Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1978 Apr;80(2):217–231. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400053560

The effect of antimicrobial feed additives on the colonization of the alimentary tract of chickens by Salmonella typhimurium

H Williams Smith, J F Tucker
PMCID: PMC2129995  PMID: 344789

Abstract

Groups of 33 chickens were fed continuously on diets containing feed additives that are employed commercially for a variety of purposes, and were infected orally when 4 days old with a nalidixic acid-resistant mutant of Salmonella typhimurium. The amount of S. typhimurium organisms excreted in their faeces was estimated by culturing them at intervals and in a standard manner on brilliant green agar containing sodium nalidixate; when the chickens were killed their caecal contents were examined by the same technique.

Avoparcin and lincomycin, like nitrovin and tylosin (Smith & Tucker, 1975b), favoured colonization of the alimentary tract by the S. typhimurium organisms as shown by the fact that the chickens to which they were fed excreted these organisms in their faeces in higher concentration and for longer periods of time than did chickens fed on non-medicated diets. Amprolium, monensin, dimetridazole, arsenilic acid and nitro-hydroxyphenylarsonate had no obvious effect on the salmonella excretion pattern.

When only five chickens in each group were experimentally infected so that the effect of the feed additives on infections acquired by contact could be monitored, avoparcin, lincomycin, nitrovin and tylosin again favoured colonization of the alimentary tract with the S. typhimurium organisms and so did dimetridazole. Arsenilic acid, in contrast, hindered the development of infection. Amprolium, monensin and nitro-hydroxyphenylarsonate were without obvious effect.

Many of the chickens that were fed on diets that favoured S. typhimurium colonization, but not those fed on non-medicated diets, were still excreting S. typhimurium organisms in their faeces when they were killed at 56 days of age, the age at which broiler chickens kept under commercial conditions are usually slaughtered.

Full text

PDF
217

Images in this article

230-1Plate 1
on p.230-1
230-2Plate 2
on p.230-2

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alpert E., Monroe M., Schur P. H. A method for increasing the sensitivity of radial-immunodiffusion assay. Lancet. 1970 May 23;1(7656):1120–1120. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(70)92796-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BEARCROFT W. G., JAMIESON M. F. An outbreak of subcutaneous tumours in rhesus monkeys. Nature. 1958 Jul 19;182(4629):195–196. doi: 10.1038/182195a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Casey H. W., Woodruff J. M., Butcher W. I. Electron microscopy of a benign epidermal pox disease of rhesus monkeys. Am J Pathol. 1967 Sep;51(3):431–446. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crandell R. A., Casey H. W., Brumlow W. B. Studies of a newly recognized poxvirus of monkeys. J Infect Dis. 1969 Jan;119(1):80–88. doi: 10.1093/infdis/119.1.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Downie A. W., Taylor-Robinson C. H., Caunt A. E., Nelson G. S., Manson-Bahr P. E., Matthews T. C. Tanapox: a new disease caused by a pox virus. Br Med J. 1971 Feb 13;1(5745):363–368. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5745.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. España C., Brayton M. A., Ruebner B. H. Electron microscopy of the Tana poxvirus. Exp Mol Pathol. 1971 Aug;15(1):34–42. doi: 10.1016/0014-4800(71)90017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall A. S., McNulty W. P., Jr A contagious pox disease in monkeys. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1967 Oct 1;151(7):833–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McNulty W. P., Jr, Lobitz W. C., Jr, Hu F., Maruffo C. A., Hall A. S. A pox disease in monkeys transmitted to man. Clinical and histological features. Arch Dermatol. 1968 Mar;97(3):286–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. NIVEN J. S., ARMSTRONG J. A., ANDREWES C. H., PEREIRA H. G., VALENTINE R. C. Subcutaneous "growths" in monkeys produced by a poxvirus. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1961 Jan;81:1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nicholas A. H., McNulty W. P. In vitro characteristics of a poxvirus isolated from rhesus monkeys. Nature. 1968 Feb 24;217(5130):745–746. doi: 10.1038/217745a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smith H. W. The development of the flora of the alimentary tract in young animals. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1965 Oct;90(2):495–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith H. W., Tucker J. F. The effect of antibiotic therapy on the faecal excretion of Salmonella typhimurium by experimentally infected chickens. J Hyg (Lond) 1975 Oct;75(2):275–292. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400047306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith H. W., Tucker J. F. The effect of feeding diets containing permitted antibiotics on the faecal excretion of Salmonella typhimurium by experimentally infected chickens. J Hyg (Lond) 1975 Oct;75(2):293–301. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400047318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES