Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1995 Jan 1;128(1):81–94. doi: 10.1083/jcb.128.1.81

The anatomy of flagellar microtubules: polarity, seam, junctions, and lattice

PMCID: PMC2120334  PMID: 7822425

Abstract

Although the overall structures of flagellar and cytoplasmic microtubules are understood, many details have remained a matter of debate. In particular, studies of the arrangement of tubulin subunits have been hampered by the low contrast of the tubulin subunits. This problem can now be addressed by the kinesin decoration technique. We have shown previously that the recombinant kinesin head domain binds to beta-tubulin, thus enhancing the contrast between alpha- and beta- tubulin in the electron microscope; this allows one to study the arrangement of tubulin dimers. Here we describe the lattices of the four different types of microtubules in eukaryotic flagellar axonemes (outer doublet A and B, central pair C1 and C2). They could all be labeled with kinesin head with an 8-nm axial periodicity (the tubulin dimer repeat), and all of them showed the B-surface lattice. This lattice is characterized by a 0.92-nm stagger between adjacent protofilaments. The B-lattice was observed on the axonemal microtubules as well as on extensions made by polymerizing porcine brain tubulin onto axonemal microtubules in the proximal and distal directions. This emphasizes that axonemal microtubules serve as high fidelity templates for seeding microtubules. The presence of a B-lattice implies that there must be a helical discontinuity ("seam") in the wall. This discontinuity is now placed near protofilaments A1 and A2 of the A- tubule, close to the inner junction between A- and B-microtubules. The two junctions differ in structure: the protofilaments of the inner junction (A1-B10) are staggered roughly by half a dimer, those of the outer junction (A10-B1) are roughly in register. Of the two junctions the inner one appears to have the stronger bonds, whereas the outer one is more labile and opens up easily, generating "composite sheets" with chevron patterns from which the polarity can be deduced (arrow in the plus direction). Decorated microtubules have a clear polarity. We find that all flagellar microtubules have the same polarities. The orientation of the dimers is such that the plus end terminates with a crown of alpha subunits, the minus end terminates with beta subunits which thus could be in contact with gamma-tubulin at the nucleation centers.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos L., Klug A. Arrangement of subunits in flagellar microtubules. J Cell Sci. 1974 May;14(3):523–549. doi: 10.1242/jcs.14.3.523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell C. W., Fraser C., Sale W. S., Tang W. J., Gibbons I. R. Preparation and purification of dynein. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;24:373–397. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60666-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergen L. G., Borisy G. G. Head-to-tail polymerization of microtubules in vitro. Electron microscope analysis of seeded assembly. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jan;84(1):141–150. doi: 10.1083/jcb.84.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernstein M., Beech P. L., Katz S. G., Rosenbaum J. L. A new kinesin-like protein (Klp1) localized to a single microtubule of the Chlamydomonas flagellum. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jun;125(6):1313–1326. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.6.1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloom G. S. Motor proteins for cytoplasmic microtubules. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;4(1):66–73. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(92)90060-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brady S. T. A novel brain ATPase with properties expected for the fast axonal transport motor. Nature. 1985 Sep 5;317(6032):73–75. doi: 10.1038/317073a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Crepeau R. H., McEwen B., Edelstein S. J. Differences in alpha and beta polypeptide chains of tubulin resolved by electron microscopy with image reconstruction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Oct;75(10):5006–5010. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.10.5006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Erickson H. P. Microtubule surface lattice and subunit structure and observations on reassembly. J Cell Biol. 1974 Jan;60(1):153–167. doi: 10.1083/jcb.60.1.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Erickson H. P., O'Brien E. T. Microtubule dynamic instability and GTP hydrolysis. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1992;21:145–166. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.21.060192.001045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Euteneuer U., McIntosh J. R. Polarity of some motility-related microtubules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):372–376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Evans L., Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Influence of the centrosome on the structure of nucleated microtubules. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1185–1191. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gelles J., Schnapp B. J., Sheetz M. P. Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision. Nature. 1988 Feb 4;331(6155):450–453. doi: 10.1038/331450a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gibbons I. R., Fronk E. A latent adenosine triphosphatase form of dynein 1 from sea urchin sperm flagella. J Biol Chem. 1979 Jan 10;254(1):187–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldsmith M., Connolly J. A., Kumar N., Wu J., Yarbrough L. R., van der Kooy D. Conserved beta-tubulin binding domain for the microtubule-associated motors underlying sperm motility and fast axonal transport. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1991;20(3):249–262. doi: 10.1002/cm.970200308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldstein L. S. The kinesin superfamily: tails of functional redundancy. Trends Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;1(4):93–98. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(91)90036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Harrison B. C., Marchese-Ragona S. P., Gilbert S. P., Cheng N., Steven A. C., Johnson K. A. Decoration of the microtubule surface by one kinesin head per tubulin heterodimer. Nature. 1993 Mar 4;362(6415):73–75. doi: 10.1038/362073a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hill T. L., Chen Y. Phase changes at the end of a microtubule with a GTP cap. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(18):5772–5776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.18.5772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang T. G., Suhan J., Hackney D. D. Drosophila kinesin motor domain extending to amino acid position 392 is dimeric when expressed in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jun 10;269(23):16502–16507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kamimura S., Kamiya R. High-frequency vibration in flagellar axonemes with amplitudes reflecting the size of tubulin. J Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;116(6):1443–1454. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.6.1443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kamimura S., Mandelkow E. Tubulin protofilaments and kinesin-dependent motility. J Cell Biol. 1992 Aug;118(4):865–875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.4.865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kosik K. S., Orecchio L. D., Schnapp B., Inouye H., Neve R. L. The primary structure and analysis of the squid kinesin heavy chain. J Biol Chem. 1990 Feb 25;265(6):3278–3283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuznetsov S. A., Vaisberg Y. A., Rothwell S. W., Murphy D. B., Gelfand V. I. Isolation of a 45-kDa fragment from the kinesin heavy chain with enhanced ATPase and microtubule-binding activities. J Biol Chem. 1989 Jan 5;264(1):589–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Linck R. W., Langevin G. L. Reassembly of flagellar B (alpha beta) tubulin into singlet microtubules: consequences for cytoplasmic microtubule structure and assembly. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):323–337. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Linck R. W., Olson G. E., Langevin G. L. Arrangement of tubulin subunits and microtubule-associated proteins in the central-pair microtubule apparatus of squid (Loligo pealei) sperm flagella. J Cell Biol. 1981 May;89(2):309–322. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.2.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mandelkow E. M., Mandelkow E. Junctions between microtubule walls. J Mol Biol. 1979 Mar 25;129(1):135–148. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(79)90064-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mandelkow E. M., Mandelkow E., Unwin N., Cohen C. Tubulin hoops. Nature. 1977 Feb 17;265(5595):655–657. doi: 10.1038/265655a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mandelkow E. M., Schultheiss R., Rapp R., Müller M., Mandelkow E. On the surface lattice of microtubules: helix starts, protofilament number, seam, and handedness. J Cell Biol. 1986 Mar;102(3):1067–1073. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.3.1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. McEwen B., Edelstein S. J. Evidence for a mixed lattice in microtubules reassembled in vitro. J Mol Biol. 1980 May 15;139(2):123–145. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90300-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mitchison T. J. Localization of an exchangeable GTP binding site at the plus end of microtubules. Science. 1993 Aug 20;261(5124):1044–1047. doi: 10.1126/science.8102497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Murray J. M. Structure of flagellar microtubules. Int Rev Cytol. 1991;125:47–93. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61216-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oakley B. R. Gamma-tubulin: the microtubule organizer? Trends Cell Biol. 1992 Jan;2(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(92)90125-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ray S., Meyhöfer E., Milligan R. A., Howard J. Kinesin follows the microtubule's protofilament axis. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;121(5):1083–1093. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.5.1083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Scheele R. B., Bergen L. G., Borisy G. G. Control of the structural fidelity of microtubules by initiation sites. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jan 25;154(3):485–500. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(82)80008-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Scholey J. M., Heuser J., Yang J. T., Goldstein L. S. Identification of globular mechanochemical heads of kinesin. Nature. 1989 Mar 23;338(6213):355–357. doi: 10.1038/338355a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Song Y. H., Mandelkow E. Recombinant kinesin motor domain binds to beta-tubulin and decorates microtubules with a B surface lattice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Mar 1;90(5):1671–1675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Steffen W., Linck R. W. Evidence for tektins in centrioles and axonemal microtubules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Apr;85(8):2643–2647. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Svoboda K., Schmidt C. F., Schnapp B. J., Block S. M. Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry. Nature. 1993 Oct 21;365(6448):721–727. doi: 10.1038/365721a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vale R. D., Reese T. S., Sheetz M. P. Identification of a novel force-generating protein, kinesin, involved in microtubule-based motility. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):39–50. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80099-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wade R. H., Chrétien D. Cryoelectron microscopy of microtubules. J Struct Biol. 1993 Jan-Feb;110(1):1–27. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1993.1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Walker R. A., Sheetz M. P. Cytoplasmic microtubule-associated motors. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:429–451. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.002241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Witman G. B. Axonemal dyneins. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992 Feb;4(1):74–79. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(92)90061-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yang J. T., Laymon R. A., Goldstein L. S. A three-domain structure of kinesin heavy chain revealed by DNA sequence and microtubule binding analyses. Cell. 1989 Mar 10;56(5):879–889. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90692-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES