Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1997 Jun 24;94(13):7098–7102. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.7098

Overexpression of an Arabidopsis thaliana high-affinity phosphate transporter gene in tobacco cultured cells enhances cell growth under phosphate-limited conditions

Norihiro Mitsukawa *, Satoru Okumura *, Yumiko Shirano *, Shigeru Sato *, Tomohiko Kato *, Satoshi Harashima , Daisuke Shibata *,
PMCID: PMC21291  PMID: 9192698

Abstract

A higher plant homologue to the high-affinity phosphate transporter gene of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) PHO84 was isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana. Expression of the Arabidopsis gene PHT1 at high levels in tobacco-cultured cells increased the rate of phosphate uptake. The uptake activity attributable to the transgene was inhibited by protonophores, suggesting an H+ cotransport mechanism of phosphate uptake, and had a Km of 3.1 μM which is within limits characteristic of high-affinity transport mechanisms. These results indicate that PHT1 encodes a high-affinity phosphate transporter. The transgenic cells exhibited increased biomass production when the supply of phosphate was limited, establishing gene engineering of phosphate transport as one approach toward enhancing plant cell growth.

Keywords: PHO84, phosphate uptake, transgenic cells, biomass production


A major constraint to crop production throughout the world is low availability of the essential macronutrient phosphate in soil (13). Higher plants absorb the nutrient from soils as the orthophosphate anion. Much evidence supports an H+ cotransport mechanism for phosphate uptake in higher plants (46). Multiple kinetics for the uptake are observed when examined over an extended range of external phosphate concentrations (from <1 μM to a few tens of millimolars) (7). As most soils are deficient in phosphate (1–10 μM) (8), it is likely that high-affinity phosphate transporters with Km values of 1–5 μM (9) in roots play a major role in phosphate uptake from soils. Understanding the molecular mechanism of phosphate uptake is thought to be an important step in gene manipulation of crops for high yield, especially from phosphate-deficient soils.

Since the isolation of a high-affinity phosphate transporter gene PHO84 from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using pho84 mutants (10), homologous genes have been identified in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa (PHO-5) (11) and the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus versiforme (GvPT) (12). Their characteristic protein structures, especially the 12 membrane-spanning domains, are distinct from that of the Escherichia coli phosphate transporter (13, 14). The expansion of expressed sequence tag (EST) databases has led to the identification of plant homologues of microbial phosphate transporters. (The following GenBank accession numbers were identified as showing homology with PHO84. For A. thaliana, Z33763, T46507, H76973, Z25636 and H36767; for Oryza sativa, D25087, D25132, D39388 and C19700; and for Brassica nupus, H07437.) Muchhal et al (15) isolated two Arabidopsis homologues, named AtPT1 and AtPT2, that shared 32–43% amino acid sequence identity with the microbial phosphate transporters. They reported that the plant genes complemented the phenotypes of the pho84 mutants, and suggested that these homologues encode plant phosphate transporters. However, we have found no conclusive evidence that an Arabidopsis gene (AtPT1) complemented the yeast mutants (this study). Thus, in this study we utilized tobacco-cultured cells to prove that the gene product was functional. During the reviewing process of this manuscript, Smith et al. (16) also reported that they could not complement the yeast mutation with a nearly identical Arabidopsis homologue, APT1.

Here we showed that overexpression of the gene alone in tobacco-cultured cells led to increased phosphate uptake, and that the uptake activity attributable to the transgene had a Km of 3.1 μM, indicating that the plant gene encodes a high-affinity phosphate transporter. We also showed that the transgenic cells exhibited increased biomass production under certain phosphate-limited conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gene Isolation.

Using the A. thaliana sequence found in the expressed sequence tag database (accession no. Z33763), a full-length cDNA clone (1,755 bp) and its genomic clones (5,810 bp) were isolated from DNA libraries of A. thaliana (ecotype Columbia) (Stratagene).

Complementation Tests of the pho84 Mutants.

The full-length cDNA clone, pPHT1C19, has one nucleotide (adenosine) deletion in the coding sequence resulting in a frame-shift mutation; thus, the SacI–BalI fragment (375 bp) containing the deletion was replaced with a normal fragment (376 bp) from the genomic DNA clone pPHTGZ37 to create pPHT1Crep. To express the cDNA under the PHO84 promoter in yeast, the SacI–XhoI fragment of pPHT1Crep was introduced into the EcoRI site of pNE202 (17), and then the HindIII–SacI fragment was introduced into the HindIII–SacI site of pNE302. To express the cDNA under the GAL1 promoter, the SacI–XhoI fragment of pPHT1Crep was introduced at the XhoI site of pYEUra3 (CLONTECH). These constructs were delivered into yeast cells as described (10).

Overexpression of the A. thaliana Phosphate Transporter Gene in Tobacco Cells.

The SacI–HindIII fragment of the genomic clone pPHTGZ37 was placed downstream of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (18) by ligating the fragment with the BamHI–SacI fragment of pMi12 to create p35SPHT1. pMi12 was constructed as follows. The SstII–EcoRI fragment of pBI121 (CLONTECH) was inserted into the SstII and EcoRI sites of pGA643 (Pharmacia). From this construct, the SalI fragment carrying the neomycin phosphotransferase (NPT) II gene for selection of transgenic plants was isolated, and inserted into the SalI site of a pUC19 derivative that carries the NPTI gene of pACYC177 (GenBank accession no. X06402).

p35SPHT1 was delivered into tobacco-cultured cell of the BY-2 cell line using a hand-made particle gun as described (19). Transgenic tobacco cells were selected using an antibiotic, kanamycin, on Murashige–Skoog (MS) medium agar plates (20) and then maintained in liquid MS medium.

Measurement of Phosphate Uptake Rates of Tobacco Cells.

Transgenic tobacco cells were cultured as described in MS medium (21). Before the phosphate uptake experiments, the cells were cultured in MS medium without kanamycin for 1 week. A portion of the cells (5 g) was transferred to 100 ml of fresh MS medium, cultured for 24 h, and used for the phosphate uptake experiments. Phosphate uptake was measured by the method of Sakano et al. (22) with minor modifications. Briefly, the cultured cells were washed four times and resuspended in phosphate-free medium (5 mM Mes-Tris, pH 6.0/20.6 mM NH4NO3/18.8 mM KNO3/3.0 mM CaCl2⋅2H2O/1.5 mM MgSO4⋅7H2O/100 μM cycloheximide/3% sucrose) to a final concentration of 0.1 g fresh weight (fwt)/ml. To start the reaction, 0.5 ml of 2 mM phosphate containing 50 μCi of [32P]phosphate (500 mCi/mmol, Amersham; 1 Ci = 37 GBq) was added to 9.5 ml of the cell suspension to a final concentration of 100 μM phosphate. To stop the reaction, 0.25 ml of the cell suspension was transferred into a microcentrifuge tube with a membrane filter (UFC30GV00; Millipore). The filtrate was collected by centrifugation. The remains of radioactivity in the medium was determined by liquid scintillation spectrometry (Beckman).

Km values of phosphate transporter activity to phosphate in tobacco cultured cells were determined by the depletion-curve method (23).

RESULTS

We isolated an A. thaliana full-length cDNA, named PHT1, that shares amino acid sequence homology with the yeast high-affinity phosphate transporter PHO84 (10), and attempted to complement the yeast pho84 mutant phenotype with the plant gene. [We designate the gene PHT1 according to the rules recommended by the Commission on Plant Gene Nomenclature (24).] However, our PHT1 constructs did not restore normal phosphate uptake to yeast pho84 mutants (see Discussion). Thus, to establish that the PHT1 product functions as a phosphate transporter, we expressed the gene in a heterologous plant cell system (tobacco cultured cells) as shown below.

Ectopic Expression of an A. thaliana Phosphate Transporter Gene in Tobacco Cells.

PHT1 was placed under a strong plant promoter, the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (17), and introduced in cells of the tobacco BY-2 line. A genomic DNA fragment of PHT1 that contained the coding sequence with the second intron (151 bp) was introduced a plant expression vector pMi12 (Fig. 1). The resultant plasmid DNA was delivered into tobacco suspension-cultured cells (Nicotiana tabacum) by particle bombardment. Northern blot analysis of the transgenic lines showed varied levels of gene expression among cell lines. For further analyses, we selected six transgenic lines expressing PHT1 at high levels and six kanamycin-resistant lines carrying the vector alone as controls.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structure of the PHT1 gene and the construct for plant transformation. (Upper) The structure of the PHT1 gene is shown. Open boxes, exon sequences; closed boxes, intron sequences; S, SacI; E, EcoRI; A, ApaI; B, BamHI; H, HindIII. The positions of the translation start codon (ATG) and the translation termination codon (TAA) are shown with arrowheads. Note that the first intron (236 bp) locates in the 5′-untranslational region. (Lower) To introduce the PHT1 gene into tobacco cells by particle bombardment, the SacI–HindIII fragment of PHT1 was inserted between the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (CaMV 35S) and the nopalin synthase gene terminator (tnos) in a plant vector pMi12, named p35SPHT1. pMi12 carries the neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPTII) gene, driven by the nopalin synthase gene promoter (pnos), for selection of transgenic cells by kanamycin.

The tobacco cells expressing the PHT1 gene at high levels showed increased inorganic phosphate uptake (Fig. 2). The stationary-phased cells (7–9 days cultured) were transferred into fresh medium and cultured for 24 h before the uptake experiments. The phosphate uptake rates of the transgene expressing cell lines varied (193–596 nmol/h per g fwt), but correlated well with the amounts of PHT1 mRNA in each cell line. The control lines carrying the vector alone showed uptake rates of 101–203 nmol/h per g fwt. The stationary phase cells in medium deprived of nutrients show substantially higher uptake activity than the cells in nutrient-rich medium; thus, differences of uptake rates of cells carrying the transgene and the control vector were rather small (490–874 nmol/h per g fwt for the former and 435–658 nmol/h per g fwt for latter). These results indicate that heterologous gene expression alone enhances phosphate uptake in plant cells.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Phosphate uptake of transgenic tobacco cells. Inorganic phosphate uptake rates of suspension-cultured cells carrying the A. thaliana phosphate transporter construct p35SPHT1 (filled bar) and the control construct pMi12 (open bar) were measured. Data are the mean ± SD from nine experiments. The amounts of PHT1 mRNA and the 28S rRNA on a Northern blot of each cell line (C11, P38, P11, P2, P10, P27, and P20) are shown under the histogram.

Characterization of the A. thaliana Phosphate Transport Activity in Tobacco Cells.

To characterize the A. thaliana phosphate transport activity, we analyzed the P11 cell line, which had the highest level of expression of the A. thaliana gene among the cell lines examined, in comparison with a control line, C3. Phosphate uptake of these cells was measured 24 h after culturing in fresh medium. The phosphate uptake activities in the two cell lines showed a similarity in their Km values (3.1 μM for P11 and 3.4 μM for C11) (Fig. 3), indicating that they are a high-affinity type. The Km values are consistent with those of other plants with high-affinity phosphate transport activity (5, 9, 22, 25, 26). In addition, phosphate uptake inhibition by protonophores 2,4-dinitrophenol and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, and the plasma membrane H+-ATPase inhibitor diethylstilbestorol (27) (Table 1) suggests that the A. thaliana transport activity is based on an H+ cotransport mechanism. Inhibition by arsenate, a phosphate analogue (28), and competition by phosphate were seen in both plant cells (Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Phosphate uptake in transgenic tobacco cultured cells carrying the Arabidopsis gene PHT1. Phosphate uptake rates (V; n mol/h per g fwt) in a transgenic cell line carrying p35SPHT1 (P11) (•) and a control cell line carrying pMi12 (C11) (○) were determined by the depletion-curve method (23). [S], phosphate concentration (μM).

Table 1.

Effects of inhibitors and competitors on phosphate uptake

Substance* Relative uptake of phosphate, %
pMi12 p35SPHT1
None 100 100
2,4-DNP, 100 μM 0 17
CCCP, 10 μM 15 12
Diethylstilbestrol, 100 μM 24 18
Phosphate, 100 μM 39 39
Phosphate, 2 mM 10 9
Arsenate, 100 μM 63 61
Arsenate, 2 mM 21 20
*

In the assay medium, the phosphate concentration was 100 μM for the phosphate competition experiments, in which cold phosphate was added to 100 μM or 2 mM. 2,4-DNP; 2,4-dinitrophenol, CCCP; carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone. 

A striking difference between the two lines was in pH dependence of phosphate uptake (Fig. 4); the phosphate uptake activity of the P11 cells showed a preference for higher pH than that of the host cell. Three factors may affect the optimum pH of phosphate uptake in higher plants (29): (i) the intrinsic sensitivity of a transporter to pH; (ii) the relative concentration of the possible transported form H2PO4, which corresponds well with the effects of pH on phosphate uptake; and (iii) a thermodynamic control by pH, since an H+ cotransport mechanism has been suggested. It is possible that the A. thaliana phosphate transporter itself has an intrinsic pH response or enhancement of the transporter alone affects the overall response of the cells to pH.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

pH-dependence of phosphate uptake of transgenic tobacco cells. Cultured cells carrying either p35SPHT1 (•) or the vector pMi12 alone (○) were washed four times with phosphate-free medium (see Materials and Methods) of different pH (adjusted by Tris). Just before the phosphate uptake experiments, pH in each medium was measured. Data are the mean ± SD from three experiments.

Increased Cell Growth Under Phosphate-Limited Conditions.

The growth rates of the tobacco cells expressing PHT1 were higher than those of the control cells when the supply of phosphate was limited (Table 2). The stationary-phased cultured cells (0.5 g) of the lines P11, P38, and C3 were cultured in fresh MS medium (30) (100 ml, 2.5 mM phosphate) for 24 h and then allowed to grow in phosphate free MS medium for 4 days. The fresh weights of these cells after culturing for 24 h were almost the same. However, the 4-day-cultured transgenic cells showed 42% higher fresh weights or 55% higher dry weights, on average, than the control.

Table 2.

Cell growth of tobacco lines expressing the A. thaliana phosphate transporter

Cell line Initial weight (a), g After 4 days (b), g Ratio (b/a) Dry weight, g
P11 0.70 ± 0.05 1.52 ± 0.01 2.19 0.15 ± 0.00
P38 0.80 ± 0.08 1.65 ± 0.05 2.07 0.16 ± 0.00
C3 0.73 ± 0.04 1.09 ± 0.01 1.51 0.10 ± 0.01

Cells were cultured in fresh medium (2.5 mM phosphate) for 24 h and then grown in phosphate-free MS medium for 4 days. Data are the mean ± SD from three experiments. 

Chromosomal Location of the Phosphate Transporter Gene.

Chromosomal mapping of the A. thaliana transporter gene PHT1 using recombinant inbred lines (31, 32) showed that the gene located on chromosome 5 (Fig. 5). It has been suggested that the mutant locus for phosphate loading to xylem of A. thaliana pho1 (33) is a phosphate transporter. Another mutation for phosphate accumulation in leaf, pho2, was also found in A. thaliana (34). However, the mapping data indicate that PHT1 is allelic with neither pho1 (mapped on chromosome 3) or pho2 (mapped on chromosome 2). Root-specific expression of AtPT1 (PHT1) was reported by Muchhal et al. (15) and in this study (data not shown); thus, the phosphate transporter seems to be the machinery of phosphate uptake in roots. Allelic tests of the PHT gene family (to be published elsewhere) with pho1 and pho2 are under way in our laboratory.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The chromosomal position of the PHT1 gene. The recombinant inbred lines of ecotypes Columbia and Landsberg erecta (31) and restriction fragment length polymorphism markers (31, 32) were used for mapping of the gene. Segregation data from 100 chromosomes were analyzed with the computer program mapmaker (version 2.0).

DISCUSSION

In this study we showed that the A. thaliana gene PHT1 encodes a high-affinity phosphate transporter. Ectopic expression of PHT1 alone at high levels in tobacco suspension-cultured cells enhanced phosphate uptake activity (Fig. 2). The uptake activity attributable to the gene expression shows a high affinity to phosphate (Km = 3.1 μM) (Fig. 3) and responds to the chemical inhibitors in a similar manner to the endogenous phosphate uptake activity of the host cells (Table 1), but differs in its pH dependence from that of the host cell (Fig. 4). Taken together with the high cell growth attributable to the transgene under certain phosphate-limited conditions (Table 2), these results indicate that the plant gene product homologous to the yeast PHO84 functions to uptake phosphate in plant cells.

This study indicates that a major control point for cell growth can be regulated by gene manipulation of the high-affinity phosphate transporter (Table 2). Phosphate acquisition in cultured cells is complicated by adaptive changes of the uptake activity (Vmax) dependent on the status of phosphate starvation (5, 9). The tobacco BY-2 cell line used in this study also shows such adaptive response (26); for example, the activity of the starved control cells C3 (471 ± 56 nmol/h per g fwt) decreased to 168 ± 39 nmol/h per g fwt 24 h after transferal to fresh medium. However, the transgenic cells have higher phosphate uptake activity even in phosphate-sufficient medium due to constitutive expression of PHT1; for example, the activity of the P11 cells was 874 ± 150 nmol/h per g fwt in phosphate-starved medium and 520 ± 93 nmol/h per g fwt 24 h after transferal to fresh medium. As starved cultured cells of tobacco scavenge phosphate for 1–2 days after transferal to fresh medium (35), higher phosphate uptake activity may result in higher amounts of phosphate accumulation in transgenic cells compared with control cells. As rapidly absorbed phosphate is deposited in vacuoles (36) and thought to be released gradually during cell growth (22), the initial phosphate uptake is a major control point for the subsequent biomass production.

In our study PHT1, the plant homolog of PHO84 failed to complement yeast strains with either of two pho84 mutations. The plant gene was placed under the control of either the PHO84 promoter or the inducible GAL1 promoter in an E. coli/yeast shuttle vector and introduced into yeast pho84 mutants. All transformants examined for each construct showed high level expression of the PHT1 mRNA (data not shown), yet failed to take up phosphate normally when measured as described (37). PHO84 has been suggested to interact with other components for phosphate uptake in yeast (38, 39), and so one potential explanation for our results is that the plant homologue lacks some residue(s) needed for proper interaction with these components. In contrast to our results, Muchhal et al. (15) reported that either of two A. thaliana phosphate transporter cDNAs, AtPT1 (PHT1) or AtPT2 complemented a pho84 mutation. They used a high-copy plasmid vector, pYES2 (20–50 copies in yeast), while we used a low-copy number plasmid vector, pYEUra3 (1–2 copies per plasmid-bearing cell). While this difference could explain our discrepant results, recently, Smith et al. (16) also reported inability to complement pho84 yeast strains with another homolog 99% identical to PHT1 despite using the high-copy pYES2 vector.

Many soils throughout the world are phosphate-deficient (40). Even after fertilization, the added phosphate is immobilized rapidly in soils as insoluble phosphate salts or in organic form, or locked into the crystal lattice of the mica surfaces (41). In this context, the phosphate uptake ability of plants is a major growth-limiting factor. Our results suggest that crops can be improved by enhancing phosphate uptake activity.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Katsuhiro Sakano (National Institute of Agrobiological Resources, Tsukuba, Japan) for critical comments on the pH/activity dependence of plant phosphate transporters.

ABBREVIATIONS

fwt

fresh weight

MS medium

Murashige–Skoog medium

Footnotes

Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. D86591 and D86608 for PHT1 cDNA and genomic sequence, respectively).

References

  • 1.Ozanne P G. In: The Role of Phosphorus in Agriculture. Khasawneh F E, editor. Inc., Crop Sci. Soc. of Am., Inc., and Soil Sci. Soc. of America, Inc., Madison, WI: Am. Soc. of Agronomy; 1980. pp. 559–589. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ae N, Arihara J, Okada K, Yoshihara T, Johansen C. Science. 1990;248:477–480. doi: 10.1126/science.248.4954.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Von Uexküll H R, Mutert E. In: Plant Soil Interactions at low pH. Date R A, Grundon N J, Rayment G E, Probert M E, editors. Dordrecht, The Netherland: Kluwer; 1995. pp. 5–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ullrich-Eberius C I, Novacky A, Fischer E, Lüttge U. Plant Physiol. 1981;67:797–801. doi: 10.1104/pp.67.4.797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ullrich-Eberius C I, Novacky A, van Bel A J E. Planta. 1984;161:46–52. doi: 10.1007/BF00951459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sakano K. Plant Physiol. 1990;93:479–483. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.2.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nandi S K, Pant R C, Nissen P. Plant Cell Environ. 1987;10:463–474. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Crawford N M. In: Arabidopsis. Meyerowitz E M, Somerville C R, editors. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press; 1994. pp. 1119–1146. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schmidt M-E, Heim S, Wylegalla C, Helmbrecht C, Wagner K G. J Plant Physiol. 1992;140:179–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bun-ya M, Nishimura M, Harashima S, Oshima Y. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11:3229–3238. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Versaw W K. Gene. 1995;153:135–139. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)00814-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harrison M J, van Buuren M L. Nature (London) 1995;378:626–629. doi: 10.1038/378626a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Amemura M, Makino K, Shinagawa H, Kobayashi A, Nakata A. J Mol Biol. 1985;184:241–250. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90377-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Surin B P, Rosenberg H, Cox G B. J Bacteriol. 1985;161:189–198. doi: 10.1128/jb.161.1.189-198.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Muchhal U S, Pardo J M, Raghothama K G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:10519–10523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.19.10519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Smith F W, Ealing P M, Dong B, Delhaize E. Plant J. 1997;11:83–92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11010083.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hiraoka E, Murai M, Yano J, Bun-ya M, Harashima S, Oshima Y. J Ferment Bioeng. 1994;77:376–381. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Odell J T, Nagy F, Chua N-H. Nature (London) 1985;313:810–812. doi: 10.1038/313810a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Takeuchi Y, Dotson M, Keen N T. Plant Mol Biol. 1992;18:835–839. doi: 10.1007/BF00020031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Iida A, Morikawa H, Yamada Y. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1990;33:560–563. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nagata T, Nemoto Y, Hasezawa S. Int Rev Cytol. 1992;132:1–30. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sakano K, Yazaki Y, Okihara K, Mimura T, Kiyota S. Plant Physiol. 1995;108:295–302. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.1.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Claassen N, Barber S A. Plant Physiol. 1974;54:564–568. doi: 10.1104/pp.54.4.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Commission on Plant Gene Nomenclature. Plant Mol Biol Rep Suppl. 1994;12:4–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Furihata T, Suzuki M, Sakurai H. Plant Cell Physiol. 1992;33:1151–1157. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shimogawara K, Usuda H. Plant Cell Physiol. 1995;36:341–351. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ninnemann O, Jauniaux J-C, Frommer W B. EMBO J. 1994;13:3464–3471. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06652.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ullrich-Eberius C I, Sanz A, Novacky A J. J Exp Bot. 1989;40:119–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sentenac H, Grignon C. Plant Physiol. 1985;77:136–141. doi: 10.1104/pp.77.1.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Murashige T, Skoog F. Physiol Plant. 1962;15:473–479. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lister C, Dean C. Plant J. 1993;4:745–750. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu Y-G, Mitsukawa N, Lister C, Dean C, Whittier R F. Plant J. 1996;10:733–736. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1996.10040733.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Poirier Y, Thoma S, Somerville C, Schiefelbein J. Plant Physiol. 1991;97:1087–1093. doi: 10.1104/pp.97.3.1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Delhaize E, Randall P J. Plant Physiol. 1995;107:207–213. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kato A, Fukasawa A, Shimizu Y, Soh Y, Nagai S. J Ferment Technol. 1977;55:207–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee R B, Ratcliffe R G, Southon T E. J Exp Bot. 1990;41:1063–1078. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ueda Y, Oshima Y. Mol Gen Genet. 1975;136:255–259. doi: 10.1007/BF00334020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bun-ya M, Harashima S, Oshima Y. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:2958–2966. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.7.2958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bun-ya M, Shikata K, Nakade S, Yompakdee C, Harashima S, Oshima Y. Curr Genet. 1996;29:344–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Barrow N J. In: The Role of Phosphorus in Agriculture. Khasawneh F E, editor. Inc., Crop Sci. Soc. of Am., Inc., and Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., Inc., Madison, WI: Am. Soc. of Agronomy; 1980. pp. 333–359. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bieleski R L. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1973;24:225–252. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES