Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1985 Jun;94(3):269–277. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400061490

Efficacy of low-concentration iodophors for germicidal hand washing.

M E Stiles, A Z Sheena
PMCID: PMC2129479  PMID: 3924994

Abstract

The efficacy of iodophor germicides containing different concentrations of available iodine against transient (inoculated) bacteria and the natural hand microflora was compared with chlorhexidine gluconate (2 and 4%) liquid detergent (Hibitane), non-germicidal soap and a tap water rinse. The tap water rinse was ineffective compared with all other treatments. Only 4% chlorhexidine gluconate liquid detergent and iodophor containing 0.75% available iodine were significantly better than the non-germicidal soap for reduction of transient bacteria, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas fluorescens, that had been inoculated onto hands. These agents also caused a significant reduction in the number of 'natural' microorganisms released from hands after a standard 15 s hand wash. The low-concentration iodophor products and the product containing 2% chlorhexidine gluconate failed to give results significantly better than the non-germicidal control soap. Baird-Parker medium and standard aerobic plate counts were highly correlated (r = 0.82), so that for studies of Gram-negative bacteria inoculated onto hands as a transient microflora, counts on Baird-Parker medium give a reasonable indication of the natural (residual) hand microflora.

Full text

PDF
269

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayliffe G. A., Babb J. R., Quoraishi A. H. A test for 'hygienic' hand disinfection. J Clin Pathol. 1978 Oct;31(10):923–928. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.10.923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkelman R. L., Holland B. W., Anderson R. L. Increased bactericidal activity of dilute preparations of povidone-iodine solutions. J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):635–639. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.635-639.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies J., Babb J. R., Ayliffe G. A. The effect on the skin flora of bathing with antiseptic solutions. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1977 Sep;3(5):473–481. doi: 10.1093/jac/3.5.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. JORESS S. M. A study of disinfection of the skin: a comparison of povidone-iodine with other agents used for surgical scrubs. Ann Surg. 1962 Feb;155:296–304. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196200000-00020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lilly H. A., Lowbury E. J. Transient skin flora: their removal by cleansing or disinfection in relation to their mode of deposition. J Clin Pathol. 1978 Oct;31(10):919–922. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.10.919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ojajärvi J. An evaluation of antiseptics used for hand disinfection in wards. J Hyg (Lond) 1976 Feb;76(1):75–82. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400054966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ojajärvi J. Effectiveness of hand washing and disinfection methods in removing transient bacteria after patient nursing. J Hyg (Lond) 1980 Oct;85(2):193–203. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400063221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peterson A. F., Rosenberg A., Alatary S. D. Comparative evaluation of surgical scrub preparations. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978 Jan;146(1):63–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rotter M., Mittermayer H., Kundi Michael Untersuchungen zum Modell der künstlich kontaminierten Hand; Vorschlag für eine Prüfmethode. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig B. 1974 Dec;159(5-6):560–581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SHELANSKI H. A., SHELANSKI M. V. PVP-iodine: history, toxicity and therapeutic uses. J Int Coll Surg. 1956 Jun;25(6):727–734. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Van der Hoeven E., Hinton N. A. An assessment of the prolonged effect of antiseptic scrubs on the bacterial flora of the hands. Can Med Assoc J. 1968 Sep 7;99(9):402–407. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES