Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1995 Jun 1;129(5):1287–1300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.5.1287

The impact of chromosomes and centrosomes on spindle assembly as observed in living cells

PMCID: PMC2120459  PMID: 7775575

Abstract

We analyzed the role that chromosomes, kinetochores, and centrosomes play in spindle assembly in living grasshopper spermatocytes by reconstructing spindles lacking certain components. We used video- enhanced, polarization microscopy to distinguish the effect of each component on spindle microtubule dynamics and we discovered that both chromosomes and centrosomes make potent and very different contributions to the organization of the spindle. Remarkably, the position of a single chromosome can markedly affect the distribution of microtubules within a spindle or even alter the fate of spindle assembly. In an experimentally constructed spindle having only one chromosome, moving the chromosome to one of the two poles induces a dramatic assembly of microtubules at the nearer pole and a concomitant disassembly at the farther pole. So long as a spindle carries a single chromosome it will persist normally. A spindle will also persist even when all chromosomes are detached and then removed from the cell. If, however, a single chromosome remains in the cell but is detached from the spindle and kept in the cytoplasm, the spindle disassembles. One might expect the effect of chromosomes on spindle assembly to relate to a property of a specific site on each chromosome, perhaps the kinetochore. We have ruled out that possibility by showing that it is the size of chromosomes rather than the number of kinetochores that matters. Although chromosomes affect spindle assembly, they cannot organize a spindle in the absence of centrosomes. In contrast, centrosomes can organize a functional bipolar spindle in the absence of chromosomes. If both centrosomes and chromosomes are removed from the cell, the spindle quickly disappears.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer J., Solomon F. Deconstructing the microtubule-organizing center. Cell. 1994 Feb 25;76(4):589–591. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90496-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bajer A. S. Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis. J Cell Biol. 1982 Apr;93(1):33–48. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brinkley B. R., Cox S. M., Pepper D. A., Wible L., Brenner S. L., Pardue R. L. Tubulin assembly sites and the organization of cytoplasmic microtubules in cultured mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 Sep;90(3):554–562. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.3.554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Casal J., González C., Ripoll P. Spindles and centrosomes during male meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Eur J Cell Biol. 1990 Feb;51(1):38–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Church K., Nicklas R. B., Lin H. P. Micromanipulated bivalents can trigger mini-spindle formation in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocyte cytoplasm. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 2):2765–2773. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayden J. H., Bowser S. S., Rieder C. L. Kinetochores capture astral microtubules during chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle: direct visualization in live newt lung cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Sep;111(3):1039–1045. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.3.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hepler P. K., Jackson W. T. Microtubules and early stages of cell-plate formation in the endosperm of Haemanthus katherinae Baker. J Cell Biol. 1968 Aug;38(2):437–446. doi: 10.1083/jcb.38.2.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules. The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):259–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kalt A., Schliwa M. Molecular components of the centrosome. Trends Cell Biol. 1993 Apr;3(4):118–128. doi: 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90174-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karsenti E., Newport J., Hubble R., Kirschner M. Interconversion of metaphase and interphase microtubule arrays, as studied by the injection of centrosomes and nuclei into Xenopus eggs. J Cell Biol. 1984 May;98(5):1730–1745. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.5.1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kiehart D. P. Microinjection of echinoderm eggs: apparatus and procedures. Methods Cell Biol. 1982;25(Pt B):13–31. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61418-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirschner M., Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell. 1986 May 9;45(3):329–342. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90318-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maro B., Howlett S. K., Webb M. Non-spindle microtubule organizing centers in metaphase II-arrested mouse oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1985 Nov;101(5 Pt 1):1665–1672. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.5.1665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Masuda H., McDonald K. L., Cande W. Z. The mechanism of anaphase spindle elongation: uncoupling of tubulin incorporation and microtubule sliding during in vitro spindle reactivation. J Cell Biol. 1988 Aug;107(2):623–633. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.2.623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mazia D., Paweletz N., Sluder G., Finze E. M. Cooperation of kinetochores and pole in the establishment of monopolar mitotic apparatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jan;78(1):377–381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.1.377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McIntosh J. R., McDonald K. L., Edwards M. K., Ross B. M. Three-dimensional structure of the central mitotic spindle of Diatoma vulgare. J Cell Biol. 1979 Nov;83(2 Pt 1):428–442. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.2.428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Messinger S. M., Albertini D. F. Centrosome and microtubule dynamics during meiotic progression in the mouse oocyte. J Cell Sci. 1991 Oct;100(Pt 2):289–298. doi: 10.1242/jcs.100.2.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. W. Properties of the kinetochore in vitro. II. Microtubule capture and ATP-dependent translocation. J Cell Biol. 1985 Sep;101(3):766–777. doi: 10.1083/jcb.101.3.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitchison T., Evans L., Schulze E., Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. 1986 May 23;45(4):515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90283-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Moens P. B. Kinetochore microtubule numbers of different sized chromosomes. J Cell Biol. 1979 Dec;83(3):556–561. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.3.556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Molè-Bajer J. Fine structural studies of apolar mitosis. Chromosoma. 1969;26(4):427–448. doi: 10.1007/BF00326354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nicklas R. B., Gordon G. W. The total length of spindle microtubules depends on the number of chromosomes present. J Cell Biol. 1985 Jan;100(1):1–7. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nicklas R. B., Krawitz L. E., Ward S. C. Odd chromosome movement and inaccurate chromosome distribution in mitosis and meiosis after treatment with protein kinase inhibitors. J Cell Sci. 1993 Apr;104(Pt 4):961–973. doi: 10.1242/jcs.104.4.961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nicklas R. B., Kubai D. F. Microtubules, chromosome movement, and reorientation after chromosomes are detached from the spindle by micromanipulation. Chromosoma. 1985;92(4):313–324. doi: 10.1007/BF00329815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nicklas R. B. Mitosis. Adv Cell Biol. 1971;2:225–297. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9588-5_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nicklas R. B., Ward S. C. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J Cell Biol. 1994 Sep;126(5):1241–1253. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.5.1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Oakley B. R., Oakley C. E., Yoon Y., Jung M. K. Gamma-tubulin is a component of the spindle pole body that is essential for microtubule function in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell. 1990 Jun 29;61(7):1289–1301. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90693-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pickett-Heaps J. D., Tippit D. H., Porter K. R. Rethinking mitosis. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):729–744. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90435-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rieder C. L., Alexander S. P. Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;110(1):81–95. doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Roos U. P. Light and electron microscopy of rat kangaroo cells in mitosis. I. Formation and breakdown of the mitotic apparatus. Chromosoma. 1973;40(1):43–82. doi: 10.1007/BF00319836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Salmon E. D., Leslie R. J., Saxton W. M., Karow M. L., McIntosh J. R. Spindle microtubule dynamics in sea urchin embryos: analysis using a fluorescein-labeled tubulin and measurements of fluorescence redistribution after laser photobleaching. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2165–2174. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Salmon E. D., McKeel M., Hays T. Rapid rate of tubulin dissociation from microtubules in the mitotic spindle in vivo measured by blocking polymerization with colchicine. J Cell Biol. 1984 Sep;99(3):1066–1075. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.3.1066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sawada T., Schatten G. Microtubules in ascidian eggs during meiosis, fertilization, and mitosis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1988;9(3):219–230. doi: 10.1002/cm.970090304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sawin K. E., Mitchison T. J. Mitotic spindle assembly by two different pathways in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;112(5):925–940. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.5.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Saxton W. M., McIntosh J. R. Interzone microtubule behavior in late anaphase and telophase spindles. J Cell Biol. 1987 Aug;105(2):875–886. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.2.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Saxton W. M., Stemple D. L., Leslie R. J., Salmon E. D., Zavortink M., McIntosh J. R. Tubulin dynamics in cultured mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 1984 Dec;99(6):2175–2186. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.6.2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sluder G., Miller F. J., Rieder C. L. The reproduction of centrosomes: nuclear versus cytoplasmic controls. J Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;103(5):1873–1881. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.5.1873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sluder G., Rieder C. L. Experimental separation of pronuclei in fertilized sea urchin eggs: chromosomes do not organize a spindle in the absence of centrosomes. J Cell Biol. 1985 Mar;100(3):897–903. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.3.897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stearns T., Kirschner M. In vitro reconstitution of centrosome assembly and function: the central role of gamma-tubulin. Cell. 1994 Feb 25;76(4):623–637. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90503-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Steffen W., Fuge H., Dietz R., Bastmeyer M., Müller G. Aster-free spindle poles in insect spermatocytes: evidence for chromosome-induced spindle formation? J Cell Biol. 1986 May;102(5):1679–1687. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.5.1679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Theurkauf W. E., Hawley R. S. Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein. J Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;116(5):1167–1180. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.5.1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wadsworth P. Mitosis: spindle assembly and chromosome motion. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;5(1):123–128. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(05)80017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yeo J. P., Alderuccio F., Toh B. H. A new chromosomal protein essential for mitotic spindle assembly. Nature. 1994 Jan 20;367(6460):288–291. doi: 10.1038/367288a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yeo J. P., Forer A., Toh B. H. A homologue of the human regulator of mitotic spindle assembly protein (RMSA-1) is present in crane fly and is associated with meiotic chromosomes. J Cell Sci. 1994 Jul;107(Pt 7):1845–1851. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.7.1845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zheng Y., Jung M. K., Oakley B. R. Gamma-tubulin is present in Drosophila melanogaster and Homo sapiens and is associated with the centrosome. Cell. 1991 May 31;65(5):817–823. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90389-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES