Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1996 Jul 1;134(1):149–163. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.1.149

armadillo, bazooka, and stardust are critical for early stages in formation of the zonula adherens and maintenance of the polarized blastoderm epithelium in Drosophila

PMCID: PMC2120925  PMID: 8698811

Abstract

Cellularization of the Drosophila embryo results in the formation of a cell monolayer with many characteristics of a polarized epithelium. We have used antibodies specific to cellular junctions and nascent plasma membranes to study the formation of the zonula adherens (ZA) in relation to the establishment of basolateral membrane polarity. The same approach was then used as a test system to identify X-linked zygotically active genes required for ZA formation. We show that ZA formation begins during cellularization and that the basolateral membrane domain is established at mid-gastrulation. By creating deficiencies for defined regions of the X chromosome, we have identified genes that are required for the formation of the ZA and the generation of basolateral membrane polarity. We show that embryos mutant for both stardust (sdt) and bazooka (baz) fail to form a ZA. In addition to the failure to establish the ZA, the formation of the monolayered epithelium is disrupted after cellularization, resulting in formation of a multilayered cell sheet by mid-gastrulation. SEM analysis of mutant embryos revealed a conversion of cells exhibiting epithelial characteristics into cells exhibiting mesenchymal characteristics. To investigate how mutations that affect an integral component of the ZA itself influence ZA formation, we examined embryos with reduced maternal and zygotic supply of wild-type Arm protein. These embryos, like embryos mutant for both sdt and baz, exhibit an early disruption of ZA formation. These results suggest that early stages in the assembly of the ZA are critical for the stability of the polarized blastoderm epithelium.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (7.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Behrens J., Mareel M. M., Van Roy F. M., Birchmeier W. Dissecting tumor cell invasion: epithelial cells acquire invasive properties after the loss of uvomorulin-mediated cell-cell adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1989 Jun;108(6):2435–2447. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.6.2435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birchmeier W., Weidner K. M., Behrens J. Molecular mechanisms leading to loss of differentiation and gain of invasiveness in epithelial cells. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1993;17:159–164. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1993.supplement_17.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins J. E., Fleming T. P. Epithelial differentiation in the mouse preimplantation embryo: making adhesive cell contacts for the first time. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Aug;20(8):307–312. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89057-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eaton S., Simons K. Apical, basal, and lateral cues for epithelial polarization. Cell. 1995 Jul 14;82(1):5–8. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90045-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fleming T. P., Javed Q., Collins J., Hay M. Biogenesis of structural intercellular junctions during cleavage in the mouse embryo. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1993;17:119–125. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1993.supplement_17.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fleming T. P., Johnson M. H. From egg to epithelium. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:459–485. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Geiger B., Ginsberg D. The cytoplasmic domain of adherens-type junctions. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1991;20(1):1–6. doi: 10.1002/cm.970200102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grawe F., Wodarz A., Lee B., Knust E., Skaer H. The Drosophila genes crumbs and stardust are involved in the biogenesis of adherens junctions. Development. 1996 Mar;122(3):951–959. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.3.951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gumbiner B., Stevenson B., Grimaldi A. The role of the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin in the formation and maintenance of the epithelial junctional complex. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1575–1587. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hortsch M., Patel N. H., Bieber A. J., Traquina Z. R., Goodman C. S. Drosophila neurotactin, a surface glycoprotein with homology to serine esterases, is dynamically expressed during embryogenesis. Development. 1990 Dec;110(4):1327–1340. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.4.1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kirkpatrick C., Peifer M. Not just glue: cell-cell junctions as cellular signaling centers. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1995 Feb;5(1):56–65. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(95)90054-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Knust E. Control of epithelial cell polarity in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 1994 Aug;10(8):275–280. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Knust E., Tepass U., Wodarz A. crumbs and stardust, two genes of Drosophila required for the development of epithelial cell polarity. Dev Suppl. 1993:261–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Larue L., Ohsugi M., Hirchenhain J., Kemler R. E-cadherin null mutant embryos fail to form a trophectoderm epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 16;91(17):8263–8267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.8263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lentz T. L., Trinkaus J. P. A fine structural study of cytodifferentiation during cleavage, blastula, and gastrula stages of Fundulus heteroclitus. J Cell Biol. 1967 Jan;32(1):121–138. doi: 10.1083/jcb.32.1.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. MAHOWALD A. P. ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF THE FORMATION OF THE CELLULAR BLASTODERM IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Exp Cell Res. 1963 Dec;32:457–468. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(63)90186-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Magee A. I., Buxton R. S. Transmembrane molecular assemblies regulated by the greater cadherin family. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1991 Oct;3(5):854–861. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(91)90060-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mays R. W., Beck K. A., Nelson W. J. Organization and function of the cytoskeleton in polarized epithelial cells: a component of the protein sorting machinery. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;6(1):16–24. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90111-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McNeill H., Ozawa M., Kemler R., Nelson W. J. Novel function of the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin as an inducer of cell surface polarity. Cell. 1990 Jul 27;62(2):309–316. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90368-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McNeill H., Ryan T. A., Smith S. J., Nelson W. J. Spatial and temporal dissection of immediate and early events following cadherin-mediated epithelial cell adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1993 Mar;120(5):1217–1226. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.5.1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mege R. M., Matsuzaki F., Gallin W. J., Goldberg J. I., Cunningham B. A., Edelman G. M. Construction of epithelioid sheets by transfection of mouse sarcoma cells with cDNAs for chicken cell adhesion molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(19):7274–7278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.19.7274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miller K. G., Field C. M., Alberts B. M. Actin-binding proteins from Drosophila embryos: a complex network of interacting proteins detected by F-actin affinity chromatography. J Cell Biol. 1989 Dec;109(6 Pt 1):2963–2975. doi: 10.1083/jcb.109.6.2963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Müller H. A., Hausen P. Epithelial cell polarity in early Xenopus development. Dev Dyn. 1995 Apr;202(4):405–420. doi: 10.1002/aja.1002020410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Nelson W. J. Regulation of cell surface polarity from bacteria to mammals. Science. 1992 Nov 6;258(5084):948–955. doi: 10.1126/science.1439806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Näthke I. S., Hinck L. E., Nelson W. J. Epithelial cell adhesion and development of cell surface polarity: possible mechanisms for modulation of cadherin function, organization and distribution. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1993;17:139–145. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1993.supplement_17.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oda H., Uemura T., Harada Y., Iwai Y., Takeichi M. A Drosophila homolog of cadherin associated with armadillo and essential for embryonic cell-cell adhesion. Dev Biol. 1994 Oct;165(2):716–726. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Oda H., Uemura T., Shiomi K., Nagafuchi A., Tsukita S., Takeichi M. Identification of a Drosophila homologue of alpha-catenin and its association with the armadillo protein. J Cell Biol. 1993 Jun;121(5):1133–1140. doi: 10.1083/jcb.121.5.1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peifer M. Cell adhesion and signal transduction: the Armadillo connection. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Jun;5(6):224–229. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)89015-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Peifer M., Orsulic S., Sweeton D., Wieschaus E. A role for the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo in cell adhesion and cytoskeletal integrity during oogenesis. Development. 1993 Aug;118(4):1191–1207. doi: 10.1242/dev.118.4.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peifer M., Sweeton D., Casey M., Wieschaus E. wingless signal and Zeste-white 3 kinase trigger opposing changes in the intracellular distribution of Armadillo. Development. 1994 Feb;120(2):369–380. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.2.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Peifer M. The product of the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo is part of a multi-protein complex resembling the vertebrate adherens junction. J Cell Sci. 1993 Aug;105(Pt 4):993–1000. doi: 10.1242/jcs.105.4.993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Peifer M., Wieschaus E. The segment polarity gene armadillo encodes a functionally modular protein that is the Drosophila homolog of human plakoglobin. Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1167–1176. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90413-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Purcell S. M., Keller R. A different type of amphibian mesoderm morphogenesis in Ceratophrys ornata. Development. 1993 Jan;117(1):307–317. doi: 10.1242/dev.117.1.307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ranscht B. Cadherins and catenins: interactions and functions in embryonic development. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Oct;6(5):740–746. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90102-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Reichmann E., Schwarz H., Deiner E. M., Leitner I., Eilers M., Berger J., Busslinger M., Beug H. Activation of an inducible c-FosER fusion protein causes loss of epithelial polarity and triggers epithelial-fibroblastoid cell conversion. Cell. 1992 Dec 24;71(7):1103–1116. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(05)80060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Reynolds A. B., Daniel J., McCrea P. D., Wheelock M. J., Wu J., Zhang Z. Identification of a new catenin: the tyrosine kinase substrate p120cas associates with E-cadherin complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Dec;14(12):8333–8342. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.12.8333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Riethmacher D., Brinkmann V., Birchmeier C. A targeted mutation in the mouse E-cadherin gene results in defective preimplantation development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 31;92(3):855–859. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.3.855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Riggleman B., Schedl P., Wieschaus E. Spatial expression of the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo is posttranscriptionally regulated by wingless. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):549–560. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90451-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rodriguez-Boulan E., Nelson W. J. Morphogenesis of the polarized epithelial cell phenotype. Science. 1989 Aug 18;245(4919):718–725. doi: 10.1126/science.2672330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rose L. S., Wieschaus E. The Drosophila cellularization gene nullo produces a blastoderm-specific transcript whose levels respond to the nucleocytoplasmic ratio. Genes Dev. 1992 Jul;6(7):1255–1268. doi: 10.1101/gad.6.7.1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanders E. J. Aspects of furrow membrane formation in the cleaving Drosophila embryo. Cell Tissue Res. 1975;156(4):463–474. doi: 10.1007/BF00225106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schejter E. D., Wieschaus E. Functional elements of the cytoskeleton in the early Drosophila embryo. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1993;9:67–99. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.000435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shiel M. J., Caplan M. J. Developmental regulation of membrane protein sorting in Drosophila embryos. Am J Physiol. 1995 Jul;269(1 Pt 1):C207–C216. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1995.269.1.C207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Simons K., Fuller S. D. Cell surface polarity in epithelia. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1985;1:243–288. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.01.110185.001331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Simpson L., Wieschaus E. Zygotic activity of the nullo locus is required to stabilize the actin-myosin network during cellularization in Drosophila. Development. 1990 Nov;110(3):851–863. doi: 10.1242/dev.110.3.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Staehelin L. A. Structure and function of intercellular junctions. Int Rev Cytol. 1974;39:191–283. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60940-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Takata K., Singer S. J. Phosphotyrosine-modified proteins are concentrated at the membranes of epithelial and endothelial cells during tissue development in chick embryos. J Cell Biol. 1988 May;106(5):1757–1764. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.5.1757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Takeichi M. Cadherins in cancer: implications for invasion and metastasis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1993 Oct;5(5):806–811. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(93)90029-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Tepass U., Hartenstein V. The development of cellular junctions in the Drosophila embryo. Dev Biol. 1994 Feb;161(2):563–596. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1994.1054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tepass U., Knust E. Crumbs and stardust act in a genetic pathway that controls the organization of epithelia in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol. 1993 Sep;159(1):311–326. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tepass U., Theres C., Knust E. crumbs encodes an EGF-like protein expressed on apical membranes of Drosophila epithelial cells and required for organization of epithelia. Cell. 1990 Jun 1;61(5):787–799. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90189-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Trelstad R. L., Hay E. D., Revel J. D. Cell contact during early morphogenesis in the chick embryo. Dev Biol. 1967 Jul;16(1):78–106. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(67)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tsukita S., Tsukita S., Nagafuchi A., Yonemura S. Molecular linkage between cadherins and actin filaments in cell-cell adherens junctions. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1992 Oct;4(5):834–839. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(92)90108-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vestweber D., Kemler R. Rabbit antiserum against a purified surface glycoprotein decompacts mouse preimplantation embryos and reacts with specific adult tissues. Exp Cell Res. 1984 May;152(1):169–178. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(84)90241-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Warn R. M., Robert-Nicoud M. F-actin organization during the cellularization of the Drosophila embryo as revealed with a confocal laser scanning microscope. J Cell Sci. 1990 May;96(Pt 1):35–42. doi: 10.1242/jcs.96.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wieschaus E., Sweeton D. Requirements for X-linked zygotic gene activity during cellularization of early Drosophila embryos. Development. 1988 Nov;104(3):483–493. doi: 10.1242/dev.104.3.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wodarz A., Grawe F., Knust E. CRUMBS is involved in the control of apical protein targeting during Drosophila epithelial development. Mech Dev. 1993 Dec;44(2-3):175–187. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(93)90066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wodarz A., Hinz U., Engelbert M., Knust E. Expression of crumbs confers apical character on plasma membrane domains of ectodermal epithelia of Drosophila. Cell. 1995 Jul 14;82(1):67–76. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90053-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Woods D. F., Bryant P. J. Apical junctions and cell signalling in epithelia. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1993;17:171–181. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1993.supplement_17.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES