleaved signal sequence. J Biol Chem. 1992 Aug 25;267(24):16928–16933. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. High S., Andersen S. S., Görlich D., Hartmann E., Prehn S., Rapoport T. A., Dobberstein B. Sec61p is adjacent to nascent type I and type II signal-anchor proteins during their membrane insertion. J Cell Biol. 1993 May;121(4):743–750. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.4.743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. High S., Martoglio B., Görlich D., Andersen S. S., Ashford A. J., Giner A., Hartmann E., Prehn S., Rapoport T. A., Dobberstein B. Site-specific photocross-linking reveals that Sec61p and TRAM contact different regions of a membrane-inserted signal sequence. J Biol Chem. 1993 Dec 15;268(35):26745–26751. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johansson M., Nilsson I., von Heijne G. Positively charged amino acids placed next to a signal sequence block protein translocation more efficiently in Escherichia coli than in mammalian microsomes. Mol Gen Genet. 1993 May;239(1-2):251–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00281625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kozak M. Context effects and inefficient initiation at non-AUG codons in eucaryotic cell-free translation systems. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;9(11):5073–5080. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.11.5073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kunkel T. A. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Jan;82(2):488–492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kurzchalia T. V., Wiedmann M., Girshovich A. S., Bochkareva E. S., Bielka H., Rapoport T. A. The signal sequence of nascent preprolactin interacts with the 54K polypeptide of the signal recognition particle. Nature. 1986 Apr 17;320(6063):634–636. doi: 10.1038/320634a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liljeström P., Garoff H. Internally located cleavable signal sequences direct the formation of Semliki Forest virus membrane proteins from a polyprotein precursor. J Virol. 1991 Jan;65(1):147–154. doi: 10.1128/jvi.65.1.147-154.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lipp J., Dobberstein B. The membrane-spanning segment of invariant chain (I gamma) contains a potentially cleavable signal sequence. Cell. 1986 Sep 26;46(7):1103–1112. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90710-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lipp J., Flint N., Haeuptle M. T., Dobberstein B. Structural requirements for membrane assembly of proteins spanning the membrane several times. J Cell Biol. 1989 Nov;109(5):2013–2022. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.5.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lütcke H., High S., Römisch K., Ashford A. J., Dobberstein B. The methionine-rich domain of the 54 kDa subunit of signal recognition particle is sufficient for the interaction with signal sequences. EMBO J. 1992 Apr;11(4):1543–1551. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05199.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Miao G. H., Hong Z., Verma D. P. Topology and phosphorylation of soybean nodulin-26, an intrinsic protein of the peribacteroid membrane. J Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;118(2):481–490. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.2.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nilsson I. M., von Heijne G. Determination of the distance between the oligosaccharyltransferase active site and the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. J Biol Chem. 1993 Mar 15;268(8):5798–5801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nilsson I., von Heijne G. A de novo designed signal peptide cleavage cassette functions in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1991 Feb 25;266(6):3408–3410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Roy P., Chatellard C., Lemay G., Crine P., Boileau G. Transformation of the signal peptide/membrane anchor domain of a type II transmembrane protein into a cleavable signal peptide. J Biol Chem. 1993 Feb 5;268(4):2699–2704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sakaguchi M., Tomiyoshi R., Kuroiwa T., Mihara K., Omura T. Functions of signal and signal-anchor sequences are determined by the balance between the hydrophobic segment and the N-terminal charge. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):16–19. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmid S. R., Spiess M. Deletion of the amino-terminal domain of asialoglycoprotein receptor H1 allows cleavage of the internal signal sequence. J Biol Chem. 1988 Nov 15;263(32):16886–16891. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Walter P., Blobel G. Preparation of microsomal membranes for cotranslational protein translocation. Methods Enzymol. 1983;96:84–93. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(83)96010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Walter P., Blobel G. Signal recognition particle: a ribonucleoprotein required for cotranslational translocation of proteins, isolation and properties. Methods Enzymol. 1983;96:682–691. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(83)96057-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wessels H. P., Spiess M. Insertion of a multispanning membrane protein occurs sequentially and requires only one signal sequence. Cell. 1988 Oct 7;55(1):61–70. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. von Heijne G. Analysis of the distribution of charged residues in the N-terminal region of signal sequences: implications for protein export in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. EMBO J. 1984 Oct;3(10):2315–2318. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02132.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. von Heijne G. Membrane proteins: from sequence to structure. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:167–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.001123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. von Heijne G. Signal sequences. The limits of variation. J Mol Biol. 1985 Jul 5;184(1):99–105. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90046-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. von Heijne G. Towards a comparative anatomy of N-terminal topogenic protein sequences. J Mol Biol. 1986 May 5;189(1):239–242. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90394-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. von Heijne G. Transcending the impenetrable: how proteins come to terms with membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Jun 9;947(2):307–333. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(88)90013-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES