Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1928 Jun 30;48(1):83–104. doi: 10.1084/jem.48.1.83

FACTORS INVOLVED IN THE PRODUCTION OF IMMUNITY WITH PNEUMOCOCCUS VACCINE

I. ACTIVE AND PASSIVE IMMUNITY DURING THE FIRST SEVEN DAYS AFTER INJECTION OF ANTIGEN.

Alvan L Barach 1; With the Technical Assistance of Max Soroka.1
PMCID: PMC2131460  PMID: 19869473

Abstract

1. The antigenic function of a pneumococcus vaccine made from the intact cell was compared with that derived fron a watery extract of the cell free from formed elements. In each instance, the immunity produced was dependent upon type-specific protective substance and not upon the elaboration of the common protein antibody. 2. The vaccine made from the intact cell resulted in both active and passive immunity which began on the 3rd day, increased markedly to the 5th, and remained approximately stationery to the 7th day. In the case of the Berkefeld filtrate of the shaken bacteria and the filtrate of the broth culture, the immunity began on the 4th day, increased to the 5th, and remained approximately stationery to the 7th day. The immunity produced by Pneumococcus Type I vaccine is greater than that produced by Type II. On the 3rd day, mice vaccinated with Type I vaccine resisted 100,000 minimal lethal doses, whereas mice immunized with Type II resisted 10,000 minimal lethal doses. On the 5th day, a larger percentage of mice survived these doses than on the 3rd day. 3. Certain factors related to the preparation and dosage of the vaccine are discussed. 4. As far as the time interval and the degree of immunity produced are concerned, these results suggest the possibility of employing pneumococcus vaccine in suitable doses in the treatment of lobar pneumonia. That an earlier activity of the immunity mechanism could actually be initiated in a patient with lobar pneumonia has still to be demonstrated.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (979.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avery O. T., Heidelberger M. IMMUNOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS OF CELL CONSTITUENTS OF PNEUMOCOCCUS : SECOND PAPER. J Exp Med. 1925 Aug 31;42(3):367–376. doi: 10.1084/jem.42.3.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cecil R. L., Steffen G. I. STUDIES ON PNEUMOCOCCUS IMMUNITY : II. ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION OF MONKEYS AGAINST PNEUMOCOCCUS TYPES II, III, AND IV PNEUMONIA WITH THE HOMOLOGOUS PNEUMOCOCCUS VACCINE. J Exp Med. 1923 Jul 31;38(2):149–161. doi: 10.1084/jem.38.2.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cole R., Moore H. F. THE PRODUCTION OF ANTIPNEUMOCOCCIC SERUM. J Exp Med. 1917 Oct 1;26(4):537–561. doi: 10.1084/jem.26.4.537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dochez A. R., Avery O. T. THE ELABORATION OF SPECIFIC SOLUBLE SUBSTANCE BY PNEUMOCOCCUS DURING GROWTH. J Exp Med. 1917 Oct 1;26(4):477–493. doi: 10.1084/jem.26.4.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dochez A. R. THE PRESENCE OF PROTECTIVE SUBSTANCES IN HUMAN SERUM DURING LOBAR PNEUMONIA. J Exp Med. 1912 Nov 1;16(5):665–679. doi: 10.1084/jem.16.5.665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tillett W. S. STUDIES ON IMMUNITY TO PNEUMOCOCCUS MUCOSUS (TYPE III) : III. INCREASED RESISTANCE TO TYPE III INFECTION INDUCED IN RABBITS BY IMMUNIZATION WITH R AND S FORMS OF PNEUMOCOCCUS. J Exp Med. 1927 Jul 31;46(2):343–356. doi: 10.1084/jem.46.2.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wadsworth A. B. STUDIES ON PNEUMOCOCCUS INFECTION IN ANIMALS : SECOND PAPER: ACTION OF IMMUNE SERA ON PNEUMOCOCCUS INFECTION. J Exp Med. 1912 Jul 1;16(1):78–102. doi: 10.1084/jem.16.1.78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES