Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1977 Feb;78(1):1–10. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400055868

Ecological effects of a deodorant and a plain soap upon human skin bacteria.

D J Bibel
PMCID: PMC2129740  PMID: 264493

Abstract

The effects of a commercial trichlorocarbanilide-containing deodorant soap and a commercial plain soap upon the cutaneous flora of individuals were compared. Using a cross-over design, 21 volunteers (10 women and 11 men) washed their forearms at least once a day with one soap for 3 weeks and then switched soaps for another 4 weeks use. By analysis of variance no significant difference in total colony counts was noted among individuals in their use of the two soaps. With the exception of individual variation, neither sequence of use, sex, nor any combination was influential. However, in 20 of 21 subjects an alteration in the composition of skin flora was observed. The deodorant soap, which in six cases increased total flora, tended to reduce or eliminate diphtheroids in 12 to 17 carriers (71%). Fewer kinds of bacteria were also noted. More Staphylococcus epidermidis was seen with the plain soap, but washing with the deodorant soap seemed to favour Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Micrococcus luteus. The impact of this alteration and the use of total counts to measure effectiveness of deodorant soaps were brought into question.

Full text

PDF
1

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bibel D. J., LeBrun J. R. Changes in cutaneous flora after wet occlusion. Can J Microbiol. 1975 Apr;21(4):496–500. doi: 10.1139/m75-070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bibel D. J., Similjanic R. J., LeBrun J. R. A replica-plating method for the identification of Micrococcaceae. Can J Microbiol. 1975 Nov;21(11):1676–1680. doi: 10.1139/m75-245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Duncan W. C., Dodge B. G., Knox J. M. Prevention of superficial pyogenic skin infections. Arch Dermatol. 1969 Apr;99(4):465–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ehrenkranz N. J., Taplin D., Butt P. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria on the nose and skin: colonization and cross-infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 1966;6:255–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans Z. A., Rendtorff R. C., Robinson H., Rosenberg E. W. Ecological influence of hexachlorophene on skin bacteria. J Invest Dermatol. 1973 Apr;60(4):207–214. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12724479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HURST A., STUTTARD L. W., WOODROFFE R. C. Disinfectants for use in bar-soaps. J Hyg (Lond) 1960 Jun;58:159–176. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400038249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MacKenzie A. R. Effectiveness of antibacterial soaps in a healthy population. JAMA. 1970 Feb 9;211(6):973–976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SHEHADEH N. H., KLIGMAN A. M. The effect of topical antibacterial agents on the bacterial flora of the axilla. J Invest Dermatol. 1963 Jan;40:61–71. doi: 10.1038/jid.1963.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shaw C. M., Smith J. A., McBride M. E., Duncan W. C. An evaluation of techniques for sampling skin flora. J Invest Dermatol. 1970 Feb;54(2):160–163. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12257936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stoughton R. B. Hexachlorophene deposition in human stratum corneum. Enhancement by dimethylacetamide, dimethylsulfoxide, and methylethylether. Arch Dermatol. 1966 Nov;94(5):646–648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Voss J. G. Effects of an antibacterial soap on the ecology of aerobic bacterial flora of human skin. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):551–556. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.551-556.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Weinstein G. D., Van Scott E. J. Autoradiographic analysis of turnover times of normal and psoriatic epidermis. J Invest Dermatol. 1965 Oct;45(4):257–262. doi: 10.1038/jid.1965.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wilson P. E. A comparison of methods for assessing the value of antibacterial soaps. J Appl Bacteriol. 1970 Sep;33(3):574–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1970.tb02236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES