Skip to main content
The Journal of Experimental Medicine logoLink to The Journal of Experimental Medicine
. 1947 May 31;85(6):559–569. doi: 10.1084/jem.85.6.559

INFLUENCE OF ANESTHESIA ON EXPERIMENTAL NEUROTROPIC VIRUS INFECTIONS

II. IN VITRO STUDIES WITH THE VIRUSES OF WESTERN AND EASTERN EQUINE ENCEPHALOMYELITIS, ST. LOUIS ENCEPHALITIS, POLIOMYELITIS (LANSING), AND RABIES

S Edward Sulkin 1, Christine Zarafonetis 1
PMCID: PMC2135684  PMID: 19871636

Abstract

1. Experimental neurotropic virus infections previously shown to be altered by ether anesthesia are caused by viruses destroyed in vitro by anesthetic ether; this group includes the viruses of Eastern equine encephalomyelitis, Western equine encephalomyelitis, and St. Louis encephalitis. 2. Experimental neurotropic virus infections which were not altered by ether anesthesia are caused by viruses which are refractory to the in vitro virucidal activity of even large amounts of anesthetic ether; this group includes the viruses of poliomyelitis (Lansing) and rabies. 3. Quantitative studies of the in vitro virucidal activity of ether indicate that concentrations of this anesthetic within the range found in central nervous system tissues of anesthetized animals possess no virucidal activity. 4. The lowest concentration of ether possessing significant virucidal capacity is more than fifteen times the maximum concentration of the anesthetic tolerated by the experimental animal. 5. Concentrations of ether 50 to 100 times the maximum amount tolerated by the anesthetized animal are capable of destroying large amounts of susceptible viruses, the average lethal dose (LD50) being reduced more than 5 log units. 6. On the basis of the studies presented in this report, it cannot be concluded that direct virucidal activity of ether is not the underlying mechanism of the inhibition by anesthesia of certain experimental neurotropic virus infections. Indirect inhibition of the virus by the anesthetic through an alteration in the metabolism of either the host cell or the host animal as a whole appears at this point to be a more likely possibility.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (613.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clark P. F., Schindler J., Roberts D. J. SOME PROPERTIES OF POLIOMYELITIS VIRUS. J Bacteriol. 1930 Sep;20(3):213–233. doi: 10.1128/jb.20.3.213-233.1930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kramer S. D., Sobel A. E., Grossman L. H., Hoskwith B. SURVIVAL OF THE VIRUS OF POLIOMYELITIS IN THE ORAL AND NASAL SECRETION OF CONVALESCENTS. J Exp Med. 1936 Jul 31;64(2):173–182. doi: 10.1084/jem.64.2.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Paul J. R., Trask J. D., Gard S. II. POLIOMYELITIC VIRUS IN URBAN SEWAGE. J Exp Med. 1940 May 31;71(6):765–777. doi: 10.1084/jem.71.6.765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sulkin S. E., Zarafonetis C., Goth A. INFLUENCE OF ANESTHESIA ON EXPERIMENTAL NEUROTROPIC VIRUS INFECTIONS : I. IN VIVO STUDIES WITH THE VIRUSES OF WESTERN AND EASTERN EQUINE ENCEPHALOMYELITIS, ST. LOUIS ENCEPHALITIS, POLIOMYELITIS (LANSING), AND RABIES. J Exp Med. 1946 Sep 30;84(4):277–292. doi: 10.1084/jem.84.4.277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Trask J. D., Paul J. R., Vignec A. J. I. POLIOMYELITIC VIRUS IN HUMAN STOOLS. J Exp Med. 1940 May 31;71(6):751–763. doi: 10.1084/jem.71.6.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES