Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1970 Jun;68(2):221–232. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400028692

Comparison of materials used for cleaning equipment in retail food premises, and of two methods for the enumeration of bacteria on cleaned equipment and work surfaces

R J Gilbert
PMCID: PMC2130800  PMID: 4914087

Abstract

There is no official scheme for testing disinfectants and detergent/disinfectants for use in the retail food trade and few recommended procedures have been given for the cleaning of equipment with these agents. Therefore, field trials were carried out in a large self-service store. Comparisons were made of the various cleaning efficiencies, as determined by bacterial plate counts, of detergent and disinfectant solutions and machine cleaning oils applied with either clean cloths or disposable paper towels to items of equipment. The most satisfactory results were always obtained when anionic detergent (0·75% w/v) and hypochlorite (200 p.p.m. available chlorine) solutions were applied in a `two-step' procedure.

Tests were made to compare the calcium alginate swab-rinse and the agar sausage (Agaroid) techniques for the enumeration of bacteria on stainless steel, plastic, formica and wooden surfaces before and after a cleaning process. Although recovery rates were always greater by the swab-rinse technique, the agar sausage technique was considered to be a useful routine control method for surface sampling.

Full text

PDF
221

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BROOKES F. C., FENNELL H. A powder-dusting test for the control of dishwashing and the comparison of detergents. Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv. 1952 Dec;11:264–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Favero M. S., McDade J. J., Robertsen J. A., Hoffman R. K., Edwards R. W. Microbiological sampling of surfaces. J Appl Bacteriol. 1968 Sep;31(3):336–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1968.tb00375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gilbert R. J. Cross-contamination by cooked-meat slicing machines and cleaning cloths. J Hyg (Lond) 1969 Jun;67(2):249–254. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400041656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gilbert R. J., Maurer I. M. The hygiene of slicing machines, carving knives and can-openers. J Hyg (Lond) 1968 Sep;66(3):439–450. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400041309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldenberg N., Relf C. J. Use of disinfectants in the food industry. J Appl Bacteriol. 1967 Apr;30(1):141–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1967.tb00283.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schaeffer R. L. Practical aspects of surface sampling. Hospitals. 1968 Apr 16;42(8):94–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Walter W. G. SYMPOSIUM ON METHODS FOR DETERMINING BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION ON SURFACES. Bacteriol Rev. 1955 Dec;19(4):284–287. doi: 10.1128/br.19.4.284-287.1955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. ten Cate L. A note on a simple and rapid method of bacteriological sampling by means of agar sausages. J Appl Bacteriol. 1965 Aug;28(2):221–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1965.tb02146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES