Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1981 Jun;86(3):369–377. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400069138

Observations on the occurrence of Salmonella cholerae-suis and other salmonellas in two herds of feeder pigs.

D R Williams, D Hunter, J Binder, E Hough
PMCID: PMC2133992  PMID: 7240737

Abstract

Modified brilliant green agar (BGA), Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate, Rappaport's and selenite F broths were compared for their efficiency in isolating salmonellas from pigs and their excreta. It was concluded that BGA and Rappaport's broth were the media of choice. Where searches were made for Salmonella cholerae-suis alone, the use of a trehalose McConkey agar provided a rapid method of differentiating S. cholerae-suis, which does not ferment trehalose, from the majority of other salmonellas, which do ferment trehalose. Casualties were collected from two farms where infection with S. cholerae-suis was endemic. The isolation rates of S. cholerae-suis from different carcase sites were compared in order to determine the relative importance of the salivary, upper respiratory and faecal routes of excretion. S. cholerae-suis was isolated from numerous carcase sites in carriers including the salivary glands, tonsils, trachea and lungs. However, isolations from the nasal passages, mouth, pharynx and gastro-intestinal tract of carriers were either infrequent or absent. When, in a further study, S. cholerae-suis was isolated from only 3/414 faeces, 1/170 nasal swabs and not at all from 170 oral swabs taken from live pigs, it was concluded that there must be more significant modes of transmission than from the salivary glands, upper respiratory or gastro-intestinal tracts. Cannibalism was considered to be a possibility. In contrast to S. cholerae-suis, other salmonellas were frequently isolated from randomly collected faeces and from the gastro-intestinal tract as well as other sites in casualties.

Full text

PDF
369

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. EMBERLEY N. W., JAMESON J. E. A substitute for bile salts in culture media. J Gen Microbiol. 1956 Aug;15(1):198–204. doi: 10.1099/00221287-15-1-198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harvey R. W., Price T. H., Morgan J. Salmonella surveillance with reference to pigs--Cardiff abattoir, 1968-1975. J Hyg (Lond) 1977 Jun;78(3):439–448. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400056333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heard T. W., Jennett N. E., Linton A. H. The incidence of Salmonella excretion in various pig populations from 1966 to 1968. Br Vet J. 1969 Dec;125(12):635–644. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)48610-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KONFORTI N., NAVON B., RAPPAPORT F. A new enrichment medium for certain Salmonellae. J Clin Pathol. 1956 Aug;9(3):261–266. doi: 10.1136/jcp.9.3.261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McCaughey W. J., McClelland T. G., Roddy R. M. Salmonella isolations in pigs. Vet Rec. 1973 Feb 24;92(8):191–194. doi: 10.1136/vr.92.8.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Richardson A., Fawcett A. R. Salmonella dublin infection in claves: the value of rectal swabs in diagnosis and epidemiological studies. Br Vet J. 1973 Mar-Apr;129(2):151–156. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1935(17)36539-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. SMITH H. W. The evaluation of culture media for the isolation of salmonellae from faeces. J Hyg (Lond) 1952 Mar;50(1):21–36. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400019409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Scott A. J. Bacteria and disease of the biliary tract. Gut. 1971 Jun;12(6):487–492. doi: 10.1136/gut.12.6.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sojka W. J., Wray C., Shreeve J., Benson A. J. Incidence of salmonella infection in animals in England and Wales 1968--1974. J Hyg (Lond) 1977 Feb;78(1):43–56. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400055923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tannock G. W., Smith J. M. A Salmonella carrier state involving the upper respiratory tract of mice. J Infect Dis. 1971 May;123(5):502–506. doi: 10.1093/infdis/123.5.502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES