Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1995 Dec 2;131(6):1365–1376. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.6.1365

Chromatin conformation and salt-induced compaction: three-dimensional structural information from cryoelectron microscopy

PMCID: PMC2120675  PMID: 8522597

Abstract

Cryoelectron microscopy has been used to examine the three-dimensional (3-D) conformation of small oligonucleosomes from chicken erythrocyte nuclei after vitrification in solutions of differing ionic strength. From tilt pairs of micrographs, the 3-D location and orientation of the nucleosomal disks, and the paths of segments of exposed linker can be obtained. In "low-salt" conditions (5 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5), the average trinucleosome assumes the shape of an equilateral triangle, with nucleosomes at the vertices, and a length of exposed linker DNA between consecutive nucleosomes equivalent to approximately 46 bp. The two linker DNA segments converge at the central nucleosome. Removal of histones H1 and H5 results in a much more variable trinucleosome morphology, and the two linker DNA segments usually join the central nucleosome at different locations. Trinucleosomes vitrified in 20 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, (the salt concentration producing the maximal increase in sedimentation), reveal that compaction occurs by a reduction in the included angle made by the linker DNA segments at the central nucleosome, and does not involve a reduction in the distance between consecutive nucleosomes. Frequently, there is also a change in morphology at the linker entry-exit site. At 40 mM NaCl, there is no further change in trinucleosome morphology, but polynucleosomes are appreciably more compact. Nevertheless, the 3-D zig-zag conformation observed in polynucleosomes at low salt is retained at 40 mM NaCl, and individual nucleosome disks remain separated from each other. There is no evidence for the formation of solenoidal arrangements within polynucleosomes. Comparison of the solution conformation of individual oligonucleosomes with data from physical measurements on bulk chromatin samples suggests that the latter should be reinterpreted. The new data support the concept of an irregular zig-zag chromatin conformation in solution over a range of ionic strengths, in agreement with other in situ (McDowall, A.W., J.M. Smith, and J. Dubochet. 1986, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J.5: 1395-1402; Horowitz, R.A., D.A. Agard, J.W. Sedat, and C.L. Woodcock, 1994. J. Cell Biol. 125:1-10), and in vitro conclusions (van Holde, K., and J. Zlatanova. 1995. J. Biol. Chem. 270:8373-8376). Cryoelectron microscopy also provides a way to determine the 3-D conformation of naturally occurring chromatins in which precise nucleosome positioning plays a role in transcriptional regulation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian M., Dubochet J., Lepault J., McDowall A. W. Cryo-electron microscopy of viruses. Nature. 1984 Mar 1;308(5954):32–36. doi: 10.1038/308032a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan J., Harborne N., Rau D. C., Gould H. Participation of core histone "tails" in the stabilization of the chromatin solenoid. J Cell Biol. 1982 May;93(2):285–297. doi: 10.1083/jcb.93.2.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Allan J., Hartman P. G., Crane-Robinson C., Aviles F. X. The structure of histone H1 and its location in chromatin. Nature. 1980 Dec 25;288(5792):675–679. doi: 10.1038/288675a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allan J., Mitchell T., Harborne N., Bohm L., Crane-Robinson C. Roles of H1 domains in determining higher order chromatin structure and H1 location. J Mol Biol. 1986 Feb 20;187(4):591–601. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90337-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arents G., Burlingame R. W., Wang B. C., Love W. E., Moudrianakis E. N. The nucleosomal core histone octamer at 3.1 A resolution: a tripartite protein assembly and a left-handed superhelix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 15;88(22):10148–10152. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.22.10148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates D. L., Butler P. J., Pearson E. C., Thomas J. O. Stability of the higher-order structure of chicken-erythrocyte chromatin in solution. Eur J Biochem. 1981 Oct;119(3):469–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05631.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bates D. L., Thomas J. O. Histones H1 and H5: one or two molecules per nucleosome? Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Nov 25;9(22):5883–5894. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.22.5883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bavykin S. G., Usachenko S. I., Zalensky A. O., Mirzabekov A. D. Structure of nucleosomes and organization of internucleosomal DNA in chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1990 Apr 5;212(3):495–511. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90328-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bednar J., Furrer P., Stasiak A., Dubochet J., Egelman E. H., Bates A. D. The twist, writhe and overall shape of supercoiled DNA change during counterion-induced transition from a loosely to a tightly interwound superhelix. Possible implications for DNA structure in vivo. J Mol Biol. 1994 Jan 21;235(3):825–847. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bellare J. R., Davis H. T., Scriven L. E., Talmon Y. Controlled environment vitrification system: an improved sample preparation technique. J Electron Microsc Tech. 1988 Sep;10(1):87–111. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1060100111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Beorchia A., Ploton D., Menager M., Lebonvallet S., Thiry M., Bonnet N. Digital three-dimensional visualization of cellular organelles studied by medium- and high-voltage electron microscopy. J Microsc. 1991 Aug;163(Pt 2):221–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Butler P. J. A defined structure of the 30 nm chromatin fibre which accommodates different nucleosomal repeat lengths. EMBO J. 1984 Nov;3(11):2599–2604. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02180.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Butler P. J., Thomas J. O. Changes in chromatin folding in solution. J Mol Biol. 1980 Jul 15;140(4):505–529. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90268-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Caron F., Thomas J. O. Exchange of histone H1 between segments of chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1981 Mar 15;146(4):513–537. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Clark D. J., Kimura T. Electrostatic mechanism of chromatin folding. J Mol Biol. 1990 Feb 20;211(4):883–896. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90081-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cyrklaff M., Adrian M., Dubochet J. Evaporation during preparation of unsupported thin vitrified aqueous layers for cryo-electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc Tech. 1990 Dec;16(4):351–355. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1060160407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dubochet J., Adrian M., Chang J. J., Homo J. C., Lepault J., McDowall A. W., Schultz P. Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Q Rev Biophys. 1988 May;21(2):129–228. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500004297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dubochet J., Adrian M., Dustin I., Furrer P., Stasiak A. Cryoelectron microscopy of DNA molecules in solution. Methods Enzymol. 1992;211:507–518. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)11028-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dustin I., Furrer P., Stasiak A., Dubochet J., Langowski J., Egelman E. Spatial visualization of DNA in solution. J Struct Biol. 1991 Aug;107(1):15–21. doi: 10.1016/1047-8477(91)90026-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Felsenfeld G. Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism. Nature. 1992 Jan 16;355(6357):219–224. doi: 10.1038/355219a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Felsenfeld G., McGhee J. D. Structure of the 30 nm chromatin fiber. Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):375–377. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90456-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Furrer P., Bednar J., Dubochet J., Hamiche A., Prunell A. DNA at the entry-exit of the nucleosome observed by cryoelectron microscopy. J Struct Biol. 1995 May-Jun;114(3):177–183. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1995.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Garcia-Ramirez M., Dong F., Ausio J. Role of the histone "tails" in the folding of oligonucleosomes depleted of histone H1. J Biol Chem. 1992 Sep 25;267(27):19587–19595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Giannasca P. J., Horowitz R. A., Woodcock C. L. Transitions between in situ and isolated chromatin. J Cell Sci. 1993 Jun;105(Pt 2):551–561. doi: 10.1242/jcs.105.2.551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hansen J. C., Ausio J., Stanik V. H., van Holde K. E. Homogeneous reconstituted oligonucleosomes, evidence for salt-dependent folding in the absence of histone H1. Biochemistry. 1989 Nov 14;28(23):9129–9136. doi: 10.1021/bi00449a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hayes J. J., Wolffe A. P. Preferential and asymmetric interaction of linker histones with 5S DNA in the nucleosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 15;90(14):6415–6419. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.14.6415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Horowitz R. A., Agard D. A., Sedat J. W., Woodcock C. L. The three-dimensional architecture of chromatin in situ: electron tomography reveals fibers composed of a continuously variable zig-zag nucleosomal ribbon. J Cell Biol. 1994 Apr;125(1):1–10. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Horowitz R. A., Giannasca P. J., Woodcock C. L. Ultrastructural preservation of nuclei and chromatin: improvement with low-temperature methods. J Microsc. 1990 Feb;157(Pt 2):205–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb02959.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lennard A. C., Thomas J. O. The arrangement of H5 molecules in extended and condensed chicken erythrocyte chromatin. EMBO J. 1985 Dec 16;4(13A):3455–3462. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb04104.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leuba S. H., Yang G., Robert C., Samori B., van Holde K., Zlatanova J., Bustamante C. Three-dimensional structure of extended chromatin fibers as revealed by tapping-mode scanning force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Nov 22;91(24):11621–11625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Losa R., Thoma F., Koller T. Involvement of the globular domain of histone H1 in the higher order structures of chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1984 Jun 5;175(4):529–551. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90183-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Marion C., Bezot P., Hesse-Bezot C., Roux B., Bernengo J. C. Conformation of chromatin oligomers. A new argument for a change with the hexanucleosome. Eur J Biochem. 1981 Nov;120(1):169–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb05685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pennings S., Meersseman G., Bradbury E. M. Linker histones H1 and H5 prevent the mobility of positioned nucleosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 25;91(22):10275–10279. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.22.10275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Pennings S., Meersseman G., Bradbury E. M. Mobility of positioned nucleosomes on 5 S rDNA. J Mol Biol. 1991 Jul 5;220(1):101–110. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90384-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Prunell A., Kornberg R. D. Variable center to center distance of nucleosomes in chromatin. J Mol Biol. 1982 Jan 25;154(3):515–523. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(82)80010-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rattner J. B., Hamkalo B. A. Higher order structure in metaphase chromosomes. II. The relationship between the 250 A fiber, superbeads and beads-on-a-string. Chromosoma. 1978 Dec 6;69(3):373–379. doi: 10.1007/BF00332140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Richmond T. J., Finch J. T., Rushton B., Rhodes D., Klug A. Structure of the nucleosome core particle at 7 A resolution. Nature. 1984 Oct 11;311(5986):532–537. doi: 10.1038/311532a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Simpson R. T. Structure of the chromatosome, a chromatin particle containing 160 base pairs of DNA and all the histones. Biochemistry. 1978 Dec 12;17(25):5524–5531. doi: 10.1021/bi00618a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Simpson R. T., Thoma F., Brubaker J. M. Chromatin reconstituted from tandemly repeated cloned DNA fragments and core histones: a model system for study of higher order structure. Cell. 1985 Oct;42(3):799–808. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90276-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Stewart M., Vigers G. Electron microscopy of frozen-hydrated biological material. Nature. 1986 Feb 20;319(6055):631–636. doi: 10.1038/319631a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Thoma F., Koller T. Influence of histone H1 on chromatin structure. Cell. 1977 Sep;12(1):101–107. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90188-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Thoma F., Koller T., Klug A. Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin. J Cell Biol. 1979 Nov;83(2 Pt 1):403–427. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.2.403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Thoma F., Koller T. Unravelled nucleosomes, nucleosome beads and higher order structures of chromatin: influence of non-histone components and histone H1. J Mol Biol. 1981 Jul 15;149(4):709–733. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90354-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Thomas J. O., Rees C. Exchange of histones H1 and H5 between chromatin fragments. A preference of H5 for higher-order structures. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Jul 15;134(1):109–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1983.tb07538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Todd R. D., Garrard W. T. Overall pathway of mononucleosome production. J Biol Chem. 1979 Apr 25;254(8):3074–3083. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vigers G. P., Crowther R. A., Pearse B. M. Three-dimensional structure of clathrin cages in ice. EMBO J. 1986 Mar;5(3):529–534. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04242.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wade R. H., Chrétien D. Cryoelectron microscopy of microtubules. J Struct Biol. 1993 Jan-Feb;110(1):1–27. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1993.1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Widom J. Physicochemical studies of the folding of the 100 A nucleosome filament into the 300 A filament. Cation dependence. J Mol Biol. 1986 Aug 5;190(3):411–424. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Widom J. Toward a unified model of chromatin folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1989;18:365–395. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.18.060189.002053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Williams S. P., Langmore J. P. Small angle x-ray scattering of chromatin. Radius and mass per unit length depend on linker length. Biophys J. 1991 Mar;59(3):606–618. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82276-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wolffe A. P. Transcription: in tune with the histones. Cell. 1994 Apr 8;77(1):13–16. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90229-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Woodcock C. L. Chromatin fibers observed in situ in frozen hydrated sections. Native fiber diameter is not correlated with nucleosome repeat length. J Cell Biol. 1994 Apr;125(1):11–19. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.1.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Woodcock C. L., Frado L. L., Green G. R., Einck L. Adhesion of particulate specimens to support films for electron microscopy: a model system for assessing the surface properties of support films, and its application to chromatin particles. J Microsc. 1981 Feb;121(Pt 2):211–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1981.tb01214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Woodcock C. L., Frado L. L., Rattner J. B. The higher-order structure of chromatin: evidence for a helical ribbon arrangement. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 1):42–52. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Woodcock C. L., Grigoryev S. A., Horowitz R. A., Whitaker N. A chromatin folding model that incorporates linker variability generates fibers resembling the native structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):9021–9025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.19.9021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Woodcock C. L., Horowitz R. A. Chromatin organization re-viewed. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Jul;5(7):272–277. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yao J., Lowary P. T., Widom J. Direct detection of linker DNA bending in defined-length oligomers of chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Oct;87(19):7603–7607. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.19.7603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yao J., Lowary P. T., Widom J. Linker DNA bending induced by the core histones of chromatin. Biochemistry. 1991 Aug 27;30(34):8408–8414. doi: 10.1021/bi00098a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yao J., Lowary P. T., Widom J. Twist constraints on linker DNA in the 30-nm chromatin fiber: implications for nucleosome phasing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 15;90(20):9364–9368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.20.9364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zivanovic Y., Duband-Goulet I., Schultz P., Stofer E., Oudet P., Prunell A. Chromatin reconstitution on small DNA rings. III. Histone H5 dependence of DNA supercoiling in the nucleosome. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jul 20;214(2):479–495. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90195-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zlatanova J., Leuba S. H., Yang G., Bustamante C., van Holde K. Linker DNA accessibility in chromatin fibers of different conformations: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5277–5280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. van Holde K. Transcription. The omnipotent nucleosome. Nature. 1993 Mar 11;362(6416):111–112. doi: 10.1038/362111a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. van Holde K., Zlatanova J. Chromatin higher order structure: chasing a mirage? J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 14;270(15):8373–8376. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.15.8373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES