Skip to main content
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1996 May 2;133(4):865–878. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.4.865

Yeast src homology region 3 domain-binding proteins involved in bud formation

PMCID: PMC2120841  PMID: 8666671

Abstract

The yeast protein Bem1p, which bears two src homology region 3 (SH3) domains, is involved in cell polarization. A Rho-type GTPase, Rho3p, is involved in the maintenance of cell polarity for bud formation, and the rho3 defect is suppressed by a high dose of BEM1. Mutational analysis revealed that the second SH3 domain from the NH2 terminus (SH3-2) of Bem1p is important for the functions of Bem1p in bud formation and in the suppression of the rho3 defect. Boi2p, which bound to SH3-2 Bem1p, was identified using the two-hybrid system. Boi2p has a proline-rich sequence that is critical for displaying the Boi2p-Bem1p two-hybrid interaction, an SH3 domain in its NH2-terminal half, and a pleckstrin homology domain in its COOH-terminal half. A BOI2 homologue, BOI1, was identified as a gene whose overexpression inhibited cell growth. Cells overexpressing either BOI1 or BOI2 were arrested as large, round, and unbudded cells, indicating that the Boi proteins affect cell polarization. Genetic analysis revealed that BOI1 and BOI2 are functionally redundant and important for cell growth. delta boi1 delta boi2 cells became large round cells or lysed with buds, displaying defects in bud formation and in the maintenance of cell polarity. Analysis using several truncated versions of BOI2 revealed that the COOH-terminal half, which contains the pleckstrin homology domain is essential for the function of Boi2p in cell growth, while the NH2- terminal half is not, and the NH2-terminal half might be required for modulating the function of Bem1p. Overproduction of either Rho3p or the Rho3p-related GTPase Rho4p suppressed the boi defect. These results demonstrate that Rho3p GTPases and Boi proteins function in the maintenance of cell polarity for bud formation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (4.0 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Johnson D. I., Longnecker R. M., Sloat B. F., Pringle J. R. CDC42 and CDC43, two additional genes involved in budding and the establishment of cell polarity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;111(1):131–142. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.1.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams A. E., Pringle J. R. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):934–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbacid M. ras genes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:779–827. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.004023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bender A., Pringle J. R. Multicopy suppression of the cdc24 budding defect in yeast by CDC42 and three newly identified genes including the ras-related gene RSR1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):9976–9980. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.9976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bender A., Pringle J. R. Use of a screen for synthetic lethal and multicopy suppressee mutants to identify two new genes involved in morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;11(3):1295–1305. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.3.1295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boguski M. S., McCormick F. Proteins regulating Ras and its relatives. Nature. 1993 Dec 16;366(6456):643–654. doi: 10.1038/366643a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourne H. R., Sanders D. A., McCormick F. The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism. Nature. 1991 Jan 10;349(6305):117–127. doi: 10.1038/349117a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cabib E., Roberts R., Bowers B. Synthesis of the yeast cell wall and its regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1982;51:763–793. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.003555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chant J., Corrado K., Pringle J. R., Herskowitz I. Yeast BUD5, encoding a putative GDP-GTP exchange factor, is necessary for bud site selection and interacts with bud formation gene BEM1. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1213–1224. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90016-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chenevert J., Corrado K., Bender A., Pringle J., Herskowitz I. A yeast gene (BEM1) necessary for cell polarization whose product contains two SH3 domains. Nature. 1992 Mar 5;356(6364):77–79. doi: 10.1038/356077a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chien C. T., Bartel P. L., Sternglanz R., Fields S. The two-hybrid system: a method to identify and clone genes for proteins that interact with a protein of interest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9578–9582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cicchetti P., Mayer B. J., Thiel G., Baltimore D. Identification of a protein that binds to the SH3 region of Abl and is similar to Bcr and GAP-rho. Science. 1992 Aug 7;257(5071):803–806. doi: 10.1126/science.1379745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drubin D. G. Development of cell polarity in budding yeast. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1093–1096. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90001-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Field C., Schekman R. Localized secretion of acid phosphatase reflects the pattern of cell surface growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jul;86(1):123–128. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fields S., Sternglanz R. The two-hybrid system: an assay for protein-protein interactions. Trends Genet. 1994 Aug;10(8):286–292. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90012-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Harlan J. E., Hajduk P. J., Yoon H. S., Fesik S. W. Pleckstrin homology domains bind to phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate. Nature. 1994 Sep 8;371(6493):168–170. doi: 10.1038/371168a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Imai J., Toh-e A., Matsui Y. Genetic analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RHO3 gene, encoding a rho-type small GTPase, provides evidence for a role in bud formation. Genetics. 1996 Feb;142(2):359–369. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.2.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Irie K., Nomoto S., Miyajima I., Matsumoto K. SGV1 encodes a CDC28/cdc2-related kinase required for a G alpha subunit-mediated adaptive response to pheromone in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1991 May 31;65(5):785–795. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90386-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ito H., Fukuda Y., Murata K., Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983 Jan;153(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson D. I., Pringle J. R. Molecular characterization of CDC42, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene involved in the development of cell polarity. J Cell Biol. 1990 Jul;111(1):143–152. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.1.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kilmartin J. V., Adams A. E. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):922–933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Leeuw T., Fourest-Lieuvin A., Wu C., Chenevert J., Clark K., Whiteway M., Thomas D. Y., Leberer E. Pheromone response in yeast: association of Bem1p with proteins of the MAP kinase cascade and actin. Science. 1995 Nov 17;270(5239):1210–1213. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5239.1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Matsui Y., Toh-E A. Yeast RHO3 and RHO4 ras superfamily genes are necessary for bud growth, and their defect is suppressed by a high dose of bud formation genes CDC42 and BEM1. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Dec;12(12):5690–5699. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.12.5690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matsui Y., Toh-e A. Isolation and characterization of two novel ras superfamily genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1992 May 1;114(1):43–49. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90705-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitchell A. P., Herskowitz I. Activation of meiosis and sporulation by repression of the RME1 product in yeast. 1986 Feb 27-Mar 5Nature. 319(6056):738–742. doi: 10.1038/319738a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Musacchio A., Gibson T., Rice P., Thompson J., Saraste M. The PH domain: a common piece in the structural patchwork of signalling proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993 Sep;18(9):343–348. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90071-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Novick P., Botstein D. Phenotypic analysis of temperature-sensitive yeast actin mutants. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):405–416. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90154-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ohya Y., Goebl M., Goodman L. E., Petersen-Bjørn S., Friesen J. D., Tamanoi F., Anraku Y. Yeast CAL1 is a structural and functional homologue to the DPR1 (RAM) gene involved in ras processing. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jul 5;266(19):12356–12360. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paravicini G., Cooper M., Friedli L., Smith D. J., Carpentier J. L., Klig L. S., Payton M. A. The osmotic integrity of the yeast cell requires a functional PKC1 gene product. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Nov;12(11):4896–4905. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.11.4896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peterson J., Zheng Y., Bender L., Myers A., Cerione R., Bender A. Interactions between the bud emergence proteins Bem1p and Bem2p and Rho-type GTPases in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;127(5):1395–1406. doi: 10.1083/jcb.127.5.1395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pringle J. R., Preston R. A., Adams A. E., Stearns T., Drubin D. G., Haarer B. K., Jones E. W. Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 1989;31:357–435. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61620-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rose A. H. Growth and handling of yeasts. Methods Cell Biol. 1975;12:1–16. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)60948-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rozakis-Adcock M., McGlade J., Mbamalu G., Pelicci G., Daly R., Li W., Batzer A., Thomas S., Brugge J., Pelicci P. G. Association of the Shc and Grb2/Sem5 SH2-containing proteins is implicated in activation of the Ras pathway by tyrosine kinases. Nature. 1992 Dec 17;360(6405):689–692. doi: 10.1038/360689a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Saiki R. K., Gelfand D. H., Stoffel S., Scharf S. J., Higuchi R., Horn G. T., Mullis K. B., Erlich H. A. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science. 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):487–491. doi: 10.1126/science.2448875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sanger F., Nicklen S., Coulson A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5463–5467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shirayama M., Matsui Y., Toh-E A. The yeast TEM1 gene, which encodes a GTP-binding protein, is involved in termination of M phase. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Nov;14(11):7476–7482. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.11.7476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sikorski R. S., Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989 May;122(1):19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sloat B. F., Adams A., Pringle J. R. Roles of the CDC24 gene product in cellular morphogenesis during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jun;89(3):395–405. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.3.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sloat B. F., Pringle J. R. A mutant of yeast defective in cellular morphogenesis. Science. 1978 Jun 9;200(4346):1171–1173. doi: 10.1126/science.349694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sutton A., Immanuel D., Arndt K. T. The SIT4 protein phosphatase functions in late G1 for progression into S phase. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Apr;11(4):2133–2148. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.4.2133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tanaka K., Matsumoto K., Toh-e A. Dual regulation of the expression of the polyubiquitin gene by cyclic AMP and heat shock in yeast. EMBO J. 1988 Feb;7(2):495–502. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02837.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tkacz J. S., Lampen J. O. Wall replication in saccharomyces species: use of fluorescein-conjugated concanavalin A to reveal the site of mannan insertion. J Gen Microbiol. 1972 Sep;72(2):243–247. doi: 10.1099/00221287-72-2-243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yoko-o T., Kato H., Matsui Y., Takenawa T., Toh-e A. Isolation and characterization of temperature-sensitive plc1 mutants of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Apr 20;247(2):148–156. doi: 10.1007/BF00705644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zheng Y., Bender A., Cerione R. A. Interactions among proteins involved in bud-site selection and bud-site assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jan 13;270(2):626–630. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.2.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zheng Y., Cerione R., Bender A. Control of the yeast bud-site assembly GTPase Cdc42. Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange by Cdc24 and stimulation of GTPase activity by Bem3. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jan 28;269(4):2369–2372. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES