Skip to main content
The Journal of Hygiene logoLink to The Journal of Hygiene
. 1982 Oct;89(2):311–320. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400070844

Radial haemolysis for the detection of rubella antibody in acute postnatal rubella.

P Morgan-Capner, C Burgess, S Fisher-Hoch
PMCID: PMC2134210  PMID: 7130706

Abstract

One hundred and forty-eight sera from 101 cases of acute postnatal rubella were examined by the radial haemolysis (RH) technique currently recommended by the Public Health Laboratory Service of the United Kingdom. In 75 cases the date of onset of rash was known. No sera were RH positive until the third day after the onset of rash and one serum was still negative at 9 days. By 10 days all sera gave a zone of at least 10 mm. The antibody response detected by RH appears later than that detected by haemagglutination inhibition (HI). Thirty-nine of the 101 cases could be diagnosed by seroconversion or a significant rise in titre using the HI test (diagnosis of the remainder depending upon rubella-specific IgM tests). Using the RH test this figure rises to 48 but in ten of these cases reliance on RH would have meant a delay in diagnosis. The results also indicate that many more sera would need to be tested for rubella-specific IgM if the RH test was used instead of the HI test for evaluating possible cases and contacts of rubella.

Full text

PDF
311

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Champsaur H., Dussaix E., Tournier P. Hemagglutination inhibition, single radial hemolysis, and ELISA tests for the detection of IgG and IgM to rubella virus. J Med Virol. 1980;5(4):273–286. doi: 10.1002/1096-9071(1980)5:4<273::aid-jmv1890050403>3.0.co;2-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Forger J. M., 3rd, Gilfillan R. F. Single-radial hemolysis as a cost-effective determinant of Rubella antibody status. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Jan;9(1):115–119. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.1.115-119.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grillner L., Strannegård O. Evaluation of the hemolysis-in-gel test for the screening of rubella immunity and the demonstration of recent infection. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Feb;3(2):86–90. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.2.86-90.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harnett G. B., Palmer C. A., Mackay-Scollay E. M. Single-radial-hemolysis test for the assay of rubella antibody in antenatal, vaccinated, and rubella virus-infected patients. J Infect Dis. 1979 Dec;140(6):937–944. doi: 10.1093/infdis/140.6.937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kurtz J. B., Mortimer P. P., Mortimer P. R., Morgan-Capner P., Shafi M. S., White G. B. Rubella antibody measured by radial haemolysis. Characteristics and performance of a simple screening method for use in diagnostic laboratories. J Hyg (Lond) 1980 Apr;84(2):213–222. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400026711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Morgan-Capner P., Davies E., Pattison J. R. Rubella-specific IgM detection using Sephacryl S-300 gel filtration. J Clin Pathol. 1980 Nov;33(11):1082–1085. doi: 10.1136/jcp.33.11.1082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Strannegård O., Grillner L., Lindberg I. M. Hemolysis-in-gel test for the demonstration of antibodies to rubella virus. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jun;1(6):491–494. doi: 10.1128/jcm.1.6.491-494.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vänänen P., Vaheri A. Hemolysis-in-gel test in immunity surveys and diagnosis of rubella. J Med Virol. 1979;3(4):245–252. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890030402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Hygiene are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES