Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1986 Jun;96(3):403–413. doi: 10.1017/s002217240006616x

Comparison of the brucellin skin test with the lymphocyte transformation test in bovine brucellosis.

C C Chukwu
PMCID: PMC2129692  PMID: 3734426

Abstract

The brucellin skin test and the lymphocyte transformation test were compared in heifers infected with virulent Brucella abortus strain 544, heifers vaccinated against brucellosis and unexposed cattle. Results of the in vitro lymphocyte transformation test were consistently positive for all 9 Brucella-infected heifers while the skin test was consistently positive for 6 of the 9 heifers. In 7 heifers repeatedly vaccinated with B. abortus strain-19 vaccine the in vitro test classified 3 animals as positive whereas the skin test identified all the animals as infected during most of the experimental period. Four heifers injected with a single dose of B. abortus strain 19 were consistently negative to the lymphocyte transformation test while the skin test classified all the animals as infected during most of the experimental period. The skin test gave strong reactions indicative of Brucella infection in heifers vaccinated with 'Duphavac' and 'Abortox' vaccines whereas the lymphocyte transformation test was consistently negative with these vaccines. The two tests were negative in unexposed cattle. It was concluded that the in vitro test correlated better with Brucella isolation than the in vivo test did and that the lack of agreement between the results of the two tests is likely to be due to the different antigens used in the assays.

Full text

PDF
403

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baldwin C. L., Antczak D. F., Winter A. J. Evaluation of lymphocyte blastogenesis for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Dev Biol Stand. 1984;56:357–369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bascoul S., Peraldi M., Merino A. L., Lacave C., Cannat A., Serre A. Stimulating activity of Brucella fractions in a human lymphocyte transformation test. Correlation with humoral and cellular immunity. Immunology. 1976 Nov;31(5):717–722. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cunningham B., Miler J. J., Dolan L., McKeon F., O'Meara M. Immunological characteristics in cattle of allergens derived from smooth Brucella abortus S99. Vet Rec. 1980 Oct 18;107(16):369–375. doi: 10.1136/vr.107.16.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Daniel T. M., Hinz C. F., Jr Reactivity of purified proteins and polysaccharides from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in delayed skin test and cultured lymphocyte mitogenesis assays. Infect Immun. 1974 Jan;9(1):44–47. doi: 10.1128/iai.9.1.44-47.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fensterbank R. Diagnostic allergique de la brucellose bovine. 2. Utilisation du test allergique dans les troupeaux infectés. Ann Rech Vet. 1977;8(2):195–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fensterbank R., Pardon P. Diagnostic allergique de la brucellose bovine. 1. Conditions d'utilisation d'un allergène protéique purifié: la brucelline. Ann Rech Vet. 1977;8(2):187–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hartzman R. J., Bach M. L., Bach F. H., Thurman G. B., Sell K. W. Precipitation of radioactively labeled samples: a semi-automatic multiple-sample processor. Cell Immunol. 1972 Jun;4(2):182–186. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(72)90018-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones L. M., Diaz R., Taylor A. G. Characterization of allergens prepared from smooth and rough strains of Brucella melitensis. Br J Exp Pathol. 1973 Oct;54(5):492–508. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaneene J. M., Anderson R. K., Johnson D. W., Muscoplat C. C., Nicoletti P., Angus R. D., Pietz D. E., Klausner D. J. Whole-blood lymphocyte stimulation assay for measurement of cell-mediated immune responses in bovine brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Jun;7(6):550–557. doi: 10.1128/jcm.7.6.550-557.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaneene J. M., Anderson R. K., Nicoletti P., Brown R., Christenberry C. C., Swann A. I., Johnson D. W. Studies on in vitro lymphocyte stimulation assay in cattle naturally infected with Brucella abortus and in cattle vaccinated with strain 19. Am J Vet Res. 1980 Oct;41(10):1586–1589. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaneene J. M., Johnson D. W., Anderson R. K., Muscoplat C. C. Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of purified lymphocyte and whole-blood in vitro lymphocyte stimulation assays in detection of Brucella abortus infection in cattle. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Oct;8(4):396–401. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.4.396-401.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaneene J. M., Johnson D. W., Anderson R. K., Muscoplat C. C. Utilization of a specific in vitro lymphocyte immunostimulation assay as an aid in detection of brucella-infected cattle not detected by serological tests. J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Nov;8(5):512–515. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.5.512-515.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Klesius P. H., Kramer T. T., Swann A. I., Christenberry C. C. Cell-mediated immune response after Brucella abortus S19 vaccination. Am J Vet Res. 1978 May;39(5):883–886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Muscoplat C. C., Chen A. W., Johnson D. W., Alhaji I. In vitro stimulation of bovine peripheral blood lymphocytes: standardization and kinetics of the response. Am J Vet Res. 1974 Dec;35(12):1557–1561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. NOWELL P. C. Phytohemagglutinin: an initiator of mitosis in cultures of normal human leukocytes. Cancer Res. 1960 May;20:462–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rook G. A. Three forms of delayed skin-test response evoked by mycobacteria. Nature. 1978 Jan 5;271(5640):64–65. doi: 10.1038/271064a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thornes R. D. Chronic human brucellosis and anti-anergic treatment with levamisole. Vet Rec. 1977 Jul 9;101(2):27–30. doi: 10.1136/vr.101.2.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thornes R. D. The anergy of chronic human brucellosis. Ir Med J. 1977 Oct 28;70(16):480–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES