Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1996 Apr 1;133(1):125–140. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.1.125

Influence of M-phase chromatin on the anisotropy of microtubule asters

PMCID: PMC2120784  PMID: 8601601

Abstract

In many eukaryotic cells going through M-phase, a bipolar spindle is formed by microtubules nucleated from centrosomes. These microtubules, in addition to being "captured" by kinetochores, may be stabilized by chromatin in two different ways: short-range stabilization effects may affect microtubules in close contact with the chromatin, while long- range stabilization effects may "guide" microtubule growth towards the chromatin (e.g., by introducing a diffusive gradient of an enzymatic activity that affects microtubule assembly). Here, we use both meiotic and mitotic extracts from Xenopus laevis eggs to study microtubule aster formation and microtubule dynamics in the presence of chromatin. In "low-speed" meiotic extracts, in the presence of salmon sperm chromatin, we find that short-range stabilization effects lead to a strong anisotropy of the microtubule asters. Analysis of the dynamic parameters of microtubule growth show that this anisotropy arises from a decrease in the catastrophe frequency, an increase in the rescue frequency and a decrease in the growth velocity. In this system we also find evidence for long-range "guidance" effects, which lead to a weak anisotropy of the asters. Statistically relevant results on these long- range effects are obtained in "high-speed" mitotic extracts in the presence of artificially constructed chromatin stripes. We find that aster anisotropy is biased in the direction of the chromatin and that the catastrophe frequency is reduced in its vicinity. In this system we also find a surprising dependence of the catastrophe and the rescue frequencies on the length of microtubules nucleated from centrosomes: the catastrophe frequency increase and the rescue frequency decreases with microtubule length.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (7.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Belmont L. D., Hyman A. A., Sawin K. E., Mitchison T. J. Real-time visualization of cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in cytoplasmic extracts. Cell. 1990 Aug 10;62(3):579–589. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90022-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chrétien D., Fuller S. D., Karsenti E. Structure of growing microtubule ends: two-dimensional sheets close into tubes at variable rates. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;129(5):1311–1328. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.5.1311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Church K., Nicklas R. B., Lin H. P. Micromanipulated bivalents can trigger mini-spindle formation in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocyte cytoplasm. J Cell Biol. 1986 Dec;103(6 Pt 2):2765–2773. doi: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dogterom M., Maggs A. C., Leibler S. Diffusion and formation of microtubule asters: physical processes versus biochemical regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 18;92(15):6683–6688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Felix M. A., Pines J., Hunt T., Karsenti E. A post-ribosomal supernatant from activated Xenopus eggs that displays post-translationally regulated oscillation of its cdc2+ mitotic kinase activity. EMBO J. 1989 Oct;8(10):3059–3069. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08457.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernandez A., Brautigan D. L., Lamb N. J. Protein phosphatase type 1 in mammalian cell mitosis: chromosomal localization and involvement in mitotic exit. J Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;116(6):1421–1430. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.6.1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Félix M. A., Antony C., Wright M., Maro B. Centrosome assembly in vitro: role of gamma-tubulin recruitment in Xenopus sperm aster formation. J Cell Biol. 1994 Jan;124(1-2):19–31. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gard D. L., Kirschner M. W. Microtubule assembly in cytoplasmic extracts of Xenopus oocytes and eggs. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2191–2201. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glotzer M., Murray A. W., Kirschner M. W. Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway. Nature. 1991 Jan 10;349(6305):132–138. doi: 10.1038/349132a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hirano T., Mitchison T. J. Cell cycle control of higher-order chromatin assembly around naked DNA in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1991 Dec;115(6):1479–1489. doi: 10.1083/jcb.115.6.1479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Holy T. E., Leibler S. Dynamic instability of microtubules as an efficient way to search in space. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5682–5685. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hyman A., Drechsel D., Kellogg D., Salser S., Sawin K., Steffen P., Wordeman L., Mitchison T. Preparation of modified tubulins. Methods Enzymol. 1991;196:478–485. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)96041-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Karsenti E. Mitotic spindle morphogenesis in animal cells. Semin Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;2(4):251–260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Karsenti E., Newport J., Kirschner M. Respective roles of centrosomes and chromatin in the conversion of microtubule arrays from interphase to metaphase. J Cell Biol. 1984 Jul;99(1 Pt 2):47s–54s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.1.47s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirschner M., Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell. 1986 May 9;45(3):329–342. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90318-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lohka M. J., Masui Y. Formation in vitro of sperm pronuclei and mitotic chromosomes induced by amphibian ooplasmic components. Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):719–721. doi: 10.1126/science.6601299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McIntosh J. R., Koonce M. P. Mitosis. Science. 1989 Nov 3;246(4930):622–628. doi: 10.1126/science.2683078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. W. Isolation of mammalian centrosomes. Methods Enzymol. 1986;134:261–268. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(86)34094-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):237–242. doi: 10.1038/312237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Microtubule assembly nucleated by isolated centrosomes. Nature. 1984 Nov 15;312(5991):232–237. doi: 10.1038/312232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Murray A. W. Cell cycle extracts. Methods Cell Biol. 1991;36:581–605. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Odde D. J., Cassimeris L., Buettner H. M. Kinetics of microtubule catastrophe assessed by probabilistic analysis. Biophys J. 1995 Sep;69(3):796–802. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)79953-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pickett-Heaps J. D., Tippit D. H., Porter K. R. Rethinking mitosis. Cell. 1982 Jul;29(3):729–744. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90435-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sawin K. E., Mitchison T. J. Mitotic spindle assembly by two different pathways in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;112(5):925–940. doi: 10.1083/jcb.112.5.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sorger P. K., Severin F. F., Hyman A. A. Factors required for the binding of reassembled yeast kinetochores to microtubules in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1994 Nov;127(4):995–1008. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.4.995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Steffen W., Fuge H., Dietz R., Bastmeyer M., Müller G. Aster-free spindle poles in insect spermatocytes: evidence for chromosome-induced spindle formation? J Cell Biol. 1986 May;102(5):1679–1687. doi: 10.1083/jcb.102.5.1679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Theurkauf W. E., Hawley R. S. Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein. J Cell Biol. 1992 Mar;116(5):1167–1180. doi: 10.1083/jcb.116.5.1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Verde F., Dogterom M., Stelzer E., Karsenti E., Leibler S. Control of microtubule dynamics and length by cyclin A- and cyclin B-dependent kinases in Xenopus egg extracts. J Cell Biol. 1992 Sep;118(5):1097–1108. doi: 10.1083/jcb.118.5.1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Verde F., Labbé J. C., Dorée M., Karsenti E. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by cdc2 protein kinase in cell-free extracts of Xenopus eggs. Nature. 1990 Jan 18;343(6255):233–238. doi: 10.1038/343233a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang D., Nicklas R. B. The impact of chromosomes and centrosomes on spindle assembly as observed in living cells. J Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;129(5):1287–1300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.5.1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zimmermann R. M., Cox E. C. DNA stretching on functionalized gold surfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Feb 11;22(3):492–497. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.3.492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES