Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1976 Aug;77(1):97–104. doi: 10.1017/s002217240005556x

Modified Vi tests in the screening of typhoid carriers.

P Y Chau, A C Chan
PMCID: PMC2129716  PMID: 789764

Abstract

Two tests for the estimation of Vi antibody in sera were studied and their validity in the screening of typhoid carriers was assessed. One was a modified Vi haemagglutination test in which Vi-coated glutaraldehyde-fixed erythrocytes were used as the antigen and Vi antibody resistant to treatment with 2-mercaptoethanol was titrated. The other was a fluorescent Vi antibody test in which acetone-fixed bacterial Vi cells were used as the antigen and the total Vi antibody was titrated. In both tests, the antigens used were stable so that standardization of the tests would not be difficult. The modified Vi haemagglutination test was found equally sensitive but more specific in giving less false positives than the conventional Vi haemagglutination test. The fluorescent Vi antibody test was however found superior to both tests not only in giving less false positives but also in detecting more typhoid carriers.

Full text

PDF
97

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOKKENHEUSER V., SMIT P., RICHARDSON N. A CHALLENGE TO THE VALIDITY OF THE VI TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF CHRONIC TYPHOID CARRIERS. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1964 Sep;54:1507–1513. doi: 10.2105/ajph.54.9.1507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chernokhvostova E., Luxemburg K. I., Starshinova V., Andreeva N., German G. Study on the production of IgG, IgA- and IgM-antibodies to somatic antigens of Salmonella typhi in humans. Clin Exp Immunol. 1969 Apr;4(4):407–421. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper G. N., Singh J. N. Significance of the V-I haemagglutination test. Med J Aust. 1965 Oct 30;2(18):750–755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eskenazy M., Cohen R. Sensitized and stabilized red blood cells coated with Vi antigen as a sensitive tool for the detection of Vi agglutinins. Z Immunitatsforsch Exp Klin Immunol. 1974 Dec;148(3):264–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forrest C. R., Matthews R. N., Robertson M. J., Hanley W. P. Vi reaction in Hong Kong. Br Med J. 1967 May 20;2(5550):472–475. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5550.472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. LANDY M., LAMB E. Estimation of Vi antibody employing erythrocytes treated with purified Vi antigen. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1953 Apr;82(4):593–598. doi: 10.3181/00379727-82-20188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pike R. M., Schulze M. L., Chandler C. H. Agglutinating and precipitating capacity of rabbit anti-Salmonella typhosa gamma G and gamma M-antibodies during prolonged immunization. J Bacteriol. 1966 Oct;92(4):880–886. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.4.880-886.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ROBBINS J. B., KENNY K., SUTER E. THE ISOLATION AND BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES OF RABBIT GAMMA M- AND GAMMA G-ANTI-SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM ANTIBODIES. J Exp Med. 1965 Aug 1;122:385–402. doi: 10.1084/jem.122.2.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wong K. H., Feeley J. C. Isolation of Vi antigen and a simple method for its measurement. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Oct;24(4):628–633. doi: 10.1128/am.24.4.628-633.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES