Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Cell Biology logoLink to The Journal of Cell Biology
. 1996 Nov 1;135(3):725–739. doi: 10.1083/jcb.135.3.725

Pea2 protein of yeast is localized to sites of polarized growth and is required for efficient mating and bipolar budding

PMCID: PMC2121064  PMID: 8909546

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae exhibits polarized growth during two phases of its life cycle, budding and mating. The site for polarization during vegetative growth is determined genetically: a and alpha haploid cells exhibit an axial budding pattern, and a/alpha diploid cells exhibit a bipolar pattern. During mating, each cell polarizes towards its partner to ensure efficient mating. SPA2 is required for the bipolar budding pattern (Snyder. M 1989. J. Cell Biol. 108:1419-1429; Zahner, J.A., H.A. Harkins, and J.R. Pringle. 1996. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1857-1870) and polarization during mating (Snyder, M., S. Gehrung, and B.D. Page. 1991. J. Cell Biol. 114: 515-532). We previously identified mutants defective in PEA2 and SPA2 which alter cell polarization in the presence of mating pheromone in a similar manner (Chenevert, J., N. Valtz, and I. Herskowitz. 1994. Genetics, 136:1287-1297). Here we report the further characterization of these mutants. We have found that PEA2 is also required for the bipolar budding pattern and that it encodes a novel protein with a predicted coiled-coil domain. Pea2p is expressed in all cell types and is localized to sites of polarized growth in budding and mating cells in a pattern similar to Spa2p, Pea2p and Spa2p exhibit interdependent localization: Spa2p is produced in pea2 mutants but fails to localize properly; Pea2p is not stably produced in spa2 mutants. These results suggest that Pea2p and Spa2p function together as a complex to generate the bipolar budding pattern and to guarantee proper polarization during mating.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (3.6 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams A. E., Pringle J. R. Relationship of actin and tubulin distribution to bud growth in wild-type and morphogenetic-mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):934–945. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauer F., Urdaci M., Aigle M., Crouzet M. Alteration of a yeast SH3 protein leads to conditional viability with defects in cytoskeletal and budding patterns. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;13(8):5070–5084. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.8.5070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chant J., Corrado K., Pringle J. R., Herskowitz I. Yeast BUD5, encoding a putative GDP-GTP exchange factor, is necessary for bud site selection and interacts with bud formation gene BEM1. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1213–1224. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90016-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chant J., Herskowitz I. Genetic control of bud site selection in yeast by a set of gene products that constitute a morphogenetic pathway. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1203–1212. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90015-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chant J., Pringle J. R. Patterns of bud-site selection in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1995 May;129(3):751–765. doi: 10.1083/jcb.129.3.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chenevert J. Cell polarization directed by extracellular cues in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 1994 Nov;5(11):1169–1175. doi: 10.1091/mbc.5.11.1169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chenevert J., Valtz N., Herskowitz I. Identification of genes required for normal pheromone-induced cell polarization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1994 Apr;136(4):1287–1296. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cross F., Hartwell L. H., Jackson C., Konopka J. B. Conjugation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1988;4:429–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.04.110188.002241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dorer R., Pryciak P. M., Hartwell L. H. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells execute a default pathway to select a mate in the absence of pheromone gradients. J Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;131(4):845–861. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.4.845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Drubin D. G. Development of cell polarity in budding yeast. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1093–1096. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90001-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Drubin D. G., Jones H. D., Wertman K. F. Actin structure and function: roles in mitochondrial organization and morphogenesis in budding yeast and identification of the phalloidin-binding site. Mol Biol Cell. 1993 Dec;4(12):1277–1294. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.12.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Durrens P., Revardel E., Bonneu M., Aigle M. Evidence for a branched pathway in the polarized cell division of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1995 Feb;27(3):213–216. doi: 10.1007/BF00326151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. FREIFELDER D. Bud position in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1960 Oct;80:567–568. doi: 10.1128/jb.80.4.567-568.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Field C., Schekman R. Localized secretion of acid phosphatase reflects the pattern of cell surface growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1980 Jul;86(1):123–128. doi: 10.1083/jcb.86.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gehrung S., Snyder M. The SPA2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is important for pheromone-induced morphogenesis and efficient mating. J Cell Biol. 1990 Oct;111(4):1451–1464. doi: 10.1083/jcb.111.4.1451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hasek J., Rupes I., Svobodová J., Streiblová E. Tubulin and actin topology during zygote formation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol. 1987 Dec;133(12):3355–3363. doi: 10.1099/00221287-133-12-3355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hicks J. B., Strathern J. N., Herskowitz I. Interconversion of Yeast Mating Types III. Action of the Homothallism (HO) Gene in Cells Homozygous for the Mating Type Locus. Genetics. 1977 Mar;85(3):395–405. doi: 10.1093/genetics/85.3.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huisman O., Raymond W., Froehlich K. U., Errada P., Kleckner N., Botstein D., Hoyt M. A. A Tn10-lacZ-kanR-URA3 gene fusion transposon for insertion mutagenesis and fusion analysis of yeast and bacterial genes. Genetics. 1987 Jun;116(2):191–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.2.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jackson C. L., Hartwell L. H. Courtship in S. cerevisiae: both cell types choose mating partners by responding to the strongest pheromone signal. Cell. 1990 Nov 30;63(5):1039–1051. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90507-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jackson C. L., Hartwell L. H. Courtship in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: an early cell-cell interaction during mating. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2202–2213. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.5.2202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnston G. C., Prendergast J. A., Singer R. A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MYO2 gene encodes an essential myosin for vectorial transport of vesicles. J Cell Biol. 1991 May;113(3):539–551. doi: 10.1083/jcb.113.3.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kilmartin J. V., Adams A. E. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):922–933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lillie S. H., Brown S. S. Immunofluorescence localization of the unconventional myosin, Myo2p, and the putative kinesin-related protein, Smy1p, to the same regions of polarized growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1994 May;125(4):825–842. doi: 10.1083/jcb.125.4.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lupas A., Müller S., Goldie K., Engel A. M., Engel A., Baumeister W. Model structure of the Omp alpha rod, a parallel four-stranded coiled coil from the hyperthermophilic eubacterium Thermotoga maritima. J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 21;248(1):180–189. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Madden K., Snyder M. Specification of sites for polarized growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the influence of external factors on site selection. Mol Biol Cell. 1992 Sep;3(9):1025–1035. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.9.1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Markwell M. A., Haas S. M., Bieber L. L., Tolbert N. E. A modification of the Lowry procedure to simplify protein determination in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Anal Biochem. 1978 Jun 15;87(1):206–210. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90586-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pringle J. R., Preston R. A., Adams A. E., Stearns T., Drubin D. G., Haarer B. K., Jones E. W. Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 1989;31:357–435. doi: 10.1016/s0091-679x(08)61620-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rose M. D., Novick P., Thomas J. H., Botstein D., Fink G. R. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic plasmid bank based on a centromere-containing shuttle vector. Gene. 1987;60(2-3):237–243. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90232-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Segall J. E. Polarization of yeast cells in spatial gradients of alpha mating factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 15;90(18):8332–8336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.18.8332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sivadon P., Bauer F., Aigle M., Crouzet M. Actin cytoskeleton and budding pattern are altered in the yeast rvs161 mutant: the Rvs161 protein shares common domains with the brain protein amphiphysin. Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Feb 20;246(4):485–495. doi: 10.1007/BF00290452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sloat B. F., Adams A., Pringle J. R. Roles of the CDC24 gene product in cellular morphogenesis during the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1981 Jun;89(3):395–405. doi: 10.1083/jcb.89.3.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Snyder M., Gehrung S., Page B. D. Studies concerning the temporal and genetic control of cell polarity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(3):515–532. doi: 10.1083/jcb.114.3.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Snyder M. The SPA2 protein of yeast localizes to sites of cell growth. J Cell Biol. 1989 Apr;108(4):1419–1429. doi: 10.1083/jcb.108.4.1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tkacz J. S., MacKay V. L. Sexual conjugation in yeast. Cell surface changes in response to the action of mating hormones. J Cell Biol. 1979 Feb;80(2):326–333. doi: 10.1083/jcb.80.2.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Valtz N., Peter M., Herskowitz I. FAR1 is required for oriented polarization of yeast cells in response to mating pheromones. J Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;131(4):863–873. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.4.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Welch M. D., Holtzman D. A., Drubin D. G. The yeast actin cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994 Feb;6(1):110–119. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90124-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Yorihuzi T., Ohsumi Y. Saccharomyces cerevisiae MATa mutant cells defective in pointed projection formation in response to alpha-factor at high concentrations. Yeast. 1994 May;10(5):579–594. doi: 10.1002/yea.320100503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zahner J. E., Harkins H. A., Pringle J. R. Genetic analysis of the bipolar pattern of bud site selection in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;16(4):1857–1870. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.4.1857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Cell Biology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES