Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1976 Jun;76(3):355–366. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400055285

A source isolator for infected patients.

J R Babb, K Bridges, E J Lowbury, E M Hodgson, P C Trexler
PMCID: PMC2129661  PMID: 819573

Abstract

A plastic, mechanically ventilated source isolator with filters in the air effluent was designed to enable infected patients to be nursed and treated in a general ward or to be transported without risk to staff or other contacts. Two models of isolator were developed. Their potential value was tested by the challenge of heavy dispersal, inside the isolator, of bacteria (a) from patients with burns, during the change of dressings, (b) from contaminated bedding during simulated bed-making, and (c) from the dispersal of a suspension of Bacillus subtilis var. globigii. Sampling of air by slit samplers outside the isolator and, in comparable control patients, from the air of the room in which dressings were changed, showed consistently lower counts of bacteria and of Staph. aureus during dressings when the isolator was used; on removal of the isolator canopy there was, in some experiments, a considerable increase in airborne bacteria, due to residual bacteria in the isolator of to the re-dispersal of bacteria which settled on the patient and his bedding during the dressing. Simultaneous sampling with slit samplers inside and outside the isolator during and after bed-making or dispersal of B. subtilis var. globigii showed an almost complete protection of the air outside the isolator against contamination by bacteria released inside the isolator.

Full text

PDF
355

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARBER M., KUPER S. W. A. Identification of Staphylococcus pyogenes by the phosphatase reaction. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1951 Jan;63(1):65–68. doi: 10.1002/path.1700630108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes R. D., Fairweather D. V., Holliday J., Keane C., Piesowicz A., Soothill J. F., Tuffrey M. A germfree infant. Lancet. 1969 Jan 25;1(7587):168–171. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91187-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beal C. B., Espinosa H., Stites D. P., Watson M. J. A surgical wound isolator. Lancet. 1967 Jan 14;1(7481):97–101. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)92490-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cason J. S., Jackson D. M., Lowbury E. J., Ricketts C. R. Antiseptic and aseptic prophylaxis for burns: use of silver nitrate and of isolators. Br Med J. 1966 Nov 26;2(5525):1288–1294. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5525.1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LEVENSON S. M., TREXLER P. C., MALM O. J., ACONTE M. L., HOROWITZ R. E., MONCRIEF W. H., Jr A plastic isolator for operating in a sterile environment. Am J Surg. 1962 Dec;104:891–899. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(62)90465-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LOWBURY E. J. Air-conditioning with filtered air for dressing burns. Lancet. 1954 Feb 6;266(6806):292–294. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(54)91036-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lowbury E. J., Babb J. R., Ford P. M. Protective isolation in a burns unit: the use of plastic isolators and air curtains. J Hyg (Lond) 1971 Dec;69(4):529–546. doi: 10.1017/s002217240002180x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lynch J., Jameson B., Gamble D. R., Kay H. E. Five-year analysis of protective isolation. Lancet. 1971 May 22;1(7708):1034–1040. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(71)91603-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES