Abstract
Background. p27kip1 is a tumour suppressor gene, functioning as a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, and an independent prognostic factor in breast, colon, and prostate adenocarcinomas. Conflicting data are reported for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The aim of this study was to establish the prognostic value of p27kip1 expression in adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head region. Patients and methods. The study included 45 patients (male/female ratio 2:1; mean age 59, range 38–82 years) with adenocarcinomas of the pancreatic head region: 24 – pancreatic head, 18 – periampullary and 3 – uncinate process. The patients underwent the Kausch-Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy (n=39), pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (n=5), or nearly total pancreatectomy (n=1). Eight patients received adjuvant chemotherapy postoperatively. Follow-up time ranged from 3 to 60 months. Tumours were staged according to the pTNM classification (UICC 1997). Immunohistochemistry was done on paraffin-embedded blocks from tumour sections. Quantitative determination of p27kip1 expression was based on the proportion of p27kip1 -positive cells (< 5% = negative). Survival analysis was carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. Results. Positive p27kip1 expression was detected in 22 tumours (49%), whereas 23 tumours (51%) were p27kip1-negative. There were no significant correlations between p27kip1 index and stage or lymph node involvement. Median survival time in patients with p27kip1-positive tumours was 19 months, whereas in patients with p27kip1-negative tumours it was 18 months (p=0.53). A significant relationship was found between p27kip1-negative tumours and radical resection (p=0.04). Multivariate survival analysis revealed that the localization of the tumour (pancreatic head/uncinate process vs periampullary) was the only significant and independent prognosticator (p = 0.01, Cox regression model). Resection margins involvement and grade remained nearly significant prognostic factors (p=0.07 and p=0.09, respectively). Conclusion. We conclude that p27kip1 has limited overall prognostic utility in resected carcinoma of the pancreatic head region, but its potential role as a marker of residual disease needs to be further assessed.
Keywords: p27kip1, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, residual disease
Introduction
The incidence of pancreatic carcinoma has increased during recent decades, and it is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related mortality 1,2. Early systemic dissemination and local cancer progression are limitations of curative treatment 3. Overall cumulative 5-year survival is extremely poor (0.4–1%), and after curative resection is only 5–15% 4,5,6,7. Pathological stage, histological differentiation, localization of the tumour and involved margins are known prognostic factors 8,9,10,11,12,13.
The serum concentration of CA 242, CA 19.9 and MUC1 markers may have the same prognostic significance only in advanced pancreatic cancer 14,15,16. Additional molecular prognosticators, such as p53, cyclin D1, matrix metalloproteinase 1, vascular endothelial growth factor, transforming growth factor beta and DNA ploidy have also been described 17,18,19,20,21,22.
Neoplastic cells progress rapidly through the cell cycle, often ignoring the cell division control mechanisms. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) plays an important role in cell cycle control. p27kip1 is a putative tumour suppressor gene and p27kip1 protein is regarded as an inhibitor of the G1-to-S cell cycle progression by suppressing the kinase activity of cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor family (D-CDK4 and E-CDK2). In addition, p27 is a regulator of drug resistance in solid tumours and promoter of apoptosis 23,24,25. It has been characterized as an independent prognostic factor in breast, colon, and prostate adenocarcinomas 26. There are conflicting data on the prognostic significance of p27 expression in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas 27,28.
The aim of this study was to establish the prognostic value of p27kip1 expression in adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head region following surgical treatment.
Patients and methods
Patients and tumour samples
Between October 1998 and December 2003, 59 consecutive patients with histologically verified pancreatic adenocarcinoma and one patient with cystadenocarcinoma underwent resection. Tissue specimens were evaluated only from 45 patients with proven adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head region: 24 (53%) pancreatic head, 18 (40%) periampullary and three (7%) uncinate process (male/female ratio 2:1; mean age±SD, 59.4 ±11.8, range 38–82 years).
The patients underwent Kausch-Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy (n=39, 87%), Travesrso-Longmire pylorus-preserving pancreato-duodenectomy (n=5, 11.1%), or nearly total pancreatectomy (n=1, 2.2%) with no postoperative mortality. Eight patients (18%) received adjuvant chemotherapy postoperatively. Hospitalization time ranged from 8 to 46 days (mean time ±SD = 19 ±10.4).
The evaluation of the tumour stage was based on the pTNM classification (UICC 1997). Differentiation of adenocarcinoma was described as well/moderate or poor grade. Residual tumour classification (R) was used for assessment of complete tumour removal. Four margins were assessed pathologically following precise marking (coloured pins) in the resection specimen by a surgeon immediately after the operation: 1) common bile duct, 2) stomach or duodenum, 3) pancreatic, 4) retroperitoneal. Resections were classified as microscopically radical (R0), microscopically non-radical (R1), or macroscopically non-radical (R2). Follow-up time ranged from 3 to 62 months (median 19 months).
Immunohistochemistry
Tissue material was routinely fixed for 12–24 hours in 4% buffered formalin of a volume adequate to the size of the surgical specimen. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on processed paraffin-embedded blocks from representative tumour sections using monoclonal antibody p27Kip1 (clone SX53G8, Dakocytomation), which has been confirmed to recognize p27kip1 protein exclusively, showing that p27kip1 staining was absent when the antibody was preabsorbed with blocking p27kip1 peptide 29,30,31. Tumour-specific staining not seen in the surrounding pancreatic or duodenal tissue, with a distinct staining in the cell nucleus and with markedly less or no immunoreactivity in the tumour cell cytoplasm, was considered as a positive cell. Expression of p27Kip1 in small lymphocytes was used as an internal positive control of immunostaining. Sections from pancreatic adenocarcinomas incorporated in the present study material that underwent the staining procedure, with omission of the specific antibody, were used as negative controls.
Quantitative determination of p27kip1 expression was based on the proportion of p27kip1-positive cells (p27kip1 labelling index). Cases with < 5% positive cells were considered negative.
Statistical analysis
The Pearson's χ2 test and Fischer's exact test were used to test the association between the p27 labelling index and clinico-pathological features. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test were used for univariate analysis of the relationship between clinico-pathological features and survival. Multivariate survival analysis was performed with a Cox regression model entering the following covariates: p27kip1 expression, localization of the tumour (pancreatic head/uncinate process vs periampullary), size of the tumour (< 3 cm vs ≥3 cm), resection margins status (R0 vs R1/R2) and differentiation of the tumour (G1/G2 vs G3).
A p value < 0.05 was considered to represent a statistically significant difference. Statistical calculations were performed using Statistica 6.1 for Windows (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).
Results
There were 45 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head region. In 39 of the patients, the tumour was graded as well/moderately differentiated (G1/G2). In the remaining six patients, adenocarcinomas were poorly differentiated (G3). Distribution of the pathological stages was as follows: stage I, 14 patients; stage II, 15 patients; stage III, 14 patients, and stage IV, two patients. Tumour-positive lymph nodes were detected in 12 patients. The number of investigated lymph nodes and number of tumour-positive lymph nodes were as follows (range, mean±SD): 1–16, 4.2±4.0 and 1–13, 5.6±3.5, respectively. An R0 resection was achieved in 33 of 45 cases. A resection line involvement was microscopically recognized in 4 of 45 cases (R1 resection). In eight patients, the tumour mass was removed incompletely as assessed macroscopically (R2 resection). Tumour size ranged from 0.5 to 6.0 cm (mean±SD = 3.5±1.6). Jaundice before operation was detected in 36 (80%) patients.
Positive p27kip1 expression was detected in 22 tumours (49%), whereas 23 tumours (51%) were p27kip1-negative (Figure 1). Patients’ gender, age, tumour size, UICC stage, lymph node metastasis, preoperative jaundice, differentiation and localization of the tumour were not related to p27kip1 labelling index. Among patients with p27kip1-negative tumours radical resection (R0) was performed in 20 (86%) patients, whereas non-radical (R1/R2) resection was carried out in 3 (14%) patients. In the group of patients with a p27kip1 labelling index ≥ 5%, an R0 resection was performed in 13 (60%) patients, whereas non-radical resection was carried out in 9 (40%) patients. A significant relationship was found between p27kip1-negative tumours and radical resection (p=0.04; Fisher's exact test) (Table I).
Figure 1. .
Sections of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. (A) p27Kip1-positive nuclear immunohistochemistry staining. (B) p27Kip1-negative immunohistochemistry staining. Magnification ×200.
Table I. Association between p27kip1 expression and pathological features of carcinomas (Fisher's exact test).
Variables | Number of patients with LI <5% p27kip1 | Number of patients with LI ≥5% p27kip1 | Total (n) | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Female | 9 | 6 | 15 | |
Male | 14 | 16 | 30 | 0.5 |
Age (years) | ||||
≤ 60 | 15 | 9 | 24 | |
> 60 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 0.13 |
Tumour size (cm) | ||||
≤ 3 | 10 | 12 | 22 | |
> 3 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 0.54 |
NA | 1 | |||
Stage | ||||
I | 9 | 5 | 14 | |
II | 6 | 9 | 15 | |
III | 8 | 6 | 14 | |
IV | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.26* |
Lymph node metastases | ||||
Present | 7 | 5 | 12 | |
Absent | 16 | 17 | 33 | 0.7 |
Jaundice preoperatively | ||||
Present | 21 | 15 | 36 | |
Absent | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.07 |
Differentiation of the tumour | ||||
Well/moderate (G1/G2) | 18 | 21 | 39 | |
Poor (G3) | 5 | 1 | 6 | 0.18 |
Resection margins | ||||
Negative (R0) | 20 | 13 | 33 | |
Involved (R1 + R2) | 3 | 9 | 12 | 0.04 |
Localization of the tumour | ||||
Periampullary | 9 | 9 | 18 | |
Pancreatic head/uncinate process | 14 | 13 | 27 | 0.9 |
LI, labelling index; NA, not assessed.
*Pearson's χ2 test.
The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 72%, 57% and 43%, respectively. Median survival was 19 months. All deaths were related to the pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Nineteen patients (42%) died during the follow-up period of the study (median 11 months). Survival of patients with involved margins (R1/R2) was considerably shorter than that of patients after R0 resection. On univariate survival analysis, tumour size (p=0.0002), localization of the tumour (p = 0.0001), differentiation of the tumour (p=0.006) and involved margins (p=0.01) were significant prognostic factors (Table II).
Table II. Univariate analysis between clinico-pathological features and survival (log rank test).
Variables | Patients n (%) | 3-year cumulative survival | Median survival time (months) | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Female | 15 (33%) | 40% | 18 | |
Male | 30 (67%) | 47% | 23 | 0.9 |
Age (years) | ||||
≤ 60 | 24 (53%) | 48% | 19 | |
> 60 | 21 (47%) | 38% | 18 | 0.54 |
Tumour size (cm) | ||||
≤ 3 | 22 (49%) | 77% | 26 | |
> 3 | 22 (49%) | 0% | 13 | |
NA | 1 (2%) | 0.0002 | ||
Stage | ||||
I | 14 (31%) | 50% | 27 | |
II | 15 (33%) | 46% | 16 | |
III | 14 (31%) | 40% | 15 | |
IV | 2 (5%) | 0% | 14 | 0.25* |
Localization of the tumour | ||||
Periampullary | 18 (40%) | 77% | 29 | |
Pancreatic head/uncinate process | 27 (60%) | 14% | 10 | 0.0001 |
Lymph node metastases | ||||
Present | 12 (27%) | 40% | 15 | 0.41 |
Absent | 33 (73%) | 44% | 20 | |
Jaundice preoperatively | ||||
Present | 36 (80%) | 39% | 19 | |
Not present | 9 (20%) | 54% | 11 | 0.99 |
Differentiation of the tumour | ||||
Well/moderate (G1/G2) | 39 (87%) | 50% | 19 | |
Poor (G3) | 6 (13%) | 0 | 5 | 0.006 |
Resection margins | ||||
Negative (R0) | 33 (73%) | 51% | 25 | |
Involved (R1 + R2) | 12 (27%) | 0% | 10 | 0.01 |
p27kip1 labelling index | ||||
< 5% | 23 (51%) | 38% | 18 | |
≥ 5% | 22 (49%) | 47% | 19 | 0.53 |
Adjuvant chemotherapy | ||||
Surgery + chemotherapy | 8 (18%) | 25% | 14 | |
Surgery alone | 37 (82%) | 46% | 19 | 0.4 |
NA, not assessed.
*Cox regression test.
Median survival time in patients with p27kip1-positive tumours was 19 months, whereas in patients with p27kip1-negative tumours it was 18 months (p=0.53) (Figure 2). Even when analysis was stratified according to localization of the tumour (pancreatic head/uncinate process vs periampullary), tumour size or involved margins the survival comparisons of patients with p27kip1-positive and -negative tumours did not reveal significant differences.
Figure 2. .
Overall survival of 45 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in relation to tumour p27kip1 expression (p=0.53; log rank test).
Multivariate survival analysis included five factors: p27kip1 expression, localization of the tumour, involved margins, differentiation of the tumour and tumour size. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that the localization of the tumour (pancreatic head/uncinate process vs periampullary) was the only significant and independent prognosticator (p=0.01, Cox regression model; Table III). Resection margins involvement and grade remained nearly significant prognostic factors (p=0.07 and p=0.09, respectively; Table III).
Table III. Multivariate analysis for predictive factors in patients with pancreatic cancer (Cox regression model).
Variables | Risk ratio (RR) | 95% CI | p value |
---|---|---|---|
Tumour size (cm) | 2.848 | 2.214–3.482 | 0.15 |
≤ 3 | |||
> 3 | |||
Localization of the tumour | 3.471 | 2.210–4.732 | 0.01 |
Periampullary | |||
Pancreatic head/uncinate process | |||
Differentiation of the tumour | 3.232 | 2.568–3.896 | 0.09 |
Well/moderate (G1/G2) | |||
Poor (G3) | |||
Resection margins | 1.252 | 1.068–1.510 | 0.07 |
Negative (R0) | |||
Involved (R1 + R2) | |||
p27kip1 labelling index | 1.396 | 1.000–1.792 | 0.62 |
< 5% | |||
≥ 5% |
CI, confidence intervals.
Discussion
Tumour suppressor gene p27kip1 is regarded as an inhibitor of the G1-to-S cell cycle progression by suppressing the kinase activity of cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor family 26. Many reports have validated the utility of p27kip1 as a prognostic and/or diagnostic marker in breast, colon, lung and prostate adenocarcinomas 26,32,33,34. Almost all studies report decreased p27kip1 expression in more aggressive tumours 26. Contradictory results come from studies on p27kip1 prognostic value in pancreatic carcinoma 27,29,35,36,37,38.
In the present study a p27kip1 labelling index of <5% was found in 51% of the tumours. In other studies such low p27kip1 expression was demonstrated in 41–70% of tumours 27,29,36.
The loss of p27kip1 expression in the tumour tissue was correlated with progressive stage of the pancreatic neoplasm 28,37. Feakins and Ghaffar and Juuti et al. were not able to find correlation between p27kip1 expression and tumour stage 27,36. In two studies association of low p27kip1 expression and poor tumour differentiation was reported 27,38, while in the other reports this phenomenon was not confirmed 28,36. In the present study the p27kip1 expression did not correlate with tumour stage, differentiation of the tumour or tumour size. These varied results suggest that association between p27kip1 expression and clinico-pathological features is weak.
Radical resection is a well established significant prognosticator 39. In tumours located in the pancreatic head region, we found a significant relationship between negative p27kip1 expression and microscopically radical resection (R0). Therefore, low p27kip1 labelling index may identify patients with pancreatic tumours likely to be removed with negative margins. Our results are contradictory to those of Lu et al., who found correlation between low p27kip1 expression and increasing peripancreatic invasion that reduced the possibility of achieving complete tumour removal 28. Previous studies had shown that low p27kip1 expression may contribute to tumour development by either increasing the proliferation of cells or decreasing their apoptosis 40,41,42.
On the other hand, findings consistent with ours have been reported in a series of rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation 43. On the basis of immunohistochemical assessment of residual tumour in the resected surgical specimen, patients with rectal cancers exhibiting positive p27kip1 expression had a fourfold higher risk of recurrence. In that study positive expression of p27kip1 was an independent negative predictor of recurrence-free survival. The sample size of 45 patients in our study may not be adequate to detect a discrete difference in survival of patients with tumours presenting various degrees of p27kip1 expression that was associated with completeness of tumour removal. This may be a probable explanation as to why the low p27kip1 expression was found to be of no prognostic value.
Insignificantly lower 3-year survival rate in the group of patients following resection and adjuvant chemotherapy may be explained by the fact that only patients with more advanced tumours were offered postoperative treatment.
Our study confirmed well-known prognostic factors in pancreatic carcinoma such as tumour size, localization of the tumour, differentiation of the tumour and radicality of resection. We found a correlation between p27kip1 expression and possibility of curative resection. This relationship, if confirmed in larger series, may serve for selection of patients who possibly can benefit from primary radical surgery.
We conclude that p27kip1 has limited overall prognostic utility in resected carcinoma of the pancreatic head region, but its potential role as a marker of residual disease needs to be further assessed.
References
- 1.Eskelinen MJ, Haglund UH. Prognosis of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma: review of clinical and histopathological variables and possible uses of new molecular methods. Eur J Surg. 1999;165:292–306. doi: 10.1080/110241599750006811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Silverman DT, Schiffman M, Everhart J, Goldstein A, Lillemoe KD, Swanson GM, et al. Diabetes mellitus, other medical conditions and familial history of cancer as risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:1830–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.DiMagno EP, Reber HA, Tempero MA. AGA technical review on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:1464–84. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70298-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bramhall SR, Allum WH, Jones AG, Allwood A, Cummins C, Neoptolemos JP. Treatment and survival in 13,560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: an epidemiological study. Br J Surg. 1995;82:111–15. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Neoptolemos JP, Dunn JA, Stocken DD, Almond J, Link K, Beger H, et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001;358:1576–85. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06651-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA. Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg. 1998;227:821–31. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199806000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carr JA, Ajlouni M, Wollner I, Wong D, Velanovich V. Adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: effects of surgical and nonsurgical therapy on survival – a ten-year experience. Am Surg. 1999;65:1143–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Geer RJ, Brennan MF. Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg 1993;165:68–72; discussion 72–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fortner JG, Klimstra DS, Senie RT, Maclean BJ. Tumor size is the primary prognosticator for pancreatic cancer after regional pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 1996;223:147–53. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199602000-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Magistrelli P, Antinori A, Crucitti A, La Greca A, Masetti R, Coppola R, et al. Prognostic factors after surgical resection for pancreatic carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2000;74:36–40. doi: 10.1002/1096-9098(200005)74:1<36::aid-jso9>3.0.co;2-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lundin J, Nordling S, von Boguslawsky K, Roberts PJ, Haglund C. Prognostic value of Ki-67 expression, ploidy and S-phase fraction in patients with pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 1995;15:2659–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Luttges J, Schemm S, Vogel I, Hedderich J, Kremer B, Kloppel G. The grade of pancreatic ductal carcinoma is an independent prognostic factor and is superior to the immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation. J Pathol. 2000;191:154–61. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200006)191:2<154::AID-PATH603>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Takahashi T, Niino N, Ishikura H, Okushiba S, Dohke M, Katoh H. Predictive factors for long-term survival in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:1463–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lundin J, Roberts PJ, Kuusela P, Haglund C. Prognostic significance of serum CA 242 in pancreatic cancer. A comparison with CA 19-9. Anticancer Res. 1995;15:2181–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Safi F, Schlosser W, Falkenreck S, Beger HG. CA 19-9 serum course and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Int J Pancreatol. 1996;20:155–61. doi: 10.1007/BF02803763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.MacLean GD, Reddish MA, Longenecker BM. Prognostic significance of preimmunotherapy serum CA27.29 (MUC-1) mucin level after active specific immunotherapy of metastatic adenocarcinoma patients. J Immunother. 1997;20:70–8. doi: 10.1097/00002371-199701000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Teraoka H, Sawada T, Yamashita Y, Nakata B, Ohira M, Ishikawa T, et al. TGF-beta1 promotes liver metastasis of pancreatic cancer by modulating the capacity of cellular invasion. Int J Oncol. 2001;19:709–15. doi: 10.3892/ijo.19.4.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li Y, Bhuiyan M, Vaitkevicius VK, Sarkar FH. Structural alteration of p53 protein correlated to survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 1999;18:104–10. doi: 10.1097/00006676-199901000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kawesha A, Ghaneh P, Andren-Sandberg A, Ograed D, Skar R, Dawiskiba S, et al. K-ras oncogene subtype mutations are associated with survival but not expression of p53, p16(INK4A), p21(WAF-1), cyclin D1, erbB-2 and erbB-3 in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2000;89:469–74. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20001120)89:6<469::aid-ijc1>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Maatta M, Soini Y, Liakka A, Autio-Harmainen H. Differential expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and membrane type 1-MMP in hepatocellular and pancreatic adenocarcinoma: implications for tumor progression and clinical prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:2726–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lim YJ, Lee JK, Park CK, Song SY, Jang WY, Ha HY, et al. Prognostic value of VEGF in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Korean J Intern Med. 2004;19:10–14. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2004.19.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rugge M, Sonego F, Sessa F, Leandro G, Capella C, Sperti C, et al. Nuclear DNA content and pathology in radically treated pancreatic carcinoma. The prognostic significance of DNA ploidy, histology and nuclear grade. Cancer. 1996;77:459–66. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960201)77:3<459::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.St Croix B, Florenes VA, Rak JW, Flanagan M, Bhattacharya N, Slingerland JM, et al. Impact of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 on resistance of tumor cells to anticancer agents. Nat Med. 1996;2:1204–10. doi: 10.1038/nm1196-1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Katayose Y, Kim M, Rakkar AN, Li Z, Cowan KH, Seth P. Promoting apoptosis: a novel activity associated with the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27. Cancer Res. 1997;57:5441–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Levkau B, Koyama H, Raines EW, Clurman BE, Herren B, Orth K, et al. Cleavage of p21Cip1/Waf1 and p27Kip1 mediates apoptosis in endothelial cells through activation of Cdk2: role of a caspase cascade. Mol Cell. 1998;1:553–63. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80055-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lloyd RV, Erickson LA, Jin L, Kulig E, Qian X, Cheville JC, et al. p27kip1: a multifunctional cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor with prognostic significance in human cancers. Am J Pathol. 1999;154:313–23. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65277-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Feakins RM, Ghaffar AH. p27 Kip1 expression is reduced in pancreatic carcinoma but has limited prognostic value. Hum Pathol. 2003;34:385–90. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2003.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lu CD, Morita S, Ishibashi T, Hara H, Isozaki H, Tanigawa N. Loss of p27Kip1 expression independently predicts poor prognosis for patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1999;85:1250–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hu YX, Watanabe H, Li P, Wang Y, Ohtsubo K, Yamaguchi Y, et al. An immunohistochemical analysis of p27 expression in human pancreatic carcinomas. Pancreas. 2000;21:226–30. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200010000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ghaneh P, Kawesha A, Evans JD, Neoptolemos JP. Molecular prognostic markers in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s005340200000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Uemoto S. Classification of pancreatic cancer: comparison of Japanese and UICC classifications. Pancreas. 2004;28:231–4. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200404000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Goto A, Niki T, Moriyama S, Funata N, Moriyama H, Nishimura Y, et al. Immunohistochemical study of Skp2 and Jab1, two key molecules in the degradation of P27, in lung adenocarcinoma. Pathol Int. 2004;54:675–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2004.01679.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Claudio PP, Zamparelli A, Garcia FU, Claudio L, Ammirati G, Farina A, et al. Expression of cell-cycle-regulated proteins pRb2/p130, p107, p27(kip1), p53, mdm-2, and Ki-67 (MIB-1) in prostatic gland adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:1808–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Spataro VJ, Litman H, Viale G, Maffini F, Masullo M, Golouh R, et al. Decreased immunoreactivity for p27 protein in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma is correlated with HER-2/neu overexpression and with benefit from one course of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with negative lymph node status: results from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial V. Cancer. 2003;97:1591–600. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fukumoto A, Ikeda N, Sho M, Tomoda K, Kanehiro H, Hisanaga M, et al. Prognostic significance of localized p27Kip1 and potential role of Jab1/CSN5 in pancreatic cancer. Oncol Rep. 2004;11:277–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Juuti A, Nordling S, Louhimo J, Lundin J, von Boguslawski K, Haglund C. Loss of p27 expression is associated with poor prognosis in stage I-II pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2003;65:371–7. doi: 10.1159/000074651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rahman A, Maitra A, Ashfaq R, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Hansel DE. Loss of p27 nuclear expression in a prognostically favorable subset of well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120:685–90. doi: 10.1309/LPJB-RGQX-95KR-Y3G3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yue H, Song FL, Zhang N, Feng XL, An TY, Yu JP. Expression of p27(kip1), Rb protein and proliferating cell nuclear antigen and its relationship with clinicopathology in human pancreatic cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2003;2:142–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, Seiler CA, Friess H, Buchler MW. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2004;91:586–94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Slingerland J, Pagano M. Regulation of the cdk inhibitor p27 and its deregulation in cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2000;183:10–17. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200004)183:1<10::AID-JCP2>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Katayose Y, Kim M, Rakkar AN, Li Z, Cowan KH, Seth P. Promoting apoptosis: a novel activity associated with the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27. Cancer Res. 1997;57:5441–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tenjo T, Toyoda M, Okuda J, Watanabe I, Yamamoto T, Tanaka K, et al. Prognostic significance of p27(kip1) protein expression and spontaneous apoptosis in patients with colorectal adenocarcinomas. Oncology. 2000;58:45–51. doi: 10.1159/000012078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Moore HG, Shia J, Klimstra DS, Ruo L, Mazumdar M, Schwartz GK, et al. Expression of p27 in residual rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation predicts long-term outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11:955–61. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2004.03.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]