Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1995 Jul 1;130(1):29–39. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.1.29

Functional characterization of the 180-kD ribosome receptor in vivo

PMCID: PMC2120505  PMID: 7790375

Abstract

A cDNA encoding the 180-kD canine ribosome receptor (RRp) was cloned and sequenced. The deduced primary structure indicates three distinct domains: an NH2-terminal stretch of 28 uncharged amino acids representing the membrane anchor, a basic region (pI = 10.74) comprising the remainder of the NH2-terminal half and an acidic COOH- terminal half (pI = 4.99). The most striking feature of the amino acid sequence is a 10-amino acid consensus motif, NQGKKAEGAP, repeated 54 times in tandem without interruption in the NH2-terminal positively charged region. We postulate that this repeated sequence represents a ribosome binding domain which mediates the interaction between the ribosome and the ER membrane. To substantiate this hypothesis, recombinant full-length ribosome receptor and two truncated versions of this protein, one lacking the potential ribosome binding domain, and one lacking the COOH terminus, were expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Morphological and biochemical analyses showed all proteins were targeted to, and oriented correctly in the ER membrane. In vitro ribosome binding assays demonstrated that yeast microsomes containing the full-length canine receptor or one lacking the COOH-terminal domain were able to bind two to four times as many human ribosomes as control membranes lacking a recombinant protein or microsomes containing a receptor lacking the NH2-terminal basic domain. Electron micrographs of these cells revealed that the expression of all receptor constructs led to a proliferation of perinuclear ER membranes known as "karmellae." Strikingly, in those strains which expressed cDNAs encoding a receptor containing the putative ribosome binding domain, the induced ER membranes (examined in situ) were richly studded with ribosomes. In contrast, karmellae resulting from the expression of receptor cDNA lacking the putative ribosome binding domain were uniformly smooth and free of ribosomes. Cell fractionation and biochemical analyses corroborated the morphological characterization. Taken together these data provide further evidence that RRp functions as a ribosome receptor in vitro, provide new evidence indicating its functionality in vivo, and in both cases indicate that the NH2-terminal basic domain is essential for ribosome binding.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Pringle J. R. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):934–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adelman M. R., Sabatini D. D., Blobel G. Ribosome-membrane interaction. Nondestructive disassembly of rat liver rough microsomes into ribosomal and membranous components. J Cell Biol. 1973 Jan;56(1):206–229. doi: 10.1083/jcb.56.1.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews D. W., Lauffer L., Walter P., Lingappa V. R. Evidence for a two-step mechanism involved in assembly of functional signal recognition particle receptor. J Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;108(3):797–810. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.3.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldari C., Cesareni G. Plasmids pEMBLY: new single-stranded shuttle vectors for the recovery and analysis of yeast DNA sequences. Gene. 1985;35(1-2):27–32. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borgese N., Mok W., Kreibich G., Sabatini D. D. Ribosomal-membrane interaction: in vitro binding of ribosomes to microsomal membranes. J Mol Biol. 1974 Sep 25;88(3):559–580. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90408-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown J. D., Hann B. C., Medzihradszky K. F., Niwa M., Burlingame A. L., Walter P. Subunits of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae signal recognition particle required for its functional expression. EMBO J. 1994 Sep 15;13(18):4390–4400. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06759.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark S. W., Meyer D. I. Centractin is an actin homologue associated with the centrosome. Nature. 1992 Sep 17;359(6392):246–250. doi: 10.1038/359246a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen S. N., Chang A. C., Hsu L. Nonchromosomal antibiotic resistance in bacteria: genetic transformation of Escherichia coli by R-factor DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Aug;69(8):2110–2114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.8.2110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Collins P. G., Gilmore R. Ribosome binding to the endoplasmic reticulum: a 180-kD protein identified by crosslinking to membrane-bound ribosomes is not required for ribosome binding activity. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(4):639–649. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Connolly T., Gilmore R. Formation of a functional ribosome-membrane junction during translocation requires the participation of a GTP-binding protein. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 1):2253–2261. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dobberstein B. Protein transport. On the beaten pathway. Nature. 1994 Feb 17;367(6464):599–600. doi: 10.1038/367599a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. FLECK A., MUNRO H. N. The precision of ultraviolet absorption measurements in the Schmidt-Thannhauser procedure for nucleic acid estimation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1962 May 14;55:571–583. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(62)90836-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FOLCH J., LEES M., SLOANE STANLEY G. H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957 May;226(1):497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feldheim D., Rothblatt J., Schekman R. Topology and functional domains of Sec63p, an endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein required for secretory protein translocation. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jul;12(7):3288–3296. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.3288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fujiki Y., Hubbard A. L., Fowler S., Lazarow P. B. Isolation of intracellular membranes by means of sodium carbonate treatment: application to endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol. 1982 Apr;93(1):97–102. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.1.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilmore R., Walter P., Blobel G. Protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum. II. Isolation and characterization of the signal recognition particle receptor. J Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;95(2 Pt 1):470–477. doi: 10.1083/jcb.95.2.470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Görlich D., Prehn S., Hartmann E., Kalies K. U., Rapoport T. A. A mammalian homolog of SEC61p and SECYp is associated with ribosomes and nascent polypeptides during translocation. Cell. 1992 Oct 30;71(3):489–503. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90517-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hamilton M. G., Pavlovec A., Petermann M. L. Molecular weight, buoyant density, and composition of active subunits of rat liver ribosomes. Biochemistry. 1971 Aug 31;10(18):3424–3427. doi: 10.1021/bi00794a017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hann B. C., Stirling C. J., Walter P. SEC65 gene product is a subunit of the yeast signal recognition particle required for its integrity. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):532–533. doi: 10.1038/356532a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Herz J., Flint N., Stanley K., Frank R., Dobberstein B. The 68 kDa protein of signal recognition particle contains a glycine-rich region also found in certain RNA-binding proteins. FEBS Lett. 1990 Dec 10;276(1-2):103–107. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80518-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hortsch M., Avossa D., Meyer D. I. Characterization of secretory protein translocation: ribosome-membrane interaction in endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol. 1986 Jul;103(1):241–253. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.1.241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hortsch M., Labeit S., Meyer D. I. Complete cDNA sequence coding for human docking protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jan 11;16(1):361–362. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.1.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hortsch M., Meyer D. I. The human docking protein does not associate with the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum via a signal or insertion sequence-mediated mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988 Jan 15;150(1):111–117. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(88)90493-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ichimura T., Ohsumi T., Shindo Y., Ohwada T., Yagame H., Momose Y., Omata S., Sugano H. Isolation and some properties of a 34-kDa-membrane protein that may be responsible for ribosome binding in rat liver rough microsomes. FEBS Lett. 1992 Jan 13;296(1):7–10. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80391-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ichimura T., Shindo Y., Uda Y., Ohsumi T., Omata S., Sugano H. Anti-(p34 protein) antibodies inhibit ribosome binding to and protein translocation across the rough microsomal membrane. FEBS Lett. 1993 Jul 12;326(1-3):241–245. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81799-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jackson M. R., Nilsson T., Peterson P. A. Identification of a consensus motif for retention of transmembrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 1990 Oct;9(10):3153–3162. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07513.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kalies K. U., Görlich D., Rapoport T. A. Binding of ribosomes to the rough endoplasmic reticulum mediated by the Sec61p-complex. J Cell Biol. 1994 Aug;126(4):925–934. doi: 10.1083/jcb.126.4.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kreibich G., Marcantonio E. E., Sabatini D. D. Ribophorins I and II: membrane proteins characteristic of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Methods Enzymol. 1983;96:520–530. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(83)96045-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lauffer L., Garcia P. D., Harkins R. N., Coussens L., Ullrich A., Walter P. Topology of signal recognition particle receptor in endoplasmic reticulum membrane. 1985 Nov 28-Dec 4Nature. 318(6044):334–338. doi: 10.1038/318334a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mellor J., Dobson M. J., Roberts N. A., Tuite M. F., Emtage J. S., White S., Lowe P. A., Patel T., Kingsman A. J., Kingsman S. M. Efficient synthesis of enzymatically active calf chymosin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1983 Sep;24(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90126-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mothes W., Prehn S., Rapoport T. A. Systematic probing of the environment of a translocating secretory protein during translocation through the ER membrane. EMBO J. 1994 Sep 1;13(17):3973–3982. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06713.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nicchitta C. V., Blobel G. Assembly of translocation-competent proteoliposomes from detergent-solubilized rough microsomes. Cell. 1990 Jan 26;60(2):259–269. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90741-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nicchitta C. V., Migliaccio G., Blobel G. Biochemical fractionation and assembly of the membrane components that mediate nascent chain targeting and translocation. Cell. 1991 May 17;65(4):587–598. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90091-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Novick P., Field C., Schekman R. Identification of 23 complementation groups required for post-translational events in the yeast secretory pathway. Cell. 1980 Aug;21(1):205–215. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90128-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ogg S. C., Poritz M. A., Walter P. Signal recognition particle receptor is important for cell growth and protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 1992 Aug;3(8):895–911. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.8.895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ohsumi T., Ichimura T., Sugano H., Omata S., Isobe T., Kuwano R. Ribosome-binding protein p34 is a member of the leucine-rich-repeat-protein superfamily. Biochem J. 1993 Sep 1;294(Pt 2):465–472. doi: 10.1042/bj2940465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Palade G. Intracellular aspects of the process of protein synthesis. Science. 1975 Aug 1;189(4200):347–358. doi: 10.1126/science.1096303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Payne G. S., Hasson T. B., Hasson M. S., Schekman R. Genetic and biochemical characterization of clathrin-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;7(11):3888–3898. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.11.3888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rose M. D., Misra L. M., Vogel J. P. KAR2, a karyogamy gene, is the yeast homolog of the mammalian BiP/GRP78 gene. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1211–1221. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90058-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanders S. L., Whitfield K. M., Vogel J. P., Rose M. D., Schekman R. W. Sec61p and BiP directly facilitate polypeptide translocation into the ER. Cell. 1992 Apr 17;69(2):353–365. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90415-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sanderson C. M., Crowe J. S., Meyer D. I. Protein retention in yeast rough endoplasmic reticulum: expression and assembly of human ribophorin I. J Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;111(6 Pt 2):2861–2870. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.6.2861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sanderson C. M., Meyer D. I. Purification and functional characterization of membranes derived from the rough endoplasmic reticulum of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jul 15;266(20):13423–13430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Savitz A. J., Meyer D. I. 180-kD ribosome receptor is essential for both ribosome binding and protein translocation. J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(4):853–863. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.4.853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Savitz A. J., Meyer D. I. Identification of a ribosome receptor in the rough endoplasmic reticulum. Nature. 1990 Aug 9;346(6284):540–544. doi: 10.1038/346540a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schutze M. P., Peterson P. A., Jackson M. R. An N-terminal double-arginine motif maintains type II membrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 1994 Apr 1;13(7):1696–1705. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06434.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Singer S. J., Maher P. A., Yaffe M. P. On the transfer of integral proteins into membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(7):1960–1964. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.7.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Stirling C. J., Hewitt E. W. The S. cerevisiae SEC65 gene encodes a component of yeast signal recognition particle with homology to human SRP19. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):534–537. doi: 10.1038/356534a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Stirling C. J., Rothblatt J., Hosobuchi M., Deshaies R., Schekman R. Protein translocation mutants defective in the insertion of integral membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell. 1992 Feb;3(2):129–142. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tazawa S., Unuma M., Tondokoro N., Asano Y., Ohsumi T., Ichimura T., Sugano H. Identification of a membrane protein responsible for ribosome binding in rough microsomal membranes. J Biochem. 1991 Jan;109(1):89–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Towbin H., Staehelin T., Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Sep;76(9):4350–4354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Walter P., Ibrahimi I., Blobel G. Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum. I. Signal recognition protein (SRP) binds to in-vitro-assembled polysomes synthesizing secretory protein. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):545–550. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wilsbach K., Payne G. S. Vps1p, a member of the dynamin GTPase family, is necessary for Golgi membrane protein retention in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1993 Aug;12(8):3049–3059. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05974.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wright R., Basson M., D'Ari L., Rine J. Increased amounts of HMG-CoA reductase induce "karmellae": a proliferation of stacked membrane pairs surrounding the yeast nucleus. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jul;107(1):101–114. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.1.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES