Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1941 Jul 31;74(2):145–166. doi: 10.1084/jem.74.2.145

SECOND ATTACKS OF POLIOMYELITIS

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

Howard A Howe 1, David Bodian 1
PMCID: PMC2135172  PMID: 19871123

Abstract

1. It was found in forty rhesus monkeys that intracerebral, intraocular, intracutaneous, intraperitoneal, intraspinal, and neural inoculations of poliomyelitis virus produced no lesions in the olfactory bulbs despite the fact that the animals contracted pronounced paralyses. This indicated that the virus could be restricted to certain neuronal systems. 2. Similarly intranasal inoculation of seven animals produced no lesions in the ciliary ganglia. 3. Two monkeys convalescent from an intracutaneous and an intracerebral inoculation respectively had further paralyses after intranasal inoculation of heterologous virus. A third animal convalescent from an intranasal inoculation showed extension of lesions after intranasal and intraocular inoculation with heterologous virus. 4. Two spinal animals in which an attack of poliomyelitis was limited to an isolated segment of spinal cord, contracted typical paralyses in the previously uninvaded portions of the CNS following intranasal inoculation of homologous virus. 5. Four of six convalescent monkeys showed extension of lesions but no clinical signs after homologous virus inoculation through a previously un-invaded portal. 6. Four animals convalescent from a unilateral intranasal inoculation showed evidence of new invasion in the opposite olfactory bulb but no extension of paralyses following a second inoculation of homologous virus into the appropriate nostril. 7. Two animals had second attacks after heterologous second inoculations. The intranasal portal was employed for both exposures. 8. It thus seems apparent that in the rhesus monkey a second attack of poliomyelitis, whether paralytic or not, seems to depend upon the strains of virus used and the degree to which virus is disseminated through the neuraxis during the first exposure. 9. The above experimental data emphasize the difficulty of utilizing the rhesus monkey for experiments seeking to elucidate the mechanisms of immunity in man and suggest that human immunity to poliomyelitis does not result from immunization of the nervous system but rather is the result of some process which prevents infective quantities of active virus from reaching nervous tissue.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.5 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brodie M., Fischer A. E., Stillerman M. NEUTRALIZATION TESTS IN POLIOMYELITIS. SERA TAKEN DURING THE ACUTE AND CONVALESCENT STAGES OF THE DISEASE AND TESTED WITH A PASSAGE VIRUS AND A STRAIN ISOLATED DURING THE 1935 NEW YORK CITY OUTBREAK. J Clin Invest. 1937 May;16(3):447–461. doi: 10.1172/JCI100870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Einarson L. A Method for Progressive Selective Staining of Nissl and Nuclear Substance in Nerve Cells. Am J Pathol. 1932 May;8(3):295–308.5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Flexner S., Lewis P. A. EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIC POLIOMYELITIS IN MONKEYS. J Exp Med. 1910 Mar 14;12(2):227–255. doi: 10.1084/jem.12.2.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flexner S. REINFECTION (SECOND ATTACK) IN EXPERIMENTAL POLIOMYELITIS. J Exp Med. 1937 Mar 31;65(4):497–513. doi: 10.1084/jem.65.4.497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Olitsky P. K., Cox H. R. EXPERIMENTS ON ACTIVE IMMUNIZATION AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL POLIOMYELITIS. J Exp Med. 1936 Jan 1;63(1):109–125. doi: 10.1084/jem.63.1.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Paul J. R., Trask J. D. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RECENTLY ISOLATED HUMAN STRAINS AND A PASSAGE STRAIN OF POLIOMYELITIS VIRUS. J Exp Med. 1933 Oct 31;58(5):513–529. doi: 10.1084/jem.58.5.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rous P., McMaster P. D., Hudack S. S. THE FIXATION AND PROTECTION OF VIRUSES BY THE CELLS OF SUSCEPTIBLE ANIMALS. J Exp Med. 1935 Apr 30;61(5):657–688. doi: 10.1084/jem.61.5.657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sabin A. B., Olitsky P. K. HUMORAL ANTIBODIES AND RESISTANCE OF VACCINATED AND CONVALESCENT MONKEYS TO POLIOMYELITIS VIRUS. J Exp Med. 1936 Oct 31;64(5):739–748. doi: 10.1084/jem.64.5.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sabin A. B., Ward R. THE NATURAL HISTORY OF HUMAN POLIOMYELITIS : I. DISTRIBUTION OF VIRUS IN NERVOUS AND NON-NERVOUS TISSUES. J Exp Med. 1941 May 31;73(6):771–793. doi: 10.1084/jem.73.6.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schultz E. W., Gebhardt L. P. On the Problem of Immunization Against Poliomyelitis. Cal West Med. 1935 Aug;43(2):111–112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Trask J. D., Paul J. R., Beebe A. R., German W. J. VIRUSES OF POLIOMYELITIS : AN IMMUNOLOGICAL COMPARISON OF SIX STRAINS. J Exp Med. 1937 Apr 30;65(5):687–704. doi: 10.1084/jem.65.5.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES