Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1981 Oct;87(2):171–177. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400069370

Trials of the anticoagulant rodenticides bromadiolone and difenacoum against the house mouse (Mus musculus L.).

F P Rowe, C J Plant, A Bradfield
PMCID: PMC2134035  PMID: 7288171

Abstract

Laboratory and field trials were conducted to determine the efficacy of the anticoagulant rodenticide bromadiolone against the house mouse (Mus musculus). In laboratory feeding tests, family groups of warfarin-resistant mice maintained in pens and conditioned to feeding on plain foods were offered pinhead oatmeal bait containing bromadiolone at 0.005%. Overall mortality in replicated 21-day poison treatments was 55/58 or 94.8%. Six field trials were carried out, using the same poison bait, against mice infesting farm buildings. Treatment success, estimated from the results of census baitings conducted before and after treatment, ranged between 60.4% and 100%, mean 92.4%. In equivalent field trials using difenacoum, another newly developed anticoagulant rodenticide, the control achieved ranged between 70.2% and 100%, mean 96.0%. Five field trials, three involving bromadiolone and two difenacoum, were not completely successful and the surviving mice were removed for laboratory examination. In 21-day toxicity tests, each animal was fed the poison bait offered to it earlier in the field. Bromadiolone and difenacoum gave kills of 12/21 (57.1%) and 9/11 (81.8%) respectively. The possible emergence of mouse populations resistant to these anticoagulants is considered.

Full text

PDF
171

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hadler M. R., Redfern R., Rowe F. P. Laboratory evaluation of difenacoum as a rodenticide. J Hyg (Lond) 1975 Jun;74(3):441–448. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400046957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Huson L. W. Statistical analysis of comparative field trials of acute rodenticides. J Hyg (Lond) 1980 Jun;84(3):341–346. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400026863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Redfern R., Gill J. E., Hadler M. R. Laboratory evaluation of WBA 8119 as a rodenticide for use against warfarin-resistant and non-resistant rats and mice. J Hyg (Lond) 1976 Dec;77(3):419–426. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400055807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Redfern R., Gill J. E. Laboratory evaluation of bromadiolone as a rodenticide for use against warfarin-resistant and non-resistant rats and mice. J Hyg (Lond) 1980 Apr;84(2):263–268. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400026760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rowe F. P., Bradfield A. Trials of the anticoagulants rodenticide WBA 8119 against confined colonies of warfarin-resistant house mice (Mus musculus L.). J Hyg (Lond) 1976 Dec;77(3):427–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rowe F. P., Swinney T., Plant C. Field trials of brodifacoum (WBA 8119) against the house mouse (Mus musculus L.). J Hyg (Lond) 1978 Oct;81(2):197–201. doi: 10.1017/s002217240002502x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES