Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1932 Feb 29;55(3):441–444. doi: 10.1084/jem.55.3.441

PROPERTIES OF THE CAUSATIVE AGENT OF A CHICKEN TUMOR

II. THE INACTIVATION OF THE TUMOR-PRODUCING AGENT BY MONOCHROMATIC ULTRA-VIOLET LIGHT

Ernest Sturm 1, Frederick L Gates 1, James B Murphy 1
PMCID: PMC2132106  PMID: 19870002

Abstract

Even though part of the energy of the incident light is probably absorbed by chemical entities which play no part in the specific reaction of inactivation, nevertheless the wave lengths most active in destroying biological cells or agents will presumably be found to be among those absorbed in the highest proportion. This would indicate that the curves here presented are approximately reciprocal to the coefficients of absorption of particular substances, the destruction of which caused the inactivation of the agents or the death of the cells. The similarity between the curves for bacteria, virus, and phage, both in shape and in total involved energies, suggests the presence of a common factor, or of closely related chemical entities, sensitive to ultra-violet light, whereas the data for the tumor agent suggest that its inactivation is due to the destruction of a substance having an essentially different spectral absorption, and therefore of a different chemical character. While the amount of ultra-violet energy required to affect the tumor agent is great, it is still less than that involved in the inactivation of some of the enzymes (7). A study is under way to compare the deduced spectral analysis with the actual coefficients of absorption of the highly purified tumor agent.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (194.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Rivers T. M., Gates F. L. ULTRA-VIOLET LIGHT AND VACCINE VIRUS : II. THE EFFECT OF MONOCHROMATIC ULTRA-VIOLET LIGHT UPON VACCINE VIRUS. J Exp Med. 1928 Jan 1;47(1):45–49. doi: 10.1084/jem.47.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rous P. RESISTANCE TO A TUMOR-PRODUCING AGENT AS DISTINCT FROM RESISTANCE TO THE IMPLANTED TUMOR CELLS : OBSERVATIONS WITH A SARCOMA OF THE FOWL. J Exp Med. 1913 Oct 1;18(4):416–427. doi: 10.1084/jem.18.4.416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES